Literature DB >> 33430969

Global histone protein surface accessibility in yeast indicates a uniformly loosely packed genome with canonical nucleosomes.

Luke T Marr1, Josefina Ocampo2, David J Clark3, Jeffrey J Hayes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of methods available to characterize genome-wide chromatin structure exploit differences in DNA accessibility to nucleases or chemical crosslinking. We developed a novel method to gauge genome-wide accessibility of histone protein surfaces within nucleosomes by assessing reactivity of engineered cysteine residues with a thiol-specific reagent, biotin-maleimide (BM).
RESULTS: Yeast nuclei were obtained from cells expressing the histone mutant H2B S116C, in which a cysteine resides near the center of the external flat protein surface of the nucleosome. BM modification revealed that nucleosomes are generally equivalently accessible throughout the S. cerevisiae genome, including heterochromatic regions, suggesting limited, higher-order chromatin structures in which this surface is obstructed by tight nucleosome packing. However, we find that nucleosomes within 500 bp of transcription start sites exhibit the greatest range of accessibility, which correlates with the density of chromatin remodelers. Interestingly, accessibility is not well correlated with RNA polymerase density and thus the level of gene expression. We also investigated the accessibility of cysteine mutations designed to detect exposure of histone surfaces internal to the nucleosome thought to be accessible in actively transcribed genes: H3 102, is at the H2A-H2B dimer/H3-H4 tetramer interface, and H3 A110C, resides at the H3-H3 interface. However, in contrast to the external surface site, we find that neither of these internal sites were found to be appreciably exposed.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our finding that nucleosomes surfaces within S. cerevisiae chromatin are equivalently accessible genome-wide is consistent with a globally uncompacted chromatin structure lacking substantial higher-order organization. However, we find modest differences in accessibility that correlate with chromatin remodelers but not transcription, suggesting chromatin poised for transcription is more accessible than actively transcribed or intergenic regions. In contrast, we find that two internal sites remain inaccessible, suggesting that such non-canonical nucleosome species generated during transcription are rapidly and efficiently converted to canonical nucleosome structure and thus not widely present in native chromatin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromatin structure; Remodelers; Subnucleosome; Transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430969      PMCID: PMC7802155          DOI: 10.1186/s13072-020-00381-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin        ISSN: 1756-8935            Impact factor:   4.954


  119 in total

1.  A histone variant, Htz1p, and a Sir1p-like protein, Esc2p, mediate silencing at HMR.

Authors:  N Dhillon; R T Kamakaka
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Genome-wide location and regulated recruitment of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex.

Authors:  Huck Hui Ng; François Robert; Richard A Young; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Removal of promoter nucleosomes by disassembly rather than sliding in vivo.

Authors:  Hinrich Boeger; Joachim Griesenbeck; J Seth Strattan; Roger D Kornberg
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Mechanism of transcriptional silencing in yeast.

Authors:  Lingyi Chen; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Mediator influences telomeric silencing and cellular life span.

Authors:  Xuefeng Zhu; Beidong Liu; Jonas O P Carlsten; Jenny Beve; Thomas Nyström; Lawrence C Myers; Claes M Gustafsson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Yeast chromatin structure.

Authors:  J O Thomas; V Furber
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1976-07-15       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription.

Authors:  Michael J Carrozza; Bing Li; Laurence Florens; Tamaki Suganuma; Selene K Swanson; Kenneth K Lee; Wei-Jong Shia; Scott Anderson; John Yates; Michael P Washburn; Jerry L Workman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Transcriptional silencing at Saccharomyces telomeres: implications for other organisms.

Authors:  Wai-Hong Tham; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Nucleosome accessibility governed by the dimer/tetramer interface.

Authors:  Vera Böhm; Aaron R Hieb; Andrew J Andrews; Alexander Gansen; Andrea Rocker; Katalin Tóth; Karolin Luger; Jörg Langowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Accessibility of promoter DNA is not the primary determinant of chromatin-mediated gene regulation.

Authors:  Răzvan V Chereji; Peter R Eriksson; Josefina Ocampo; Hemant K Prajapati; David J Clark
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of gene regulation by histone degradation in adaptation of yeast: an overview of recent advances.

Authors:  Safir Ullah Khan; Munir Ullah Khan; Fadia Kalsoom; Muhammad Imran Khan; Shuang Gao; Ahsanullah Unar; Muhammad Zubair; Muhammad Bilal
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.552

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.