Literature DB >> 33436938

Attentional focus modulates automatic finger-tapping movements.

Xilei Zhang1,2,3, Xingxun Jiang4,5, Xiangyong Yuan6, Wenming Zheng7,8.   

Abstract

The majority of human behaviors are composed of automatic movements (e.g., walking or finger-tapping) which are learned during nurturing and can be performed simultaneously without interfering with other tasks. One critical and yet to be examined assumption is that the attention system has the innate capacity to modulate automatic movements. The present study tests this assumption. Setting no deliberate goals for movement, we required sixteen participants to perform personalized and well-practiced finger-tapping movements in three experiments while focusing their attention on either different component fingers or away from movements. Using cutting-edge pose estimation techniques to quantify tapping trajectory, we showed that attention to movement can disrupt movement automaticity, as indicated by decreased inter-finger and inter-trial temporal coherence; facilitate the attended and inhibit the unattended movements in terms of tapping amplitude; and re-organize the action sequence into distinctive patterns according to the focus of attention. These findings demonstrate compelling evidence that attention can modulate automatic movements and provide an empirical foundation for theories based on such modulation in controlling human behavior.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436938      PMCID: PMC7804157          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80296-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  42 in total

Review 1.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; K Dunbar; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Increased jump height and reduced EMG activity with an external focus.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Janet S Dufek; Leonardo Lozano; Christina Pettigrew
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing.

Authors:  Keith R Lohse; David E Sherwood; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 4.  A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning.

Authors:  D B Willingham
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 6.  Attention to action.

Authors:  R E Passingham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action.

Authors:  M Jueptner; K M Stephan; C D Frith; D J Brooks; R S Frackowiak; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: the role of working memory in complex, organized behavior.

Authors:  D Y Kimberg; M J Farah
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1993-12

9.  Memory for Repeated Images in Rapid-Serial-Visual-Presentation Streams of Thousands of Images.

Authors:  Evelina Thunell; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24

10.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain.

Authors:  Katrin Herrmann; Leila Montaser-Kouhsari; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.