Literature DB >> 33434203

Comparison of four low-cost carbapenemase detection tests and a proposal of an algorithm for early detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in resource-limited settings.

Wirittamulla Gamage Maheshika Kumudunie1, Lakmini Inoka Wijesooriya2, Yasanandana Supunsiri Wijayasinghe1.   

Abstract

Rapidly progressing antibiotic resistance is a great challenge in therapy. In particular, the infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are exceedingly difficult to treat. Carbapenemase production is the predominant mechanism of resistance in CRE. Early and accurate identification of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) is extremely important for the treatment and prevention of such infections. In the present study, four phenotypic carbapenemase detection tests were compared and an algorithm was developed for rapid and cost-effective identification of CP-CRE. A total of 117 Enterobacteriaceae (54 CP-CRE, 3 non-CP-CRE, and 60 non-CRE) isolates were tested for carbapenemase production using modified Hodge test (MHT), modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), Carba NP test (CNPt), and CNPt-direct test. The overall sensitivity/specificity values were 90.7%/92.1% for MHT, 100%/100% for mCIM, 75.9%/100% for CNPt, and 83.3%/100% for CNPt-direct. OXA-48-like enzymes were detected with 93.2% sensitivity by MHT and >77.3% sensitivity by two Carba NP tests. MHT could only detect half of the NDM carbapenemase producers. CNPt-direct exhibited enhanced sensitivity compared to CNPt (100% vs 25%) for detection of NDM producers. Considering these findings we propose CNPt-direct as the first test followed by mCIM for rapid detection of CP-CRE. With this algorithm >80% of the CP-CRE could be detected within 24 hours from the time the sample is received and 100% CP-CRE could be detected in day two. In conclusion, mCIM was the most sensitive assay for the identification of CP-CRE. CNPt-direct performed better than CNPt. An algorithm consisting CNPt-direct and mCIM allows rapid and reliable detection of carbapenemase production in resource-limited settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33434203      PMCID: PMC7802922          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  38 in total

Review 1.  Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P Nordmann; M Gniadkowski; C G Giske; L Poirel; N Woodford; V Miriagou
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Evaluation of the Carba NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Nathalie Tijet; David Boyd; Samir N Patel; Michael R Mulvey; Roberto G Melano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Non-molecular detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates.

Authors:  A Aguirre-Quiñonero; L Martínez-Martínez
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.211

4.  Evaluation of the Carba NP test for carbapenemase detection.

Authors:  Monica Osterblad; Antti J Hakanen; Jari Jalava
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Counting the cost of an outbreak of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an economic evaluation from a hospital perspective.

Authors:  J A Otter; P Burgess; F Davies; S Mookerjee; J Singleton; M Gilchrist; D Parsons; E T Brannigan; J Robotham; A H Holmes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Evaluation of the modified carbapenem inactivation method for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Tomokazu Kuchibiro; Masaru Komatsu; Katsutoshi Yamasaki; Tatsuya Nakamura; Hisaaki Nishio; Isao Nishi; Keigo Kimura; Makoto Niki; Tamotsu Ono; Noriyuki Sueyoshi; Machiko Kita; Kaneyuki Kida; Masanobu Ohama; Kaori Satoh; Hirofumi Toda; Tetsu Mizutani; Nozomi Fukuda; Kana Sawa; Isako Nakai; Tomomi Kofuku; Tamaki Orita; Hideo Watari; Satoshi Shimura; Saori Fukuda; Akihiro Nakamura; Yasunao Wada
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.211

7.  Accuracy and applicability of different phenotypic methods for carbapenemase detection in Enterobacteriaceae: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong Zhong; Meng-Lu Wu; Wen-Juan Feng; Shi-Feng Huang; Ping Yang
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  EDTA-Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method: a Phenotypic Method for Detecting Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M M Sfeir; J A Hayden; K A Fauntleroy; C Mazur; J K Johnson; P J Simner; S Das; M J Satlin; S G Jenkins; L F Westblade
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Deaths attributable to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Giannoula S Tansarli; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 10.  Present and Future of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Infections.

Authors:  Beatriz Suay-García; María Teresa Pérez-Gracia
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-19
View more
  7 in total

1.  To Be or Not to Be an OXA-48 Carbapenemase.

Authors:  Laura Dabos; Saoussen Oueslati; Sandrine Bernabeu; Rémy A Bonnin; Laurent Dortet; Thierry Naas
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  Multi Evaluation of a Modified GoldNano Carb Test for Carbapenemase Detection in Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Authors:  Arpasiri Srisrattakarn; Aroonlug Lulitanond; Nicha Charoensri; Lumyai Wonglakorn; Suthida Kenprom; Chutipapa Sukkasem; Waewta Kuwatjanakul; Sirikan Piyapatthanakul; Onphailin Luanphairin; Wichuda Phukaw; Kunthida Khanchai; Jantira Pasuram; Chotechana Wilailuckana; Jureerut Daduang; Aroonwadee Chanawong
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Multimodal Interventions to Prevent and Control Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Producer-Associated Infections at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Egypt.

Authors:  Noha A Kamel; Khaled M Elsayed; Mohamed F Awad; Khaled M Aboshanab; Mervat I El Borhamy
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30

4.  Comparison of the Performance of Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Zhijie Zhang; Dayan Wang; Yahui Li; Yong Liu; Xiaosong Qin
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  Genetic Diversity, Carbapenem Resistance Genes, and Biofilm Formation in UPEC Isolated from Patients with Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in North of Iran.

Authors:  Sina Nasrollahian; Mehrdad Halaji; Akramasadat Hosseini; Mohammad Teimourian; Mojtaba Taghizadeh Armaki; Mehdi Rajabnia; Hemmat Gholinia; Abazar Pournajaf
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.149

6.  Correlation between the Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Susceptibility to Antibiotics among the Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens.

Authors:  Salma M Abdelaziz; Khaled M Aboshanab; Ibrahim S Yahia; Mahmoud A Yassien; Nadia A Hassouna
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04

7.  Performance Evaluation of Diagnostic Assays for Detection and Classification of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms.

Authors:  Anru Zhang; Xiaojuan Wang; Xinyue Liang; Chaoe Zhou; Qi Wang; Jiangang Zhang; Hui Wang
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.