| Literature DB >> 26199068 |
Chinelo C Okigbo1,2, Ilene S Speizer3,4, Meghan Corroon5, Abdou Gueye6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Family planning (FP) researchers and policy makers have often overlooked the importance of involving men in couples' fertility choices and contraception, despite the fact that male involvement is a vital factor in sexual and reproductive health programming. This study aimed to assess whether men's exposure to FP demand-generation activities is associated with their reported use of modern contraceptive methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26199068 PMCID: PMC4508879 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-015-0056-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Urban Reproductive Health Initiative demand-generation activities in the three countries
| URHI demand generation program activities: In the past year, | Kenya | Nigeria | Senegal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tupange | NURHI | ISSU | |
| Listened to any URHI radio programs | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Saw any URHI television programs | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Participated in any URHI community events | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Exposed to any URHI print mediaα | ✓ | – | – |
| Exposed to any URHI logos/brands | ✓ | ✓ | – |
| Heard/saw any URHI English slogans | – | ✓ | – |
| Heard/saw any URHI local language slogans | – | ✓ | – |
| Heard a religious leader speak in favor of family planning | – | – | ✓ |
| Heard at least one URHI radio advert on family planning | – | – | ✓ |
| Total number of demand generation program activities | 5 | 6 | 5 |
URHI Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, NURHI Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, ISSU l’Initiative Sénégalaise de Santé Urbaine
αTupange program print media includes newspaper, magazine, comic books, posters, leaflets, and brochures
Sociodemographic characteristics of men aged 15–59 in the three countries
| Characteristics | Kenya (%) | Nigeria (%) | Senegal (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||
| 15–24 | 27.5 | 26.8 | 31.8 |
| 25–34 | 34.3 | 30.6 | 31.8 |
| 35–44 | 21.9 | 22.9 | 21.1 |
| 45–59 | 16.3 | 19.7 | 15.3 |
| Education | |||
| Primary or less | 42.0 | 14.9 | 55.7 |
| Secondary | 37.3 | 53.5 | 36.1 |
| Higher | 20.7 | 31.6 | 8.2 |
| Marital status | |||
| Single/divorced/widowed | 39.7 | 42.6 | 56.3 |
| Married/living together | 60.3 | 57.4 | 43.7 |
| Religion | |||
| Christian/Others | 64.7 | 47.0 | 5.4 |
| Muslim | 35.3 | 53.0 | 94.6 |
| Wealth index | |||
| Poorest | 21.3 | 20.0 | 25.0 |
| Poor | 22.7 | 19.8 | 18.9 |
| Middle | 21.3 | 20.0 | 19.0 |
| Rich | 17.7 | 20.5 | 18.3 |
| Richest | 17.0 | 19.7 | 18.8 |
| City of residence (Nigeria/Senegal) | |||
| Ibadan / Guédiawaye | – | 52.4 | 32.1 |
| Kaduna / Pikine | – | 47.6 | 33.0 |
| NA / Mbao | – | – | 34.9 |
| Weighted N | 696 | 2311 | 1613 |
All analyses are weighted (across-city weights were used in Nigeria and Senegal)
Proportion of men aged 15–59 exposed to country-specific demand-generation in the three countries
| Exposure to programs’ demand-generation activities | Kenya | Nigeria | Senegal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tupange (%) | NURHI (%) | ISSU (%) | |
| Listened to any URHI radio programs | 24.1 | 22.9 | 51.4 |
| Saw any URHI television programs | 34.7 | 52.9 | 50.5 |
| Participated in any URHI community events | 23.2 | 26.2 | 8.4 |
| Exposed to any URHI print media materials a | 51.9 | na | |
| Exposed to any URHI logos/brands | 71.2 | 29.8 | na |
| Heard/saw any URHI English slogans b | na | 33.7 | na |
| Heard/saw any URHI local language slogans c | na | 53.9 | na |
| Heard a religious leader speak in favor of family planning | na | na | 29.5 |
| Heard at least one URHI radio spot/publicity | na | na | 55.8 |
| Exposure to at least one URHI activity | 84.8 | 81.2 | 79.9 |
| Weighted N | 696 | 2311 | 1613 |
All analyses are weighted (cross-city weights were used in Nigeria and Senegal)
URHI Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, NURHI Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, ISSU l’Initiative Sénégalaise de Santé Urbaine, na not available in country’s program
aTupange program print media includes: newspaper, magazine, comic books, posters, leaflets, and brochures
