Maxine E Whelan1, Francesca Denton2,3, Claire L A Bourne4, Andrew P Kingsnorth2,3, Lauren B Sherar2,3,5, Mark W Orme4,6, Dale W Esliger2,3,5. 1. Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, UK. ad5094@coventry.ac.uk. 2. National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. 3. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. 4. Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, Leicester, UK. 5. NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Lifestyle, Leicestershire, UK. 6. Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mobile health technologies have advanced to now allow monitoring of the acute physiological responses to lifestyle behaviours. Our aim was to explore how people engaged with real-time feedback on their physical activity and glucose levels over several weeks. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 26 participants (61.5% female, 56.6 years) at moderate-to-high risk of developing type 2 diabetes were conducted. Interviews were completed after participants took part in an intervention comprising a flash glucose monitor (Freestyle Libre) and a physical activity monitor (Fitbit Charge 2). Purposive sampling ensured representation of ages, genders and group allocations. RESULTS: Inductive thematic analysis revealed how individuals intuitively used, interpreted and acted on feedback from wearable technologies. Six key themes emerged: triggers of engagement with the technologies, links between behaviour and health, lack of confidence, changes to movement behaviours, changes to diet and barriers to lifestyle behaviour change. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that accessing behavioural and physiological feedback can increase self-awareness of how lifestyle impacts short-term health. Some participants noticed a link between the feedback presented by the two devices and changed their behaviour but many did not. Training and educational support, as well as efforts to optimize how feedback is presented to users, are needed to sustain engagement and behaviour change. Extensions of this work to involve people with diabetes are also warranted to explore whether behavioural and physiological feedback in parallel can encourage better diabetes self-management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN17545949 , 12/05/2017, prospectively registered.
BACKGROUND: Mobile health technologies have advanced to now allow monitoring of the acute physiological responses to lifestyle behaviours. Our aim was to explore how people engaged with real-time feedback on their physical activity and glucose levels over several weeks. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 26 participants (61.5% female, 56.6 years) at moderate-to-high risk of developing type 2 diabetes were conducted. Interviews were completed after participants took part in an intervention comprising a flash glucose monitor (Freestyle Libre) and a physical activity monitor (Fitbit Charge 2). Purposive sampling ensured representation of ages, genders and group allocations. RESULTS: Inductive thematic analysis revealed how individuals intuitively used, interpreted and acted on feedback from wearable technologies. Six key themes emerged: triggers of engagement with the technologies, links between behaviour and health, lack of confidence, changes to movement behaviours, changes to diet and barriers to lifestyle behaviour change. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that accessing behavioural and physiological feedback can increase self-awareness of how lifestyle impacts short-term health. Some participants noticed a link between the feedback presented by the two devices and changed their behaviour but many did not. Training and educational support, as well as efforts to optimize how feedback is presented to users, are needed to sustain engagement and behaviour change. Extensions of this work to involve people with diabetes are also warranted to explore whether behavioural and physiological feedback in parallel can encourage better diabetes self-management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN17545949 , 12/05/2017, prospectively registered.
Authors: L J Gray; N A Taub; K Khunti; E Gardiner; S Hiles; D R Webb; B T Srinivasan; M J Davies Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Miren I Jones; Sheila M Greenfield; Emma P Bray; Sabrina Baral-Grant; F D Richard Hobbs; Roger Holder; Paul Little; Jonathan Mant; Satnam K Virdee; Bryan Williams; Richard J McManus Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Josie M M Evans; Dionne Mackison; Vivien Swanson; Peter T Donnan; Alistair Emslie-Smith; Julia Lawton Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Johanna Hortensius; Marijke C Kars; Willem S Wierenga; Nanne Kleefstra; Henk Jg Bilo; Jaap J van der Bijl Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 3.295