Niall D Galbraith1, Katherine E Brown. 1. Department of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, UK. n.galbraith@wlv.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: To identify the types of interventions that are effective in reducing stress in student nurses, and to make recommendations for future research. BACKGROUND: Student nurses experience significant stress during their training and this may contribute to sickness, absence and attrition. Given the global shortage of nurses and high dropout rates amongst trainees, the importance for developing stress management programmes for student nurses is becoming more evident. To date, only one review has examined the effectiveness of stress interventions for student nurses, but the emergence of recent literature warrants a new review. DATA SOURCES: Research papers published between April 1981 and April 2008 were identified from the following databases: Medline, CINAHL, Behavioral Sciences Collection, IBSS and Psychinfo. REVIEW METHODS: A quantitative systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted. Key terms included 'nurses OR nursing OR nurse', 'student OR students', 'intervention', 'stress OR burnout'. In addition to database searches, reference lists of selected papers were scanned, key authors were contacted and manual searches of key journals were conducted. RESULTS: The most effective interventions provided skills for coping with stressful situations (typically relaxation) and skills for changing maladaptive cognitions. Interventions which promoted skills to reduce the intensity or number of stressors were also successful. In most cases, stress interventions did not improve academic performance. CONCLUSION: The design of stress interventions should be driven by theory. Future studies should focus on interface and organizational factors and the long-term benefits of interventions for student nurses are yet to be demonstrated.
AIMS: To identify the types of interventions that are effective in reducing stress in student nurses, and to make recommendations for future research. BACKGROUND: Student nurses experience significant stress during their training and this may contribute to sickness, absence and attrition. Given the global shortage of nurses and high dropout rates amongst trainees, the importance for developing stress management programmes for student nurses is becoming more evident. To date, only one review has examined the effectiveness of stress interventions for student nurses, but the emergence of recent literature warrants a new review. DATA SOURCES: Research papers published between April 1981 and April 2008 were identified from the following databases: Medline, CINAHL, Behavioral Sciences Collection, IBSS and Psychinfo. REVIEW METHODS: A quantitative systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted. Key terms included 'nurses OR nursing OR nurse', 'student OR students', 'intervention', 'stress OR burnout'. In addition to database searches, reference lists of selected papers were scanned, key authors were contacted and manual searches of key journals were conducted. RESULTS: The most effective interventions provided skills for coping with stressful situations (typically relaxation) and skills for changing maladaptive cognitions. Interventions which promoted skills to reduce the intensity or number of stressors were also successful. In most cases, stress interventions did not improve academic performance. CONCLUSION: The design of stress interventions should be driven by theory. Future studies should focus on interface and organizational factors and the long-term benefits of interventions for student nurses are yet to be demonstrated.
Authors: Ryon C Mcdermott; Sharon M Fruh; Susan Williams; Caitlyn Hauff; Rebecca J Graves; Bernadette M Melnyk; Heather R Hall Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2020-10-03 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: Rodrigo Marques da Silva; Carolina Tonini Goulart; Luis Felipe Dias Lopes; Patrícia Maria Serrano; Ana Lucia Siqueira Costa; Laura de Azevedo Guido Journal: BMC Nurs Date: 2014-03-30
Authors: Marie Pierre Tavolacci; Joel Ladner; Sebastien Grigioni; Laure Richard; Herve Villet; Pierre Dechelotte Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 3.295