bNURHI’s English slogans: “Get it together”, “know talk go”, “no dulling”
cNURHI’s local language (Yoruba and Hausa) slogans: “se o jasi”, “mo ti feto si”, “ki la siri ewa re—ifeto somo bibi lasiri ewa mi”, “ko ku gane, tazaran haihuwa”
Proportion of men aged 15–59 years using modern contraception in in the three countries
| Characteristics | Kenya (%) | Nigeria (%) | Senegal (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current modern method use a, b | |||
| Yes | 58.0 | 42.7 | 26.6 |
| No | 42.0 | 57.3 | 73.4 |
| Weighted N | 696 | 2311 | 1613 |
| Type of modern method c, a, b | |||
| Male condom | 34.4 | 49.7 | 53.9 |
| Male sterilization | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Female sterilization | 5.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Daily pills | 8.1 | 4.8 | 19.3 |
| Injections | 23.7 | 25.4 | 13.0 |
| Implant | 8.2 | 1.5 | 7.8 |
| Intrauterine device | 3.8 | 5.6 | 2.8 |
| Female condom | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.1 |
| Emergency pills | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Diaphragm/gel/foams | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Lactational amenorrhea | 0.0 | 1.8 | |
| Standard days method | 15.2 | 6.5 | 0.5 |
| Weighted N | 403 | 986 | 429 |
All analyses are weighted (across-city weights were used in Nigeria and Senegal)
aCity-level differences in Nigeria statistically significant at p < 0.05
bCity-level differences in Senegal statistically significant at p < 0.05
camong modern method users
Regression of modern contraceptive method use on demand-generation activities in the three countries
| Exposure to program demand generation activities | Kenya | Nigeria | Senegal |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % C.I.) | OR (95 % C.I.) | OR (95 % C.I.) | |
| Listened to any URHI radio programs | 1.36 (0.57–3.24) | 0.80 (0.58–1.12) | 1.41 (0.98–2.04)Ɨ |
| Saw any URHI television programs | 0.58 (0.33–1.01)Ɨ | 0.91 (0.71–1.18) | 1.40 (1.03–1.89)* |
| Participated in any URHI community events | 3.70 (1.97–6.97)*** | 1.19 (0.93–1.53) | 1.14 (0.71–1.81) |
| Exposed to any URHI print media a | 1.02 (0.60–1.75) | na | na |
| Exposed to any URHI logos/brands | 1.05 (0.64–1.74) | 1.31 (0.94–1.83) | na |
| Heard/saw any URHI English slogans b | na | 1.39 (0.97–2.01)Ɨ | na |
| Heard/saw any URHI local language slogans c | na | 0.92 (0.72–1.17) | na |
| Heard a religious leader speak in favor of family planning | na | na | 1.72 (1.25–2.38)** |
| Heard at least one URHI radio spot/advert on family planning | na | na | 1.29 (0.94–1.77) |
All analyses are weighted (across-city weights were used in Nigeria and Senegal). Models include all country-specific program exposure variables controlling for the sociodemographic variables, which are respondents’ age, education, marital status, wealth, religion, and city of residence
OR Odds Ratio, 95 % C.I. 95 % Confidence Interval, URHI Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, na not available in country’s program
aTupange program print media includes: newspaper, magazine, comic books, posters, leaflets, and brochures
bNURHI’s English slogans: “Get it together”, “know talk go”, “no dulling”
cNURHI’s local language (Yoruba and Hausa) slogans: “se o jasi”, “mo ti feto si”, “ki la siri ewa re—ifeto somo bibi lasiri ewa mi”, “ko ku gane, tazaran haihuwa”
Ɨ p < 0.10; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Regression of modern contraception on intensity of program exposure in the three countries
| Kenya | Nigeria | Senegal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tupange | NURHI | ISSU | |
| Mean number of program activities exposed to (SD; Range) | 2.1 (1.4; 0–5) | 2.2 (1.6; 0–6) | 2.0 (1.4; 0–5) |
| Model 1: OR (95 % C.I.) | 1.20 (0.98–1.48)* | 1.08 (0.98–1.19)Ɨ | 1.49 (1.32–1.69)** |
| Model 2: OR (95 % C.I.) | 1.15 (0.92–1.44) | 1.07 (0.98–1.17) | 1.41 (1.25–1.60)** |
All analyses are weighted (cross-city weights were used in Nigeria and Senegal)
Model 1-unadjusted (bivariate) logistic regression
Model 2-adjusted logistic regression i.e. intensity of program exposure controlling for sociodemographic variables, which include respondents’ age, education, marital status, wealth, religion, and city
OR Odds Ratio; 95 % C.I. 95 % Confidence Interval, NURHI Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, ISSU l’Initiative Sénégalaise de Santé Urbaine
*p < 0.10; **p < 0.001