Literature DB >> 33438366

Incremental prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging over the co-morbid burden in acute decompensated heart failure.

Kiyomi Kayama1, Takahisa Yamada1, Shunsuke Tamaki1, Tetsuya Watanabe1, Takashi Morita1, Yoshio Furukawa1, Masato Kawasaki1, Atsushi Kikuchi1, Tsutomu Kawai1, Masahiro Seo1, Jun Nakamura1, Masatsugu Kawahira1, Masatake Fukunami1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Co-morbidities are associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure, while cardiac iodine-123 (I-123) metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging provides prognostic information in such patients. We sought to prospectively investigate the incremental prognostic value of cardiac MIBG imaging over the co-morbid burden, in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 433 consecutive ADHF patients with survival to discharge, we measured the co-morbidity using age-adjusted Charlson co-morbidity index (ACCI), commonly employed to evaluate a weighted and scored co-morbid condition, adding additional points for age. In cardiac MIBG imaging, the cardiac MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio (late HMR) was measured on the delayed image. Over a follow-up period of 2.9 ± 1.5 years, 160 patients had a cardiac event (a composite of cardiac death and unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure). Patients with high ACCI (≥6: median value) had a significantly greater risk of a cardiac event. In multivariate Cox analysis, the ACCI and late HMR were significantly and independently associated with a cardiac event. In both high and low ACCI subgroups (ACCI ≥ 6 and <6, respectively), patients with low late HMR had a significantly greater risk of a cardiac event (high ACCI: 51% vs. 34% P = 0.0026, adjusted HR 1.74 [1.21-2.51]; low ACCI: 34% vs. 17%, P = 0.0228, adjusted HR 2.19 [1.10-4.37]).
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac MIBG imaging could provide additional prognostic information over ACCI, which was also promoted to be a useful risk model, in patients admitted for ADHF.
© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute decompensated heart failure; Age-adjusted co-morbidity index; Cardiac MIBG imaging; Co-morbidity; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33438366      PMCID: PMC8006734          DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ESC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2055-5822


Introduction

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) has increased dramatically over the past decades. One of the main causes is an increase in the number of elderly patients, , , because the general population continues to age rapidly. In addition, although the improved treatment of acute coronary syndrome and valvular diseases is extending life expectancy, earlier diagnosis and better treatment of HF are also leading to progressive aging of the HF population. , The elderly with HF often suffer from multiple co‐existent diseases and/or conditions (co‐morbidities). Co‐morbidities are strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with chronic HF, although most existing reviews or reports focus on individual diseases or syndromes. , , , , Age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index (ACCI), which is a validated instrument to assess co‐morbidity and has been shown to predict prognosis in a variety of cardiovascular patient groups, , , , has recently been used as a robust prognostic model in chronic HF patients. , , , However, the long‐term prognostic significance of ACCI remains to be fully clarified in patients with acute decompensated HF (ADHF). In HF, abnormalities in cardiac autonomic control characterized by sympathetic overactivity are strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Cardiac iodine‐123 (I‐123) metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging is known to estimate cardiac adrenergic nerve activity and provides prognostic information on patients with chronic HF. , , , , , , Moreover, we have recently reported the prognostic value of cardiac MIBG imaging in patients admitted for ADHF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of cardiac MIBG imaging over the co‐morbid burden in case of usefulness of ACCI in patients admitted for ADHF.

Methods

Subjects

We analysed data from Osaka Prefectural Acute Heart Failure Syndrome Registry (UMIN 000015246), which was a single‐centre, observational, prospective cohort study. , We enrolled 492 consecutive patients who were admitted for ADHF with survival to discharge between October 2011 and November 2016. We ascertained the presence of ADHF by clinical signs and symptoms based on the Framingham Heart Failure criteria. Patients were excluded from this study if they had severe valvular disease or coronary artery disease requiring urgent or semi‐urgent operation (n = 13), complicating acute coronary syndrome (n = 3), or severe non‐cardiac complications (n = 3). Patients were also excluded because they withdrew informed consent (n = 2). Patients were judged as inappropriate for the study due to difficulties of the follow‐up by primary care physicians (n = 12) were also excluded. Patients who did not receive cardiac 123I‐MIBG imaging at discharge (n = 10) were also excluded. Patients who were taking serotoninnoradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) (n = 6) and who had Parkinson's disease (n = 10) were also excluded because these factors interfere with cardiac 123I‐MIBG uptake. After excluding these patients, we studied 433 ADHF patients (Figure ). All patients gave written informed consent for the participation in this study, which was approved by the Osaka General Medical Center's Review Committee. The investigation conformed with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Figure 1

Flow of patients through the study in Osaka Prefectural Acute Heart Failure Syndrome Registry (OPAR).

