Literature DB >> 33435972

An intervention to decrease burnout and increase retention of early career nurses: a mixed methods study of acceptability and feasibility.

Judy Brook1, Leanne M Aitken2, Julie-Ann MacLaren2, Debra Salmon2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To understand the experiences of nursing students and academic staff of an intervention to decrease burnout and increase retention of early career nurses, in order to identify acceptability and feasibility in a single centre.
BACKGROUND: Internationally, retention of nurses is a persistent challenge but there is a dearth of knowledge about the perspectives of stakeholders regarding the acceptability and feasibility of interventions to resolve the issue. This study reports an intervention comprising of mindfulness, psychological skills training and cognitive realignment to prepare participants for early careers as nurses.
METHODS: This is an explanatory sequential mixed methods study, conducted by a UK university and healthcare organisation. Participants were final year pre-registration nursing students (n = 74) and academics (n = 7) involved in the implementation of the intervention. Pre and post measures of acceptability were taken using a questionnaire adapted from the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was used to assess change in acceptability over time. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews, focus groups and field notes were thematically analysed, adhering to COREQ guidelines. Data were collected February to December 2019.
RESULTS: One hundred and five questionnaires, 12 interviews with students and 2 focus groups engaging 7 academic staff were completed. The intervention was perceived as generally acceptable with significant positive increases in acceptability scores over time. Student nurses perceived the intervention equipped them with skills and experience that offered enduring personal benefit. Challenges related to the practice environment and academic assessment pressures. Reported benefits align with known protective factors against burnout and leaving the profession.
CONCLUSION: Planning is needed to embed the intervention into curricula and maximise relationships with placement partners. Evaluating acceptability and feasibility offers new knowledge about the value of the intervention for increasing retention and decreasing burnout for early career nurses. Wider implementation is both feasible and recommended by participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability; Burnout; Early career nurse; Feasibility; Intervention; Mixed methods; Nurse retention; Nurse workforce

Year:  2021        PMID: 33435972      PMCID: PMC7805097          DOI: 10.1186/s12912-020-00524-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Nurs        ISSN: 1472-6955


  6 in total

1.  Empowerment of nursing students in clinical practice: spheres of influence.

Authors:  Caroline Bradbury-Jones; Fiona Irvine; Sally Sambrook
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  Assessing intervention effectiveness for reducing stress in student nurses: quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  Niall D Galbraith; Katherine E Brown
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: a systematic review of 25 years of research.

Authors:  Jef Adriaenssens; Véronique De Gucht; Stan Maes
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 4.  The Effectiveness of Nurse Residency Programs on Retention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jennifer Van Camp; Sharon Chappy
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 5.  Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Levels of Burnout Among Oncology Nurses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  José L Gómez-Urquiza; Ana B Aneas-López; Emilia I Fuente-Solana; Luis Albendín-García; Lourdes Díaz-Rodríguez; Guillermo A Fuente
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  "Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires - a bane or a bonus to research?

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Kate J Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Determinants of the risk of burnout among nurses during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yasmine Khan; Arnaud Bruyneel; Pierre Smith
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.680

2.  The legacy of COVID-19 for radiography practice, education, and research: How to use lessons learned to navigate the "new normal"?

Authors:  C Malamateniou
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2022-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.