Literature DB >> 3343100

Visual fields of infants assessed with a new perimetric technique.

D L Mayer1, A B Fulton, M F Cummings.   

Abstract

The visual field of normal infants was assessed using a perimeter with LED stimuli and a forced-choice observation procedure. Central fixation was elicited by four central, pulsing LEDs and maintained with the aid of auditory stimuli. Field extent was derived from the four-alternative, forced-choice judgments of an adult who observed the infant's eye movements to peripherally illuminated LEDs. The binocular visual field of infants, ages 6-7 months, was similar to that of adults tested with the same apparatus. Area of the infants' binocular field was 93% that of the adults'. However, the infants' monocular fields were smaller than those of adults, averaging 74% of the adults' monocular field area. This may have been due to the distracting effect on infant behavior of the adhesive patch used for monocular testing. The visual fields of a young patient with hydrocephalus illustrate the potential clinical utility of this new perimetric technique for infants at risk of field defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3343100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  Visual field loss in children with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Alki Liasis; Bronwen Walters; Dorothy Thompson; Kate Smith; Richard Hayward; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Unravelling the development of the visual cortex: implications for plasticity and repair.

Authors:  James A Bourne
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Infants plan prehension while pivoting.

Authors:  Kasey C Soska; Jaya Rachwani; Claes von Hofsten; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.

Authors:  Stephanie Wilscher; Bettina Wabbels; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Visual behaviours of neurologically impaired children with cerebral visual impairment: an ethological study.

Authors:  G Porro; E M Dekker; O Van Nieuwenhuizen; D Wittebol-Post; M B Schilder; A J Schenk-Rootlieb; W F Treffers
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Pediatric Perimeter-A Novel Device to Measure Visual Fields in Infants and Patients with Special Needs.

Authors:  PremNandhini Satgunam; Sourav Datta; Koteswararao Chillakala; Karthik R Bobbili; Dhruv Joshi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Development of a Pediatric Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Marco A Miranda; David B Henson; Cecilia Fenerty; Susmito Biswas; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Antonios Perperidis; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Ian C Murray; Harry M Brash; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  The Detection of Face-like Stimuli at the Edge of the Infant Visual Field.

Authors:  Chiara Capparini; Michelle P S To; Vincent M Reid
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-13

10.  Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.