Flow of patients through the study in Osaka Prefectural Acute Heart Failure Syndrome Registry (OPAR).

Data collection

All patients underwent echocardiography and venous blood sampling at discharge. In echocardiography, left ventricular end‐diastolic (LVDd), end‐systolic dimensions (LVDs), and left atrial dimension (LAD) were measured by two‐dimensional echocardiography using the standard technique. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured by the modified Simpson's method. Blood samples for the assessment of complete blood count, haemoglobin, serum sodium, chloride, potassium, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin, uric acid, C‐reactive protein (CRP), and plasma B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level were obtained at discharge.

Evaluation of non‐cardiac co‐morbidity

The co‐morbid conditions of patients at discharge was evaluated using ACCI by a clinician who was blinded to the clinical status of the patient. ACCI contains 19 medical conditions: myocardial infarction, congestive HF, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, connective tissue disease, gastrointestinal ulcer disease, mild or moderate to severe liver disease, diabetes mellitus with or without its complications, moderate or severe renal disease, any tumour, leukaemia, lymphoma, secondary metastasis, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. These medical conditions are weighted and scored, and additional points are assigned per decade of age over 40 years. , ACCI values were derived for each patient based on chart review and assigned according to baseline clinical information.

Cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging

At discharge, all patients underwent myocardial imaging with 123I‐MIBG (MyoMIBG‐I 123 injection; FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) using a conventional rotating gamma camera (BrightView; Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) equipped with a low‐energy type, cardiac high‐resolution collimator. An 111 MBq dose of I‐123 MIBG was injected intravenously at rest after an overnight fast. Initial and delayed image acquisitions were performed in the anterior chest view at 20 and 200 min after isotope injection as previously described. , A clinician who was unaware of the clinical status of the patients assessed the cardiac MIBG uptake. The MIBG heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio (HMR) was determined by dividing the counts/pixel in a visually drawn heart region of interest by the counts/pixel in an upper mediastinum region of interest. Background subtraction was performed with the upper mediastinal region of interest. After considering the radioactive decay of I‐123, the cardiac MIBG washout rate (WR) was calculated from the initial and delayed images.

Clinical outcome

After discharge, all patients were followed up by the HF team at our institution. Survival data were obtained by physicians of the patients making direct contact with them in a hospital outpatient setting, by a telephone interview with the family of the patients, or by a mail by dedicated coordinators and investigators. The primary endpoint of this study was a cardiac event, defined as a composite of cardiac death and unplanned hospitalization for worsening HF.

Statistics

All continuous variables were expressed as mean (±standard deviation, SD) or median (25–75 percentiles) as appropriate, and categorical variables were expressed as percentage. Univariate differences in baseline variables between patients with and without cardiac events were evaluated using a χ 2 test for categorical variables or a two‐sample t‐tests for continuous variables. A Mann–Whitney U‐test was also used to compare differences in data that was not normally distributed. The areas under the curve (AUC) of cardiac MIBG parameters were compared using a receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Event‐free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences in survival rates were compared between groups using the log‐rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify patients at risk of a cardiac event by calculating the multivariate‐adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariate analysis consisted of major confounding variables that were proposed by previous HF reports, namely sex, systolic blood pressure and heart rate at discharge, body mass index (BMI), LVEF, New York Heart association functional classification (NYHA class), history of atrial fibrillation, ischaemic origin, haemoglobin, serum sodium, BUN, albumin, and plasma BNP levels. , , , , Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) attained by the addition of late HMR to ACCI were also calculated. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. MedCalc version 17.11.5‐64 bit (MedCalc software bvba) and EZR version 1.03 (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

Comparison of baseline characteristics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with and without cardiac events

