Literature DB >> 34424342

Implementing lung cancer screening in primary care: needs assessment and implementation strategy design.

Thomas J Reese1, Chelsey R Schlechter2,3, Heidi Kramer4, Polina Kukhareva4, Charlene R Weir4, Guilherme Del Fiol4, Tanner Caverly5, Rachel Hess2, Michael C Flynn6, Teresa Taft4, Kensaku Kawamoto4.   

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (CT) could help avert thousands of deaths each year. Since the implementation of screening is complex and underspecified, there is a need for systematic and theory-based strategies. Explore the implementation of lung cancer screening in primary care, in the context of integrating a decision aid into the electronic health record. Design implementation strategies that target hypothesized mechanisms of change and context-specific barriers. The study had two phases. The Qualitative Analysis phase included semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians to elicit key task behaviors (e.g., ordering a low-dose CT) and understand the underlying behavioral determinants (e.g., social influence). The Implementation Strategy Design phase consisted of defining implementation strategies and hypothesizing causal pathways to improve screening with a decision aid. Three key task behaviors and four behavioral determinants emerged from 14 interviews. Implementation strategies were designed to target multiple levels of influence. Strategies included increasing provider self-efficacy toward performing shared decision making and using the decision aid, improving provider performance expectancy toward ordering a low-dose CT, increasing social influence toward performing shared decision making and using the decision aid, and addressing key facilitators to using the decision aid. This study contributes knowledge about theoretical determinants of key task behaviors associated with lung cancer screening. We designed implementation strategies according to causal pathways that can be replicated and tested at other institutions. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies and to determine the contexts in which they can be effectively applied. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision support; Eligibility; Implementation strategy; Lung cancer; Screening; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34424342      PMCID: PMC8848991          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.626


  59 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas; G MacLennan; C Fraser; C R Ramsay; L Vale; P Whitty; M P Eccles; L Matowe; L Shirran; M Wensing; R Dijkstra; C Donaldson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Identify Patients Likely to Benefit from Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Abbie Begnaud; Joseph Leishman; Tanner J Caverly
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Elisa Koppelman; Rendelle Bolton; Karen E Lasser; Belinda Borrelli; David H Au; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Hasmeena Kathuria
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemägi; Hormuzd A Katki; William G Hocking; Timothy R Church; Neil Caporaso; Paul A Kvale; Anil K Chaturvedi; Gerard A Silvestri; Tom L Riley; John Commins; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Evaluating Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Teri L Malo; Marjorie Margolis; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Shynah James; Maihan B Vu; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  A national survey of primary care physicians: Perceptions and practices of low-dose CT lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Karen Kane McDonnell; Erica Sercy; Samira Khan; Scott M Strayer; Amy C Dievendorf; Reginald F Munden; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-05-22

9.  From Classification to Causality: Advancing Understanding of Mechanisms of Change in Implementation Science.

Authors:  Cara C Lewis; Predrag Klasnja; Byron J Powell; Aaron R Lyon; Leah Tuzzio; Salene Jones; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Bryan Weiner
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 10.  Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Dominick L Frosch; Sarah Kobrin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation in Life Cycle of Information Technology (ELICIT) framework: Supporting the innovation life cycle from business case assessment to summative evaluation.

Authors:  Polina V Kukhareva; Charlene Weir; Guilherme Del Fiol; Gregory A Aarons; Teresa Y Taft; Chelsey R Schlechter; Thomas J Reese; Rebecca L Curran; Claude Nanjo; Damian Borbolla; Catherine J Staes; Keaton L Morgan; Heidi S Kramer; Carole H Stipelman; Julie H Shakib; Michael C Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Conceptualizing clinical decision support as complex interventions: a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Thomas J Reese; Siru Liu; Bryan Steitz; Allison McCoy; Elise Russo; Brian Koh; Jessica Ancker; Adam Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

3.  Implementation of a Web-Based Tool for Shared Decision-making in Lung Cancer Screening: Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Evaluation.

Authors:  Julie Lowery; Angela R Larkin; Sarah E Skurla; Tanner J Caverly; Angela Fagerlin; Renda S Wiener
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.

Authors:  Polina V Kukhareva; Tanner J Caverly; Haojia Li; Hormuzd A Katki; Li C Cheung; Thomas J Reese; Guilherme Del Fiol; Rachel Hess; David W Wetter; Yue Zhang; Teresa Y Taft; Michael C Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.942

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.