Literature DB >> 33437542

Efficacy of Tacrolimus Versus Clobetasol in the Treatment of Vitiligo.

Hassan Mumtaz1,2,3, Salwa Anis4, Ambreen Akhtar5, Masooma Rubab6, Ayesha Zafar7, Nayab Niazi8, Hina Bahadur9, Abdul Subhan Talpur10, Muhammad A Shafiq11,12, Tehreem Fatima11.   

Abstract

Introduction Vitiligo is an acquired pigmentary disorder of the skin and mucous membranes which is characterized by circumscribed depigmented macules and patches. Vitiligo is a progressive disorder in which some or all of the melanocytes in the affected skin are selectively destroyed. Around 0.5-2% of the world population is affected by vitiligo and the average age of onset is 20 years. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus versus clobetasol in the treatment of vitiligo. It is an open randomized control trial conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Nishtar Hospital, Multan for six months.  Methods One hundred sixty-two patients of vitiligo were included in the study. The disease was diagnosed on basis of clinical features and the Standard Assessment scale proposed by Hossain which was used to monitor and grade the response. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups by lottery method having 81 patients in each group. Group A was given tacrolimus whereas Group B was given clobetasol. Patients were followed up every four weeks. On the 12th week of treatment, effectiveness was assessed by measuring the Assessment scale proposed by Hossain. The results of the two groups were then compared. Results Sixty-three patients (38.9%) were males whereas 99 patients (61.1%) were females. The mean age of the patients included in the study was 29.68 + 8.162 years. The mean weight of the patients was 62.25 + 9.529 Kg. Out of 162, treatment was effective in 89 patients (54.9%) whereas in 73 patients (45.1%) the treatment was ineffective. In Group A (tacrolimus), 42 patients (51.9%) had effective treatment (on the complete resolution of symptoms) whereas 39 patients (48.1 %) had ineffective treatment. In Group B (clobetasol), 47 patients (58%) had effective treatment, and the rest (34, 42%) had ineffective treatment. A Chi-Square test was applied to compare the efficacy of the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in both the groups in terms of efficacy. Group B was numerically superior in terms of effective treatment (47 versus 42) but not superior statistically. Conclusion Comparison of tacrolimus and clobetasol in patients of vitiligo showed no significant difference in the efficacy of the two groups. It can be concluded that tacrolimus may be considered superior to corticosteroids as its local and systemic adverse effects are less.
Copyright © 2020, Mumtaz et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clobetasol propionate; tacrolimus; topical immunomodulators; topical steroids; vitiligo

Year:  2020        PMID: 33437542      PMCID: PMC7793363          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  10 in total

Review 1.  Shared genetic relationships underlying generalized vitiligo and autoimmune thyroid disease.

Authors:  Richard A Spritz
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  High-potency steroid use in children with vitiligo: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jennifer Kwinter; Janice Pelletier; Amina Khambalia; Elena Pope
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 3.  Current remedies for vitiligo.

Authors:  M Abu Tahir; K Pramod; S H Ansari; Javed Ali
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 9.754

4.  Vitiligo treated with topical clobetasol propionate.

Authors:  J Kumari
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1984-05

5.  Topical 0.05% clobetasol propionate versus 1% pimecrolimus ointment in vitiligo.

Authors:  Basak Coskun; Yunus Saral; Dilara Turgut
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.328

6.  Topical immunomodulators are effective for treatment of vitiligo.

Authors:  Chong Won Choi; Sung Eun Chang; Hana Bak; Jee Ho Choi; Hyun Sun Park; Chang Hun Huh; Chan Woong Kim; Sung Eun Kim; Seog Kyun Mun; Beom Joon Kim; Myeung Nam Kim
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.005

7.  A double-blind randomized trial of 0.1% tacrolimus vs 0.05% clobetasol for the treatment of childhood vitiligo.

Authors:  Veronica Lepe; Benjamin Moncada; Juan Pablo Castanedo-Cazares; Maria Bertha Torres-Alvarez; Carlos A Ortiz; Antonio B Torres-Rubalcava
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2003-05

8.  Efficacy and safety of tarcrolimus cream 0.1% in the treatment of vitiligo.

Authors:  Ai-E Xu; Di-Min Zhang; Xiao-Dong Wei; Bo Huang; Liang-Jun Lu
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.736

9.  Future research into the treatment of vitiligo: where should our priorities lie? Results of the vitiligo priority setting partnership.

Authors:  V Eleftheriadou; M E Whitton; D J Gawkrodger; J Batchelor; J Corne; B Lamb; S Ersser; J Ravenscroft; K S Thomas
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Segmental vitiligo after infliximab use for rheumatoid arthritis--a case report.

Authors:  Clarissa Luiza Dalla Bernardina Carvalho; Luciena Cegatto Martins Ortigosa
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Post-Traumatic Stress in Vitiligo Patients: A Neglected but Real-Existing Psychological Impairment.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Liu; Yan Tan; Tian Chen; Wei Liu; Yue-Tong Qian; Dong-Lai Ma
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2022-03-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.