The distribution of ACCI is shown in Figure . During a mean follow‐up period of 2.9 ± 1.5 years, 160 out of 433 ADHF patients (37%) had a cardiac event. Baseline characteristics of ADHF patients with and without cardiac events were shown in Table . When compared with patients without cardiac events, those with cardiac events were significantly older, had a significantly higher NYHA class and BNP level, and had lower BMI and lower haemoglobin, serum albumin, sodium, and chloride levels. Furthermore, patients with cardiac events had a significantly higher ACCI. Representative cardiac MIBG images in patients with and without cardiac events were shown in Figure . The early and late HMRs were significantly lower, and the WR was significantly higher in patients with cardiac events. There was no significant correlation between ACCI and either HMR or WR. When compared with non‐ischaemic HF patients, late HMR were significantly lower in patients with ischaemic HF (late: 1.61 ± 0.26 vs. 1.70 ± 0.30, P = 0.0032).
Figure 2

Histogram of age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index (ACCI).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study patients in ADHF patients with and without cardiac events

Cardiac events P value
With (N = 160)Without (N = 273)
Clinical data
Age (years)77 ± 1172 ± 140.0002
Gender (men, %)57600.5342
Body mass index20.8 ± 3.521.5 ± 4.80.0947
Heart rate (b.p.m.)66 ± 1166 ± 110.9424
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)114 ± 18117 ± 180.0959
NYHA class I/II/III (%)43/38/1930/35/360.0001
Prior HF hospitalization (%)3412<0.0001
Atrial fibrillation (%)50450.4039
Ischaemic origin (%)47310.0006
Hypertension (%)16180.4655
Co‐morbidity burden (%)
Peripheral vascular disease26250.1925
Cerebrovascular disease23260.5752
Dementia870.6626
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease1280.1137
Connective tissue disease540.6403
Peptic ulcer disease360.2542
DM without complications0160.0085
DM with complications4127<0.0001
Moderate to severe CKD11100.756
Mild liver disease120.4772
Moderate to severe liver disease100.1923
Haemiplegia220.6423
Leukaemia00・・・
Malignant lymphoma010.2775
Tumour010.9161
Secondary metastasis100.4431
AIDS00・・・
ACCI (points)6.5 ± 1.65.8 ± 1.7<0.0001
Medication use
ACE inhibitors/ARB (%)58580.7878
MRA (%)34360.3652
Beta‐blockers (%)90890.5751
Loop diuretics (%)82860.2837
Digitalis (%)340.4900
Echocardiography
LVEF (%)46 ± 1546 ± 140.8738
LVDd (mm)54 ± 1053 ± 90.4118
LVDs (mm)41 ± 1240 ± 110.6558
LAD (mm)43 ± 743 ± 70.0887
Laboratory data
Haemoglobin (g/dL)11.1 ± 1.912.2 ± 2.3<0.0001
Albumin (g/dL)3.3 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.50.0027
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.4 (1.2, 1.5)1.1 (1.0, 1.1)<0.0001
BUN (mg/dL)30 (27, 33)23 (22, 25)<0.0001
Uric acid (mg/dL)7.3 ± 2.37.0 ± 1.90.1246
Serum sodium (mEq/L)138 ± 4138 ± 30.0086
Serum potassium (mEq/L)4.2 ± 0.54.2 ± 0.50.2563
Serum chloride (mEq/L)101 ± 6102 ± 40.0448
BNP (pg/mL)260 (219, 350)192 (164, 222)0.0022
MIBG data
Early HMR1.82 ± 0.311.93 ± 0.300.0004
Late HMR1.61 ± 0.301.73 ± 0.28<0.0001
WR (%)38.5 ± 16.534.2 ± 13.80.0034

ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HF, heart failure; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake ratio; LAD, left atrial diameter; LVDd, left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVDs, left ventricular systolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRAs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; NYHA, New York Heart Association; WR, washout rate.

Values are mean ± SD or %.

Figure 3

Representative cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine images in patients with and without cardiac event. HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio.

Histogram of age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index (ACCI). Baseline characteristics of the study patients in ADHF patients with and without cardiac events ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HF, heart failure; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake ratio; LAD, left atrial diameter; LVDd, left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVDs, left ventricular systolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRAs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; NYHA, New York Heart Association; WR, washout rate. Values are mean ± SD or %. Representative cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine images in patients with and without cardiac event. HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio.

