Germaine Tuyisenge1,2, Valorie A Crooks3, Nicole S Berry4. 1. Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. gtuyisen@sfu.ca. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. gtuyisen@sfu.ca. 3. Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing men's involvement in their pregnant partners' wellness has been reported as one of the ways to improve access to and utilization of maternal health services, including birth preparedness and complication readiness. Men can play meaningful roles in the support systems that pregnant women need to achieve better maternal health outcomes. In Rwanda, the roles that men take vary, resulting in diverse expectations and responsibilities to support the health of women during this critical time. In this study, we aimed to examine the views, perspectives, and experiences of women on men's involvement in maternal health and how this impacts access and utilization of maternal health services. METHODS: We conducted 21 interviews with pregnant and recently-pregnant women to gain an understanding of their views on men's involvement in facilitating their partners' health during pregnancy. Interviews were conducted across five Rwandan districts in both rural and urban settings of the country. Data analysis was guided by a thematic analysis approach. This started with independent transcript review by the investigators, after which a meeting was held to discuss emergent themes and to identify potential codes. A coding scheme was created and transcripts were coded in NVIVO™ software according to conceptual and practical topics that formed an understanding of men's involvement in maternal care. RESULTS: Three key themes emerged during the analytic process that categorize the specific roles that men play in maternal health: 1) facilitating access to maternal health services, which involves assisting women with getting and or attending appointments jointly with men; 2) supporting women's decisions, wherein men can support the decisions women make with regard to their maternal healthcare in a number of ways; and 3) evaluating information, including gathering information from multiple sources, especially from community health workers, to assist women with making informed decisions. CONCLUSION: Rwandan men take on three types of roles in supporting women's maternal health, and their responsibilities are experienced differently by women. Interventions involving men are encouraged to increase their understanding of the implications of their involvement in maternal health without compromising women's autonomy in decision-making and to promote positive maternal health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Increasing men's involvement in their pregnant partners' wellness has been reported as one of the ways to improve access to and utilization of maternal health services, including birth preparedness and complication readiness. Men can play meaningful roles in the support systems that pregnant women need to achieve better maternal health outcomes. In Rwanda, the roles that men take vary, resulting in diverse expectations and responsibilities to support the health of women during this critical time. In this study, we aimed to examine the views, perspectives, and experiences of women on men's involvement in maternal health and how this impacts access and utilization of maternal health services. METHODS: We conducted 21 interviews with pregnant and recently-pregnant women to gain an understanding of their views on men's involvement in facilitating their partners' health during pregnancy. Interviews were conducted across five Rwandan districts in both rural and urban settings of the country. Data analysis was guided by a thematic analysis approach. This started with independent transcript review by the investigators, after which a meeting was held to discuss emergent themes and to identify potential codes. A coding scheme was created and transcripts were coded in NVIVO™ software according to conceptual and practical topics that formed an understanding of men's involvement in maternal care. RESULTS: Three key themes emerged during the analytic process that categorize the specific roles that men play in maternal health: 1) facilitating access to maternal health services, which involves assisting women with getting and or attending appointments jointly with men; 2) supporting women's decisions, wherein men can support the decisions women make with regard to their maternal healthcare in a number of ways; and 3) evaluating information, including gathering information from multiple sources, especially from community health workers, to assist women with making informed decisions. CONCLUSION: Rwandan men take on three types of roles in supporting women's maternal health, and their responsibilities are experienced differently by women. Interventions involving men are encouraged to increase their understanding of the implications of their involvement in maternal health without compromising women's autonomy in decision-making and to promote positive maternal health outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision-making; Gender; Low- and middle- income countries; Maternal health; Perceptions; Rwanda
Authors: Germaine Tuyisenge; Celestin Hategeka; Isaac Luginaah; Yolanda Babenko-Mould; David Cechetto; Stephen Rulisa Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-08
Authors: Agnes Binagwaho; Paul E Farmer; Sabin Nsanzimana; Corine Karema; Michel Gasana; Jean de Dieu Ngirabega; Fidele Ngabo; Claire M Wagner; Cameron T Nutt; Thierry Nyatanyi; Maurice Gatera; Yvonne Kayiteshonga; Cathy Mugeni; Placidie Mugwaneza; Joseph Shema; Parfait Uwaliraye; Erick Gaju; Marie Aimee Muhimpundu; Theophile Dushime; Florent Senyana; Jean Baptiste Mazarati; Celsa Muzayire Gaju; Lisine Tuyisenge; Vincent Mutabazi; Patrick Kyamanywa; Vincent Rusanganwa; Jean Pierre Nyemazi; Agathe Umutoni; Ida Kankindi; Christian Ntizimira; Hinda Ruton; Nathan Mugume; Denis Nkunda; Espérance Ndenga; Joel M Mubiligi; Jean Baptiste Kakoma; Etienne Karita; Claude Sekabaraga; Emmanuel Rusingiza; Michael L Rich; Joia S Mukherjee; Joseph Rhatigan; Corrado Cancedda; Didi Bertrand-Farmer; Gene Bukhman; Sara N Stulac; Neo M Tapela; Cassia van der Hoof Holstein; Lawrence N Shulman; Antoinette Habinshuti; Matthew H Bonds; Michael S Wilkes; Chunling Lu; Mary C Smith-Fawzi; JaBaris D Swain; Michael P Murphy; Alan Ricks; Vanessa B Kerry; Barbara P Bush; Richard W Siegler; Cori S Stern; Anne Sliney; Tej Nuthulaganti; Injonge Karangwa; Elisabetta Pegurri; Ophelia Dahl; Peter C Drobac Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Monica Okuga; Margaret Kemigisa; Sarah Namutamba; Gertrude Namazzi; Peter Waiswa Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Elizabeth K Harrington; Erin E McCoy; Alison L Drake; Daniel Matemo; Grace John-Stewart; John Kinuthia; Jennifer A Unger Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Dan K Kaye; Othman Kakaire; Annettee Nakimuli; Michael O Osinde; Scovia N Mbalinda; Nelson Kakande Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Babacar Ndiaye; Louis Thiam; Gahee Ham; Yunsung Choi; Eunmi Lee; Kilho Kang; Youngran Yang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390