Literature DB >> 33436929

Evaluation of a multiparametric MRI radiomic-based approach for stratification of equivocal PI-RADS 3 and upgraded PI-RADS 4 prostatic lesions.

Valentina Brancato1, Marco Aiello2, Luca Basso2, Serena Monti3, Luigi Palumbo4, Giuseppe Di Costanzo4, Marco Salvatore2, Alfonso Ragozzino4, Carlo Cavaliere2.   

Abstract

Despite the key-role of the Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in the diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer (PCa), this system remains to be affected by several limitations, primarily associated with the interpretation of equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions and with the debated role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI), which is only used to upgrade peripheral PI-RADS category 3 lesions to PI-RADS category 4 if enhancement is focal. We aimed at investigating the usefulness of radiomics for detection of PCa lesions (Gleason Score ≥ 6) in PI-RADS 3 lesions and in peripheral PI-RADS 3 upgraded to PI-RADS 4 lesions (upPI-RADS 4). Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) data of patients who underwent prostatic mpMRI between April 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Biopsy results were used as gold standard. PI-RADS 3 and PI-RADS 4 lesions were re-scored according to the PI-RADS v2.1 before and after DCE-MRI evaluation. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted MRI (T2), Apparent diffusion Coefficient (ADC) map and DCE-MRI subtracted images using PyRadiomics. Feature selection was performed using Wilcoxon-ranksum test and Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR). Predictive models were constructed for PCa detection in PI-RADS 3 and upPI-RADS 4 lesions using at each step an imbalance-adjusted bootstrap resampling (IABR) on 1000 samples. 41 PI-RADS 3 and 32 upPI-RADS 4 lesions were analyzed. Among 293 radiomic features, the top selected features derived from T2 and ADC. For PI-RADS 3 stratification, second order model showed higher performances (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve-AUC- = 80%), while for upPI-RADS 4 stratification, first order model showed higher performances respect to superior order models (AUC = 89%). Our results support the significant role of T2 and ADC radiomic features for PCa detection in lesions scored as PI-RADS 3 and upPI-RADS 4. Radiomics models showed high diagnostic efficacy in classify PI-RADS 3 and upPI-RADS 4 lesions, outperforming PI-RADS v2.1 performance.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436929      PMCID: PMC7804929          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80749-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  56 in total

Review 1.  Multiparametric MRI and radiomics in prostate cancer: a review.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Hayley M Reynolds; Bimal Parameswaran; Darren Wraith; Mary E Finnegan; Scott Williams; Annette Haworth
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.430

2.  Influence of inter-observer delineation variability on radiomics stability in different tumor sites.

Authors:  Matea Pavic; Marta Bogowicz; Xaver Würms; Stefan Glatz; Tobias Finazzi; Oliver Riesterer; Johannes Roesch; Leonie Rudofsky; Martina Friess; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Martin Huellner; Isabelle Opitz; Walter Weder; Thomas Frauenfelder; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  T2w-MRI signal normalization affects radiomics features reproducibility.

Authors:  Elisa Scalco; Antonella Belfatto; Alfonso Mastropietro; Tiziana Rancati; Barbara Avuzzi; Antonella Messina; Riccardo Valdagni; Giovanna Rizzo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Shoshana B Ginsburg; Ahmad Algohary; Shivani Pahwa; Vikas Gulani; Lee Ponsky; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Pekka Taimen; Robert Villani; Phillip Stricker; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Moritz Kasel-Seibert; Thomas Lehmann; René Aschenbach; Felix V Guettler; Mohamed Abubrig; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Ulf Teichgraeber; Tobias Franiel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Robert V Mulkern; Lawrence P Panych; Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  PI-RADS 3 Lesions: Role of Prostate MRI Texture Analysis in the Identification of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Dario Giambelluca; Roberto Cannella; Federica Vernuccio; Albert Comelli; Alice Pavone; Leonardo Salvaggio; Massimo Galia; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla; Giuseppe Salvaggio
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2019-10-31

8.  Robust Radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation.

Authors:  Chintan Parmar; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Mohammed Jermoumi; Sara Carvalho; Raymond H Mak; Sushmita Mitra; B Uma Shankar; Ron Kikinis; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Philippe Lambin; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Repeatability of Multiparametric Prostate MRI Radiomics Features.

Authors:  Michael Schwier; Joost van Griethuysen; Mark G Vangel; Steve Pieper; Sharon Peled; Clare Tempany; Hugo J W L Aerts; Ron Kikinis; Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Gray-level discretization impacts reproducible MRI radiomics texture features.

Authors:  Loïc Duron; Daniel Balvay; Saskia Vande Perre; Afef Bouchouicha; Julien Savatovsky; Jean-Claude Sadik; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Laure Fournier; Augustin Lecler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  MRI-Based Radiomic Features Help Identify Lesions and Predict Histopathological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Valentina Brancato; Nunzia Garbino; Marco Salvatore; Carlo Cavaliere
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 2.  Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi; Francesco Del Giudice; Giuseppe Carrieri; Gian Maria Busetto; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Alessandro Sciarra; Martina Maggi; Felice Crocetto; Biagio Barone; Vincenzo Francesco Caputo; Michele Marchioni; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Ciro Imbimbo; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Stefano Luzzago; Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Luigi Cormio; Riccardo Autorino; Octavian Sabin Tătaru
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Predictive Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marina Triquell; Miriam Campistol; Ana Celma; Lucas Regis; Mercè Cuadras; Jacques Planas; Enrique Trilla; Juan Morote
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jasper J Twilt; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Henkjan J Huisman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maarten de Rooij
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.