Prognostic analysis by age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index and cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging

Patients with a higher ACCI (≥6: median value) had a significantly greater risk of cardiac events than those with a lower ACCI (<6) (43% vs. 26%, P = 0.0001; Figure ). Patients with a lower early and late HMR had a significantly greater risk of cardiac events (early HMR < 1.78 determined by ROC analysis; 49% vs. 31%, P = 0.0087, late HMR < 1.56 determined by ROC analysis; 54% vs. 24%, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, a higher WR also had a significantly greater risk of cardiac events (WR > 38.4% determined by ROC analysis; 47% vs. 32%, P < 0.0001). ROC curve analysis showed that AUC of early HMR, late HMR, and WR were 0.597 (95% CI: 0.549–0.644), 0.625 (95% CI: 0.577–0.670), and 0.575 (95% CI: 0.527–0.622) respectively, and the predictive power of late HMR was superior to that of the other parameters (Figure ).
Figure 4

Cardiac event‐free rates in ADHF patients with high and low ACCI. ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; ADHF, acute decompensated heart failure.

Figure 5

Receiver‐operating characteristic curve analysis of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine parameters for the prediction of the cardiac events. AUC, areas under the curve; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio; WR, washout rate.

Cardiac event‐free rates in ADHF patients with high and low ACCI. ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; ADHF, acute decompensated heart failure. Receiver‐operating characteristic curve analysis of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine parameters for the prediction of the cardiac events. AUC, areas under the curve; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio; WR, washout rate.

Incremental prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging over age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index

In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, both ACCI (P = 0.0015) and late HMR (P = 0.0069) were significantly and independently associated with cardiac events after adjustment for major HF confounders (Table ). In the ACCI ≥ 6 subgroup, patients with a lower late HMR (<1.65: median value) had a significantly greater risk of a cardiac event (51% vs. 34%, P = 0.0026, HR 1.74 [1.21–2.51]). Furthermore, in the ACCI < 6 subgroup, patients with a lower late HMR (<1.71: median value) also had a significantly greater risk of a cardiac event (34% vs. 17%, P = 0.0228, adjusted HR 2.19 [1.10–4.37]; Figure ). Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) attained by the addition of late HMR to ACCI were also statistically significant for the prediction of the cardiac events (NRI: 0.3491 [95% CI: 0.1654–0.5329], P = 0.0002; IDI: 0.0214 [0.0079–0.0348], P = 0.00185).
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify patients with ADHF at risk of cardiac event

VariablesUnivariateMultivariate
P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI)
ACCI<0.00011.3487 (1.2147–1.4974)0.00151.2269 (1.0817–1.3912)
Late HMR<0.00010.2557 (0.1426–0.4585)0.00690.4244 (0.2278–0.7907)
BUN<0.00011.0260 (1.0172–1.0349)0.00211.0169 (1.0061–1.0279)
Haemoglobin<0.00010.7938 (0.7333–0.8594)0.00190.8349 (0.7452–0.9353)
NYHA class III<0.00012.0743 (1.4983–2.8718)0.03961.5086 (1.0568–2.1536)
SBP0.00760.9880 (0.9792–0.9968)0.00110.9839 (0.9744–0.9935)
Log BNP<0.00011.4633 (1.2458–1.7188)
Sex0.62221.0826 (0.7895–1.4846)
Body mass index0.01050.9485 (0.9109–0.9877)
Heart rate0.80201.0018 (0.9875–1.0164)
Albumin0.00050.5511 (0.3943–0.7702)
Sodium0.00020.9184 (0.8782–0.9605)
LVEF0.47660.9962 (0.9857–1.0068)
Ischaemic origin0.00031.7901 (1.3090–2.4480)
AF history0.21601.2170 (0.8916–1.6613)

ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; AF, atrial fibrillation; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CI, confidence interval; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake ratio; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Figure 6

Cardiac event‐free rates in ADHF patients with high and low late HMR in the subgroups with high and low ACCI. ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify patients with ADHF at risk of cardiac event ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; AF, atrial fibrillation; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CI, confidence interval; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake ratio; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SBP, systolic blood pressure. Cardiac event‐free rates in ADHF patients with high and low late HMR in the subgroups with high and low ACCI. ACCI, age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index; HMR, heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio.

