Literature DB >> 33436663

Environmental convergence in facial preferences: a cross-group comparison of Asian Vietnamese, Czech Vietnamese, and Czechs.

Ondřej Pavlovič1, Vojtěch Fiala1, Karel Kleisner2.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that sociocultural environment has a significant impact on human behavior. This contribution focuses on differences in the perception of attractiveness of European (Czech) faces as rated by Czechs of European origin, Vietnamese persons living in the Czech Republic and Vietnamese who permanently reside in Vietnam. We investigated whether attractiveness judgments and preferences for facial sex-typicality and averageness in Vietnamese who grew up and live in the Czech Republic are closer to the judgements and preferences of Czech Europeans or to those of Vietnamese born and residing in Vietnam. We examined the relative contribution of sexual shape dimorphism and averageness to the perception of facial attractiveness across all three groups of raters. Czech Europeans, Czech Vietnamese, and Asian Vietnamese raters of both sexes rated facial portraits of 100 Czech European participants (50 women and 50 men, standardized, non-manipulated) for attractiveness. Taking Czech European ratings as a standard for Czech facial attractiveness, we showed that Czech Vietnamese assessments of attractiveness were closer to this standard than assessments by the Asian Vietnamese. Among all groups of raters, facial averageness positively correlated with perceived attractiveness, which is consistent with the "average is attractive" hypothesis. A marginal impact of sexual shape dimorphism on attractiveness rating was found only in Czech European male raters: neither Czech Vietnamese nor Asian Vietnamese raters of either sex utilized traits associated with sexual shape dimorphism as a cue of attractiveness. We thus conclude that Vietnamese people permanently living in the Czech Republic converge with Czechs of Czech origin in perceptions of facial attractiveness and that this population adopted some but not all Czech standards of beauty.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436663      PMCID: PMC7804147          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79623-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  58 in total

1.  Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Masashi Komori; Satoru Kawamura; Shigekazu Ishihara
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: a behavioral and neurophysiological study.

Authors:  Lisa S Scott; James W Tanaka; David L Sheinberg; Tim Curran
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance.

Authors:  Alexander Todorov; Christopher Y Olivola; Ron Dotsch; Peter Mende-Siedlecki
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes.

Authors:  J E Scheib; S W Gangestad; R Thornhill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  CHILDREN'S AND ADULTS' JUDGMENTS OF FACIAL TRUSTWORTHINESS: THE RELATIONSHIP TO FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS.

Authors:  Fengling Ma; Fen Xu; Xianming Luo
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2015-06-24

6.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Markus Kiefer; Cindy M Bukach
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-08

7.  The other-race effect in 3-year-old German and Cameroonian children.

Authors:  Janina Suhrke; Claudia Freitag; Bettina Lamm; Johanna Teiser; Ina Fassbender; Sonja Poloczek; Manuel Teubert; Isabel A Vöhringer; Heidi Keller; Monika Knopf; Arnold Lohaus; Gudrun Schwarzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-18

8.  Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: the role of ethnicity and gender.

Authors:  Vinet Coetzee; Jaco M Greeff; Ian D Stephen; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Focal Length Affects Depicted Shape and Perception of Facial Images.

Authors:  Vít Třebický; Jitka Fialová; Karel Kleisner; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perceptual Narrowing in Speech and Face Recognition: Evidence for Intra-individual Cross-Domain Relations.

Authors:  Anna Krasotkina; Antonia Götz; Barbara Höhle; Gudrun Schwarzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cross-cultural perception of female facial appearance: A multi-ethnic and multi-centre study.

Authors:  Rainer Voegeli; Rotraut Schoop; Elodie Prestat-Marquis; Anthony V Rawlings; Todd K Shackelford; Bernhard Fink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Facial and body sexual dimorphism are not interconnected in the Maasai.

Authors:  Marina L Butovskaya; Victoria V Rostovtseva; Anna A Mezentseva
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Africans and Europeans differ in their facial perception of dominance and sex-typicality: a multidimensional Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Vojtěch Fiala; Petr Tureček; Robert Mbe Akoko; Šimon Pokorný; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.