Literature DB >> 33431900

Early prediction of live birth for assisted reproductive technology patients: a convenient and practical prediction model.

Hong Gao1,2, Dong-E Liu3, Yumei Li3, Xinrui Wu2, Hongzhuan Tan4.   

Abstract

Live birth is the most important concern for assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients. Therefore, in the medical reproductive centre, obstetricians often need to answer the following question: "What are the chances that I will have a healthy baby after ART treatment?" To date, our obstetricians have no reference on which to base the answer to this question. Our research aimed to solve this problem by establishing prediction models of live birth for ART patients. Between January 1, 2010, and May 1, 2017, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing ART treatment at the Reproductive Medicine Centre, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Hunan, China. The birth of at least one live-born baby per initiated cycle or embryo transfer procedure was defined as a live birth, and all other pregnancy outcomes were classified as no live birth. A live birth prediction model was established by stepwise multivariate logistic regression. All eligible subjects were randomly allocated to two groups: group 1 (80% of subjects) for the establishment of the prediction models and group 2 (20% of subjects) for the validation of the established prediction models. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each prediction model at different cut-off values were calculated. The prediction model of live birth included nine variables. The area under the ROC curve was 0.743 in the validation group. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the established model ranged from 97.9-24.8%, 7.2-96.3%, 44.8-83.8% and 81.7-62.5%, respectively, at different cut-off values. A stable, reliable, convenient, and satisfactory prediction model for live birth by ART patients was established and validated, and this model could be a useful tool for obstetricians to predict the live rate of ART patients. Meanwhile, it is also a reference for obstetricians to create good conditions for infertility patients in preparation for pregnancy.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33431900      PMCID: PMC7801433          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79308-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  22 in total

1.  Deep phenotyping to predict live birth outcomes in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Prajna Banerjee; Bokyung Choi; Lora K Shahine; Sunny H Jun; Kathleen O'Leary; Ruth B Lathi; Lynn M Westphal; Wing H Wong; Mylene W M Yao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Serum progesterone trend after day of transfer predicts live birth in fresh IVF cycles.

Authors:  Jennifer K Blakemore; Jason D Kofinas; David H McCulloh; Jamie Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Anti-müllerian hormone levels are associated with live birth rates in ART, but the predictive ability of anti-müllerian hormone is modest.

Authors:  Sara S E Alson; Leif J Bungum; Aleksander Giwercman; Emir Henic
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Mid-luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist support in frozen-thawed embryo transfers during artificial cycles: A prospective interventional pilot study.

Authors:  Jaana Seikkula; Katja Ahinko; Päivi Polo-Kantola; Leena Anttila; Saija Hurme; Helena Tinkanen; Varpu Jokimaa
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 5.  Metabolomics as a tool to identify biomarkers to predict and improve outcomes in reproductive medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Timothy Bracewell-Milnes; Srdjan Saso; Hossam Abdalla; Dimitrios Nikolau; Julian Norman-Taylor; Mark Johnson; Elaine Holmes; Meen-Yau Thum
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.610

6.  Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.

Authors:  R H Goldman; C Racowsky; L V Farland; S Munné; L Ribustello; J H Fox
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The influence of age, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and anti-Mullerian hormone level on clinical pregnancy rates in ART.

Authors:  Andre Amsiejiene; Grazina Drasutiene; Audrone Usoniene; Janina Tutkuviene; Saule Vilsinskaite; Liucija Barskutyte
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 8.  The predictive accuracy of anti-Müllerian hormone for live birth after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Stamatina Iliodromiti; Thomas W Kelsey; Olivia Wu; Richard A Anderson; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Overall Blastocyst Quality, Trophectoderm Grade, and Inner Cell Mass Grade Predict Pregnancy Outcome in Euploid Blastocyst Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Yan-Yu Zhao; Yang Yu; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Predicting the chance of live birth for women undergoing IVF: a novel pretreatment counselling tool.

Authors:  R K Dhillon; D J McLernon; P P Smith; S Fishel; K Dowell; J J Deeks; S Bhattacharya; A Coomarasamy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comprehensive Analysis of Global Research on Human Varicocele: A Scientometric Approach.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Renata Finelli; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Kristian Leisegang; Ralf Henkel; Gianmaria Salvio; Azin Aghamajidi; Pallav Sengupta; Luís Crisóstomo; Petroula A Tsioulou; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Federica Finocchi; Mahsa Darbandi; Filomena Mottola; Sara Darbandi; Concetta Iovine; Marianna Santonastaso; Himasadat Zaker; Kavindra Kumar Kesari; Amir Nomanzadeh; Nivita Gugnani; Amarnath Rambhatla; Mesut Berkan Duran; Erman Ceyhan; Hussein Kandil; Mohamed Arafa; Ramadan Saleh; Rupin Shah; Edmund Ko; Florence Boitrelle
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.494

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.