Discussion

In the present study, we show the prognostic significance of co‐morbidities in patients with ADHF. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to show the incremental prognostic value of cardiac MIBG imaging over the co‐morbid conditions evaluated by ACCI in ADHF patients.

Co‐morbid burden of patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure

The increased population of elderly patients with HF, their higher risk mortality, and repetitive hospitalization imposes a heavy social and economic burden. Therefore, the management of older HF patients with complex co‐morbidities is becoming an important topic, and prognosis prediction for such patients is an urgent issue for society. Although holistically recognizing multiple co‐morbidities is necessary for the comprehensive understanding of the clinical condition of elderly HF patients, most previous studies have focused on individual diseases or syndromes. , , One reason for this was the presumed difficulty in evaluating the burden of co‐morbidity quantitatively, and that there were few established risk models to score it. Charlson co‐morbidity index (CCI) is derived from a cohort of 604 oncology patients in a single US hospital for whom the 1 year mortality was predicted in 1987, and because age is undoubtedly an important predictor of mortality, it has been revised such that for each decade over the age of 40 years, 1 point is added to the overall score of a patient. , ACCI became widely known and recently has been used as a robust prognostic model to evaluate multiple co‐morbid conditions in patients with various diseases, including HF. , , , , , , Previous studies has showed that a non‐cardiac co‐morbidity burden is strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes in chronic HF. , Regarding patients with ADHF, a few studies , have shown the prognostic significance of non‐cardiac co‐morbidity burden. In these studies, the follow‐up period was relatively short (12 months), and there was consequently no information available on the long‐term prognostic significance of co‐morbidity burden in ADHF patients. In our study, we demonstrate that ADHF patients with multiple co‐morbidities evaluated by ACCI had a greater risk of cardiac events over a 5 year period, suggesting that ACCI is a useful long‐term prognostic marker not only in chronic HF patients but also in ADHF patients.

Incremental prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging over age‐adjusted Charlson co‐morbidity index and future perspective

Cardiac MIBG imaging is a useful tool for examining the increase in sympathetic nerve activity, which is strongly associated with a poor prognosis in HF patients. Because the first report by Merlet et al., which demonstrated the prognostic value of cardiac MIBG imaging in patients with chronic HF, the predictive value of MIBG imaging has been confirmed in several studies, including our own previous work. , , , , In the present study, there was no significant correlation between the ACCI and cardiac MIBG parameters, although these variables were independently associated with poor outcomes. A previous report suggested that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with sympathetic nerve system dysfunction. However, there are no reports that describe the prognostic value of the co‐morbid burden as a whole and sympathetic nerve system. ACCI includes multiple co‐morbid conditions, while there is a paucity of information on the sympathetic nerve activity that is an essential factor when considering the conditions of HF patients. In the previous reports which mainly included chronic HF patients with reduced LVEF, late HMR was significantly associated with the poor outcome independently of plasma BNP level and LVEF. , In the present study, we enrolled ADHF patients irrespectively of reduced or preserved LVEF, which resulted in that late HMR was more predictive and LVEF was not predictive. The discrepancy between the present study and previous reports might be due to the patient's characteristics (chronic HF vs. acute HF, reduced LVEF vs. non‐reduced LVEF).

Limitations

There are several limitations in this study. First, because this is a single‐centre study, the small and empirically selected population sample size was a major limitation. Second, the medications used during the follow‐up might have affected MIBG uptake and the clinical outcome. A study with serial evaluation of cardiac MIBG might therefore be necessary. Third, we need to consider the specificity of our study patients when we generalize our results. There were few patients with tumours, secondary metastases, moderate to severe liver disease, or malignant lymphoma. Additionally, there were no patients with leukaemia or acquired immune deficiency syndrome, which score 2 and 6 points, respectively, and as such, the ACCI score may be lower than at other institutions in Japan or in non‐Japanese populations. Thus, external validation would be needed to verify our results.

