Literature DB >> 33434717

How effective was England's teenage pregnancy strategy? A comparative analysis of high-income countries.

Andrew J Baxter1, Ruth Dundas2, Frank Popham2, Peter Craig2.   

Abstract

Teenage pregnancy is associated with numerous health risks, both to mothers and infants, and may contribute to entrenched social inequalities. In countries with high rates of teenage pregnancy there is disagreement on effective action to reduce rates. England's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy, which cost £280 million over its ten year implementation period, has been highlighted as an effective way of reducing pregnancies after rates fell by more than 50% from 1998 to 2014 and widely advocated as a replicable model for other countries. However, it is not clear whether the fall is attributable to the strategy or to background trends and other events. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy on pregnancy and birth rates using comparators. We compared under-18 pregnancy rates in England with Scotland and Wales using interrupted time series methods. We compared under-18 birth rates and under-20 pregnancy rates in England with European and English-speaking high-income countries using synthetic control methods. In the controlled interrupted time series analyses, trends in rates of teenage pregnancy in England closely followed those in Scotland (0.08 fewer pregnancies per 1000 women per year in England; -0.74 to 0.59) and Wales (0.14 more pregnancies per 1000 women per year in England; -0.48 to 0.76). In synthetic control analyses, under-18 birth rates were very similar in England and the synthetic control. Under-20 pregnancy rates were marginally higher in England than control. Although teenage pregnancies and births in England fell following implementation of the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy, comparisons with other countries suggest the strategy had little, if any, effect on pregnancy rates. This raises doubts about whether the strategy should be used as a model for future public health interventions in countries aiming to reduce teenage pregnancy.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent pregnancy; Controlled interrupted time series; Policy evaluation; Synthetic control

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33434717      PMCID: PMC7895815          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   5.379


  35 in total

Review 1.  Addressing the mental health needs of pregnant and parenting adolescents.

Authors:  Stacy Hodgkinson; Lee Beers; Cathy Southammakosane; Amy Lewin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Is education the best contraception: the case of teenage pregnancy in England?

Authors:  Sourafel Girma; David Paton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements.

Authors:  Robert B Penfold; Fang Zhang
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 4.  Condom Availability Programs in Schools: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jack Andrzejewski; Nicole Liddon; Sandra Leonard
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2018-08-01

5.  Impact of a theoretically based sex education programme (SHARE) delivered by teachers on NHS registered conceptions and terminations: final results of cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  M Henderson; D Wight; G M Raab; C Abraham; A Parkes; S Scott; G Hart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-11-21

6.  Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Evangelos Kontopantelis; Tim Doran; David A Springate; Iain Buchan; David Reeves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-09

7.  Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.

Authors:  James Lopez Bernal; Steven Cummins; Antonio Gasparrini
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 8.  Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research.

Authors:  Peter Craig; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Alastair Leyland; Frank Popham
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  Exploring Explanations for Local Reductions in Teenage Pregnancy Rates in England: An Approach Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Tim Blackman
Journal:  Soc Policy Soc       Date:  2013-01

10.  The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

Authors:  Kaye Wellings; Kyle G Jones; Catherine H Mercer; Clare Tanton; Soazig Clifton; Jessica Datta; Andrew J Copas; Bob Erens; Lorna J Gibson; Wendy Macdowall; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew Phelps; Anne M Johnson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can additional funding improve mental health outcomes? Evidence from a synthetic control analysis of California's millionaire tax.

Authors:  Michael Thom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.