Karol Postawa1, Jerzy Szczygieł2, Marek Kułażyński2. 1. Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeż Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370, Wrocław, Poland. karol.postawa@pwr.edu.pl. 2. Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeż Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370, Wrocław, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing the efficiency of the biogas production process is possible by modifying the technological installations of the biogas plant. In this study, specific solutions based on a mathematical model that lead to favorable results were proposed. Three configurations were considered: classical anaerobic digestion (AD) and its two modifications, two-phase AD (TPAD) and autogenerative high-pressure digestion (AHPD). The model has been validated based on measurements from a biogas plant located in Poland. Afterward, the TPAD and AHPD concepts were numerically tested for the same volume and feeding conditions. RESULTS: The TPAD system increased the overall biogas production from 9.06 to 9.59%, depending on the feedstock composition, while the content of methane was slightly lower in the whole production chain. On the other hand, the AHPD provided the best purity of the produced fuel, in which a methane content value of 82.13% was reached. At the same time, the overpressure leads to a decrease of around 7.5% in the volumetric production efficiency. The study indicated that the dilution of maize silage with pig manure, instead of water, can have significant benefits in the selected configurations. The content of pig slurry strengthens the impact of the selected process modifications-in the first case, by increasing the production efficiency, and in the second, by improving the methane content in the biogas. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed mathematical model of the AD process proved to be a valuable tool for the description and design of biogas plant. The analysis shows that the overall impact of the presented process modifications is mutually opposite. The feedstock composition has a moderate and unsteady impact on the production profile, in the tested modifications. The dilution with pig manure, instead of water, leads to a slightly better efficiency in the classical configuration. For the TPAD process, the trend is very similar, but the AHPD biogas plant indicates a reverse tendency. Overall, the recommendation from this article is to use the AHPD concept if the composition of the biogas is the most important. In the case in which the performance is the most important factor, it is favorable to use the TPAD configuration.
BACKGROUND: Increasing the efficiency of the biogas production process is possible by modifying the technological installations of the biogas plant. In this study, specific solutions based on a mathematical model that lead to favorable results were proposed. Three configurations were considered: classical anaerobic digestion (AD) and its two modifications, two-phase AD (TPAD) and autogenerative high-pressure digestion (AHPD). The model has been validated based on measurements from a biogas plant located in Poland. Afterward, the TPAD and AHPD concepts were numerically tested for the same volume and feeding conditions. RESULTS: The TPAD system increased the overall biogas production from 9.06 to 9.59%, depending on the feedstock composition, while the content of methane was slightly lower in the whole production chain. On the other hand, the AHPD provided the best purity of the produced fuel, in which a methane content value of 82.13% was reached. At the same time, the overpressure leads to a decrease of around 7.5% in the volumetric production efficiency. The study indicated that the dilution of maize silage with pig manure, instead of water, can have significant benefits in the selected configurations. The content of pig slurry strengthens the impact of the selected process modifications-in the first case, by increasing the production efficiency, and in the second, by improving the methane content in the biogas. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed mathematical model of the AD process proved to be a valuable tool for the description and design of biogas plant. The analysis shows that the overall impact of the presented process modifications is mutually opposite. The feedstock composition has a moderate and unsteady impact on the production profile, in the tested modifications. The dilution with pig manure, instead of water, leads to a slightly better efficiency in the classical configuration. For the TPAD process, the trend is very similar, but the AHPD biogas plant indicates a reverse tendency. Overall, the recommendation from this article is to use the AHPD concept if the composition of the biogas is the most important. In the case in which the performance is the most important factor, it is favorable to use the TPAD configuration.
Authors: Hasina M Pervin; Paul G Dennis; Hui J Lim; Gene W Tyson; Damien J Batstone; Philip L Bond Journal: Water Res Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: Michał Gaworski; Sławomir Jabłoński; Izabela Pawlaczyk-Graja; Rafał Ziewiecki; Piotr Rutkowski; Anna Wieczyńska; Roman Gancarz; Marcin Łukaszewicz Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 6.040
Authors: Carmen De Crescenzo; Antonia Marzocchella; Despina Karatza; Antonio Molino; Pamela Ceron-Chafla; Ralph E F Lindeboom; Jules B van Lier; Simeone Chianese; Dino Musmarra Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod Date: 2022-02-18