Literature DB >> 33434463

Whose trait is it anyways? Coevolution of joint phenotypes and genetic architecture in mutualisms.

Anna M O'Brien1, Chandra N Jack2, Maren L Friesen2,3, Megan E Frederickson1.   

Abstract

Evolutionary biologists typically envision a trait's genetic basis and fitness effects occurring within a single species. However, traits can be determined by and have fitness consequences for interacting species, thus evolving in multiple genomes. This is especially likely in mutualisms, where species exchange fitness benefits and can associate over long periods of time. Partners may experience evolutionary conflict over the value of a multi-genomic trait, but such conflicts may be ameliorated by mutualism's positive fitness feedbacks. Here, we develop a simulation model of a host-microbe mutualism to explore the evolution of a multi-genomic trait. Coevolutionary outcomes depend on whether hosts and microbes have similar or different optimal trait values, strengths of selection and fitness feedbacks. We show that genome-wide association studies can map joint traits to loci in multiple genomes and describe how fitness conflict and fitness feedback generate different multi-genomic architectures with distinct signals around segregating loci. Partner fitnesses can be positively correlated even when partners are in conflict over the value of a multi-genomic trait, and conflict can generate strong mutualistic dependency. While fitness alignment facilitates rapid adaptation to a new optimum, conflict maintains genetic variation and evolvability, with implications for applied microbiome science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coevolution; host-microbiome; mutualism; quantitative genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33434463      PMCID: PMC7892427          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  57 in total

1.  Association mapping reveals the role of purifying selection in the maintenance of genomic variation in gene expression.

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; Young Wha Lee; John R Stinchcombe; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of temporal fluctuation of selection coefficient on gene frequency in a population.

Authors:  N Takahata; K Ishii; H Matsuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The role of epistatic gene interactions in the response to selection and the evolution of evolvability.

Authors:  Ashley J R Carter; Joachim Hermisson; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Explaining mutualism variation: a new evolutionary paradox?

Authors:  Katy D Heath; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms.

Authors:  M Doebeli; N Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; John R Stinchcombe; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 7.  Rethinking mutualism stability: cheaters and the evolution of sanctions.

Authors:  Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  Microbiome composition shapes rapid genomic adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Seth M Rudman; Sharon Greenblum; Rachel C Hughes; Subhash Rajpurohit; Ozan Kiratli; Dallin B Lowder; Skyler G Lemmon; Dmitri A Petrov; John M Chaston; Paul Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mutual visual signalling between the cleaner shrimp Ancylomenes pedersoni and its client fish.

Authors:  Eleanor M Caves; Patrick A Green; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium exploits inflammation to compete with the intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Bärbel Stecher; Riccardo Robbiani; Alan W Walker; Astrid M Westendorf; Manja Barthel; Marcus Kremer; Samuel Chaffron; Andrew J Macpherson; Jan Buer; Julian Parkhill; Gordon Dougan; Christian von Mering; Wolf-Dietrich Hardt
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interacting phenotypes and the coevolutionary process: Interspecific indirect genetic effects alter coevolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Daniel I Bolnick; Edmund D Brodie; Allen J Moore; Joel W McGlothlin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Symbiont-conferred immunity interacts with effects of parasitoid genotype and intraguild predation to affect aphid immunity in a clone-specific fashion.

Authors:  Samuel Alexander Purkiss; Mouhammad Shadi Khudr; Oscar Enrique Aguinaga; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-19

3.  Phenotypic and genomic signatures of interspecies cooperation and conflict in naturally occurring isolates of a model plant symbiont.

Authors:  Rebecca T Batstone; Liana T Burghardt; Katy D Heath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 4.  Scent of a Symbiont: The Personalized Genetic Relationships of Rhizobium-Plant Interaction.

Authors:  Lisa Cangioli; Francesca Vaccaro; Margherita Fini; Alessio Mengoni; Camilla Fagorzi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.