Literature DB >> 33431646

Ethical climate in contemporary paediatric intensive care.

Katie M Moynihan1,2,3, Lisa Taylor4, Liz Crowe5, Mary-Claire Balnaves6, Helen Irving3,7, Al Ozonoff2,8, Robert D Truog9,10, Melanie Jansen3,11.   

Abstract

Ethical climate (EC) has been broadly described as how well institutions respond to ethical issues. Developing a tool to study and evaluate EC that aims to achieve sustained improvements requires a contemporary framework with identified relevant drivers. An extensive literature review was performed, reviewing existing EC definitions, tools and areas where EC has been studied; ethical challenges and relevance of EC in contemporary paediatric intensive care (PIC); and relevant ethical theories. We surmised that existing EC definitions and tools designed to measure it fail to capture nuances of the PIC environment, and sought to address existing gaps by developing an EC framework for PIC founded on ethical theory. In this article, we propose a Paediatric Intensive Care Ethical Climate (PICEC) conceptual framework and four measurable domains to be captured by an assessment tool. We define PICEC as the collective felt experience of interdisciplinary team members arising from those factors that enable or constrain their ability to navigate ethical aspects of their work. PICEC both results from and is influenced by how well ethical issues are understood, identified, explored, reflected on, responded to and addressed in the workplace. PICEC encompasses four, core inter-related domains representing drivers of EC including: (1) organisational culture and leadership; (2) interdisciplinary team relationships and dynamics; (3) integrated child and family-centred care; and (4) ethics literacy. Future directions involve developing a PICEC measurement tool, with implications for benchmarking as well as guidance for, and evaluation of, targeted interventions to foster a healthy EC. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; ethics committees/consultation; health care for specific diseases/groups; health personnel; interests of health personnel/institutions

Year:  2021        PMID: 33431646     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of an Instrument to Measure Interdisciplinary Staff Perceptions of Quality of Dying and Death in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Valerie Bailey; Dorothy M Beke; Jennifer M Snaman; Faraz Alizadeh; Sarah Goldberg; Melissa Smith-Parrish; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Elizabeth D Blume; Katie M Moynihan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Clinical ethics support services in paediatric practice: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review on structures, interventions and outcomes.

Authors:  Mariana Dittborn; Bernardita Portales; Joe Brierley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A cross-sectional survey of moral distress and ethical climate - Situations in paediatric oncology care that involve children's voices.

Authors:  Päivi Ventovaara; Margareta Af Sandeberg; Gitte Petersen; Klas Blomgren; Pernilla Pergert
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  The Meaning Given to Bioethics as a Source of Support by Physicians Who Care for Children Who Require Long-Term Ventilation.

Authors:  Denise Alexander; Mary B Quirke; Carmel Doyle; Katie Hill; Kate Masterson; Maria Brenner
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2022-03-29

5.  Fostering a just culture in healthcare organizations: experiences in practice.

Authors:  Eva van Baarle; Laura Hartman; Sven Rooijakkers; Iris Wallenburg; Jan-Willem Weenink; Roland Bal; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.908

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.