Conclusions

Cardiac MIBG imaging could provide additional prognostic information over the co‐morbid conditions evaluated by the ACCI.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author contributions

Takahisa Yamada designed this study. Takahisa Yamada, Shunsuke Tamaki, and Masatake Fukunami contributed to the analysis and assisted in writing the manuscript. All remaining authors have contributed to the data collection, interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript.
  41 in total

1.  Impact of noncardiac comorbidities on morbidity and mortality in a predominantly male population with heart failure and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Sameer Ather; Wenyaw Chan; Biykem Bozkurt; David Aguilar; Kumudha Ramasubbu; Amit A Zachariah; Xander H T Wehrens; Anita Deswal
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Reframing the association and significance of co-morbidities in heart failure.

Authors:  Filippos Triposkiadis; Gregory Giamouzis; John Parissis; Randall C Starling; Harisios Boudoulas; John Skoularigis; Javed Butler; Gerasimos Filippatos
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 15.534

3.  Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation.

Authors:  K D Aaronson; J S Schwartz; T M Chen; K L Wong; J E Goin; D M Mancini
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  High comorbidity, measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index, associates with higher 1-year mortality risks in elderly patients experiencing a first acute heart failure hospitalization.

Authors:  Francesc Formiga; Rafael Moreno-Gonzalez; David Chivite; Jonathan Franco; Abelardo Montero; Xavier Corbella
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Serial Change in Serum Chloride During Hospitalization Could Predict Heart Failure Death in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Takumi Kondo; Takahisa Yamada; Shunsuke Tamaki; Takashi Morita; Yoshio Furukawa; Yusuke Iwasaki; Masato Kawasaki; Atsushi Kikuchi; Tatsuhisa Ozaki; Yoshihiro Sato; Masahiro Seo; Iyo Ikeda; Eiji Fukuhara; Makoto Abe; Jun Nakamura; Yasushi Sakata; Masatake Fukunami
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.993

6.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Comorbidity in heart failure. Results of the Spanish RICA Registry.

Authors:  F-J Ruiz-Laiglesia; M Sánchez-Marteles; J-I Pérez-Calvo; F Formiga; J A Bartolomé-Satué; A Armengou-Arxé; R López-Quirós; J Pérez-Silvestre; A Serrado-Iglesias; M Montero-Pérez-Barquero
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2014-06-16

8.  The prognosis of implantable defibrillator patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: comorbidity burden as predictor of mortality.

Authors:  Dominic A M J Theuns; Beat A Schaer; Osama I I Soliman; David Altmann; Christian Sticherling; Marcel L Geleijnse; Stefan Osswald; Luc Jordaens
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Incremental prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging over the co-morbid burden in acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Kiyomi Kayama; Takahisa Yamada; Shunsuke Tamaki; Tetsuya Watanabe; Takashi Morita; Yoshio Furukawa; Masato Kawasaki; Atsushi Kikuchi; Tsutomu Kawai; Masahiro Seo; Jun Nakamura; Masatsugu Kawahira; Masatake Fukunami
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-01-12

10.  Comorbidity profiles and inpatient outcomes during hospitalization for heart failure: an analysis of the U.S. Nationwide inpatient sample.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Christopher V Chien; Julie T Bidwell; Jill M Gelow; Quin E Denfeld; Ruth Masterson Creber; Harleah G Buck; James O Mudd
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.298

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  123I-MIBG imaging in heart failure: impact of comorbidities on cardiac sympathetic innervation.

Authors:  Paola Gargiulo; Wanda Acampa; Gaetano Asile; Vincenza Abbate; Ermanno Nardi; Federica Marzano; Roberta Assante; Carmela Nappi; Antonio Luca Maria Parlati; Christian Basile; Santo Dellegrottaglie; Stefania Paolillo; Alberto Cuocolo; Pasquale Perrone-Filardi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Incremental prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging over the co-morbid burden in acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Kiyomi Kayama; Takahisa Yamada; Shunsuke Tamaki; Tetsuya Watanabe; Takashi Morita; Yoshio Furukawa; Masato Kawasaki; Atsushi Kikuchi; Tsutomu Kawai; Masahiro Seo; Jun Nakamura; Masatsugu Kawahira; Masatake Fukunami
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-01-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.