Literature DB >> 20653746

The Leicester Risk Assessment score for detecting undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose regulation for use in a multiethnic UK setting.

L J Gray1, N A Taub, K Khunti, E Gardiner, S Hiles, D R Webb, B T Srinivasan, M J Davies.   

Abstract

AIMS: Risk assessment scores identify those at high risk of impaired glucose regulation and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. To date no risk assessment scores that can be completed by a lay person have been developed and validated specifically for multiethnic populations in the UK.
METHODS: We used data on 6186 subjects aged 40-75 years from a multiethnic UK screening study (73% white European, 22% South Asian). All participants were given a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. We developed logistic regression models for predicting current impaired glucose regulation (impaired fasting glycaemia/impaired glucose tolerance) or Type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from anthropometric measurements and self-reported questionnaires. Using the best-fitting model, we developed the Leicester Risk Assessment score. We externally validated the score using data from 3171 subjects aged 40-75 years from a separate screening study.
RESULTS: The components of the final model are age, ethnicity [white European vs. other (predominantly South Asian)], sex, first degree family history of diabetes, antihypertensive therapy or history of hypertension, waist circumference and body mass index. The score ranges from 0 to 47. Validating this model using the data from the second screening study gave an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 72% (95% confidence interval, 69-74%). A cut point of 16 had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 45%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Leicester Risk Assessment score can be used to identify those at high risk of impaired glucose regulation and Type 2 diabetes mellitus in UK multiethnic populations. The score is simple (seven questions) and non-invasive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20653746     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  57 in total

1.  Different type 2 diabetes risk assessments predict dissimilar numbers at 'high risk': a retrospective analysis of diabetes risk-assessment tools.

Authors:  Benjamin J Gray; Richard M Bracken; Daniel Turner; Kerry Morgan; Michael Thomas; Sally P Williams; Meurig Williams; Sam Rice; Jeffrey W Stephens
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Screening score for early detection of cardio-metabolic risk in Indian adults.

Authors:  Deepa Pandit-Agrawal; Anuradha Khadilkar; Shashi Chiplonkar; Vaman Khadilkar; Vivek Patwardhan
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 3.  Nonpharmacological interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Peter E Schwarz; Colin J Greaves; Jaana Lindström; Thomas Yates; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Body weight reduction to avoid the excess risk of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wald; Jonathan P Bestwick; Joan K Morris
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Detection of impaired glucose regulation and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus, using primary care electronic data, in a multiethnic UK community setting.

Authors:  L J Gray; M J Davies; S Hiles; N A Taub; D R Webb; B T Srinivasan; K Khunti
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Bridging Income Generation with Group Integrated Care for cardiovascular risk reduction: Rationale and design of the BIGPIC study.

Authors:  Rajesh Vedanthan; Jemima H Kamano; Hana Lee; Benjamin Andama; Gerald S Bloomfield; Allison K DeLong; David Edelman; Eric A Finkelstein; Joseph W Hogan; Carol R Horowitz; Simon Manyara; Diana Menya; Violet Naanyu; Sonak D Pastakia; Thomas W Valente; Cleophas C Wanyonyi; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  Who should we target for diabetes prevention and diabetes risk reduction?

Authors:  Susann Blüher; Jana Markert; Sabine Herget; Thomas Yates; Melanie Davis; Gabriele Müller; Thomas Waldow; Peter E H Schwarz
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Diagnosing type 2 diabetes and identifying high-risk individuals using the new glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) criteria.

Authors:  Nitin N Gholap; Melanie J Davies; Samiul A Mostafa; Kamlesh Khunti
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 9.  Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Susan Mallett; Omar Omar; Ly-Mee Yu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Implementation of the automated Leicester Practice Risk Score in two diabetes prevention trials provides a high yield of people with abnormal glucose tolerance.

Authors:  L J Gray; K Khunti; C Edwardson; S Goldby; J Henson; D H Morris; D Sheppard; D Webb; S Williams; T Yates; M J Davies
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.