Importance: Lung cancer incidence and mortality disproportionately affect women and racial/ethnic minority populations, yet screening guidelines for the past several years were derived from clinical trials of predominantly White men. To reflect current evidence, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has revised the eligibility criteria, which may help to ameliorate sex- and race/ethnicity-related disparities in lung cancer screening. Objective: To determine the changes associated with the revised USPSTF guideline for lung cancer screening eligibility among female, Black, and Hispanic populations using a large nationwide survey. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included respondents to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System who were 50 to 80 years of age with a smoking history in 19 states that used the optional lung cancer screening module. The change in eligibility among female, male, Black, Hispanic, and White participants was examined. Eligibility by sex and race/ethnicity was compared with a reference population. Data were collected from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018, and analyzed from May 8 to June 11, 2020. Exposures: Self-reported sex, race/ethnicity, age, and smoking history. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lung cancer screening eligibility using the revised USPSTF criteria. The previous criteria included current or past smokers (within 15 years) who were 55 to 80 years of age and had a smoking history of more than 30 pack-years. In the revised criteria, age was modified to 50 to 80 years; smoking history, to 20 pack-years. Results: Among 40 869 respondents aged 50 to 80 years with a smoking history, 21 265 (52.0%) were women, 3430 (8.4%) were Black, and 1226 (30.0%) were Hispanic (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [7.9] years). The revised criteria increased eligibility for the following populations: men (29.4% to 38.3% [8.9% difference]; P < .001), women (25.9% to 36.4% [10.5% difference]; P < .001), White individuals (31.1% to 40.9% [9.8% difference]; P < .001), Black individuals (16.3% to 28.8% [12.5% difference]; P < .001), and Hispanic individuals (10.5% to 18.7% [8.2% difference]; P < .001). The odds of eligibility were lower for women compared with men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; P = .04) and for Black (AOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.33-0.56; P < .001) and Hispanic populations (AOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.80; P < .001) compared with the White population. Conclusions and Relevance: The revised USPSTF guideline may likely increase lung cancer screening rates for female, Black, and Hispanic populations. However, despite these potential improvements, lung cancer screening inequities may persist without tailored eligibility criteria.
Importance: Lung cancer incidence and mortality disproportionately affect women and racial/ethnic minority populations, yet screening guidelines for the past several years were derived from clinical trials of predominantly White men. To reflect current evidence, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has revised the eligibility criteria, which may help to ameliorate sex- and race/ethnicity-related disparities in lung cancer screening. Objective: To determine the changes associated with the revised USPSTF guideline for lung cancer screening eligibility among female, Black, and Hispanic populations using a large nationwide survey. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included respondents to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System who were 50 to 80 years of age with a smoking history in 19 states that used the optional lung cancer screening module. The change in eligibility among female, male, Black, Hispanic, and White participants was examined. Eligibility by sex and race/ethnicity was compared with a reference population. Data were collected from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018, and analyzed from May 8 to June 11, 2020. Exposures: Self-reported sex, race/ethnicity, age, and smoking history. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lung cancer screening eligibility using the revised USPSTF criteria. The previous criteria included current or past smokers (within 15 years) who were 55 to 80 years of age and had a smoking history of more than 30 pack-years. In the revised criteria, age was modified to 50 to 80 years; smoking history, to 20 pack-years. Results: Among 40 869 respondents aged 50 to 80 years with a smoking history, 21 265 (52.0%) were women, 3430 (8.4%) were Black, and 1226 (30.0%) were Hispanic (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [7.9] years). The revised criteria increased eligibility for the following populations: men (29.4% to 38.3% [8.9% difference]; P < .001), women (25.9% to 36.4% [10.5% difference]; P < .001), White individuals (31.1% to 40.9% [9.8% difference]; P < .001), Black individuals (16.3% to 28.8% [12.5% difference]; P < .001), and Hispanic individuals (10.5% to 18.7% [8.2% difference]; P < .001). The odds of eligibility were lower for women compared with men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; P = .04) and for Black (AOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.33-0.56; P < .001) and Hispanic populations (AOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.80; P < .001) compared with the White population. Conclusions and Relevance: The revised USPSTF guideline may likely increase lung cancer screening rates for female, Black, and Hispanic populations. However, despite these potential improvements, lung cancer screening inequities may persist without tailored eligibility criteria.
Authors: Chien-Ching Li; Alicia K Matthews; Mantle M Rywant; Emily Hallgren; Raj C Shah Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Li C Cheung; Christine D Berg; Philip E Castle; Hormuzd A Katki; Anil K Chaturvedi Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Juan P Wisnivesky; Thomas McGinn; Claudia Henschke; Paul Hebert; Michael C Iannuzzi; Ethan A Halm Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-02-25 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; Katherine M Dains; Delia Dempsey; Margaret Wilson; Peyton Jacob Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Hormuzd A Katki; Stephanie A Kovalchik; Martin Tammemagi; Christine D Berg; Neil E Caporaso; Tom L Riley; Mary Korch; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melinda C Aldrich; Sarah F Mercaldo; Kim L Sandler; William J Blot; Eric L Grogan; Jeffrey D Blume Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Dorothy K Hatsukami; Eric C Donny; Gideon St Helen; Neal L Benowitz; Jennifer Ko; Peyton Jacob; Steven E Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sharon E Murphy; Stephen S Hecht Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Randi M Williams; Tengfei Li; George Luta; Min Qi Wang; Lucile Adams-Campbell; Rafael Meza; Martin C Tammemägi; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Randi M Williams; Samuel A Kareff; Paul Sackstein; Tina Roy; George Luta; Chul Kim; Kathryn L Taylor; Martin C Tammemägi Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 6.081
Authors: Subhashini A Sellers; Andrew Edmonds; Catalina Ramirez; Sushma K Cribbs; Igho Ofotokun; Laurence Huang; Alison Morris; Meredith C Mccormack; Ken M Kunisaki; Gypsyamber D'souza; M Patricia Rivera; M Bradley Drummond; Adaora A Adimora Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 3.771
Authors: Polina V Kukhareva; Tanner J Caverly; Haojia Li; Hormuzd A Katki; Li C Cheung; Thomas J Reese; Guilherme Del Fiol; Rachel Hess; David W Wetter; Yue Zhang; Teresa Y Taft; Michael C Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Rafael Meza; Jihyoun Jeon; Evelyn Jimenez-Mendoza; Yoonseo Mok; Pianpian Cao; Kristie L Foley; Caroline Chiles; Jamie S Ostroff; Paul M Cinciripini; Jennifer Minnix; Nancy A Rigotti; Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn Taylor; Randi M Williams; Benjamin A Toll; Anne M Joseph Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Wei Liao; Nicholas R Faris; Meghan Meadows-Taylor; Carrie Fehnel; Jordan Lane; Sara C Williams; Anita A Patel; Olawale A Akinbobola; Alicia Pacheco; Amanda Epperson; Joy Luttrell; Denise McCoy; Laura McHugh; Raymond Signore; Anna M Bishop; Keith Tonkin; Robert Optican; Jeffrey Wright; Todd Robbins; Meredith A Ray; Matthew P Smeltzer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Shailesh Advani; Dongyu Zhang; Martin Tammemagi; Tomi Akinyemiju; Michael K Gould; Gerard A Silvestri; Dejana Braithwaite Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2021-11