Literature DB >> 21279364

Visual field loss in children with craniosynostosis.

Alki Liasis1, Bronwen Walters, Dorothy Thompson, Kate Smith, Richard Hayward, Ken K Nischal.   

Abstract

AIMS: To identify visual field deficits in a group of children with syndromic craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Kinetic visual field examination and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in 16 children with syndromic craniosynostosis as part of their ophthalmic evaluation. VEPs were analyzed for inter-hemispheric asymmetries and component amplitude and latency, while visual fields were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively.
RESULTS: All children with craniosynostosis were found to have visual field deficits compared to controls. In the Crouzon group, deficits tended to involve the nasal field, while infero-nasal field deficits were the most consistent finding in children with Apert syndrome. Children with Pfeiffer's demonstrated the greatest deficits, with severe constrictions affecting the whole visual field. VEPs were asymmetrical in four cases while the P100 component was subnormal in ten of the 16 patients for either amplitude and/or latency.
CONCLUSION: Although we may speculate about the mechanisms that cause visual field deficits, we currently are unable to explain the reason for the differing types and extent of visual field loss in the different syndromic groups. We can conclude that the visual field deficits do indicate previous or ongoing visual dysfunction that cannot be monitored employing central vision tests alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279364     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-010-1378-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  32 in total

1.  Sustained raised intracranial pressure implicated only by pattern reversal visual evoked potentials after cranial vault expansion surgery.

Authors:  Alki Liasis; Dorothy A Thompson; Richard Hayward; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.162

2.  Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in craniosynostotic syndromes.

Authors:  Tien Tay; Frank Martin; Neil Rowe; Kim Johnson; Michael Poole; Kimberley Tan; Ian Kennedy; Mark Gianoutsos
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  How low can you go? Intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and respiratory obstruction in children with complex craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Richard Hayward; Sonia Gonsalez
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Incidence of increased intracranial pressure after early surgical treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  I F Pollack; H W Losken; A W Biglan
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.162

Review 5.  Skull vault growth in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Spyros Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Venous hypertension and craniosynostosis.

Authors:  R Hayward
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Visual fields of infants assessed with a new perimetric technique.

Authors:  D L Mayer; A B Fulton; M F Cummings
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The optic nerve in children with craniosynostosis. A pre and post surgical evaluation.

Authors:  S Gupta; S Ghose; M Rohatgi; A Kumar; A Das
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 9.  The loss of visual function in glaucoma.

Authors:  P A Sample; C F Bosworth; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.975

10.  A light microscopic, autoradiographic study of axoplasmic transport in the optic nerve head during ocular hypotony, increased intraocular pressure, and papilledema.

Authors:  D S Minckler; M O Tso; L E Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  1 in total

1.  Age at Craniosynostosis Surgery and Its Impact on Ophthalmologic Diagnoses: A Single-Center Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Alexis D Vick; Russell E Ettinger; Steven M Archer; Christian J Vercler; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.730

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.