Literature DB >> 33430810

Longitudinal analysis of cell-free mutated KRAS and CA 19-9 predicts survival following curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

Saskia Hussung1,2, Dilara Akhoundova2, Julian Hipp3, Marie Follo1, Rhena F U Klar1, Ulrike Philipp1, Florian Scherer1, Nikolas von Bubnoff1, Justus Duyster1,4,5, Melanie Boerries4,5,6,7, Uwe Wittel3, Ralph M Fritsch8,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Novel biomarkers and molecular monitoring tools hold potential to improve outcome for patients following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that the combined longitudinal analysis of mutated cell-free plasma KRAS (cfKRASmut) and CA 19-9 during adjuvant treatment and follow-up might more accurately predict disease course than hitherto available parameters.
METHODS: Between 07/2015 and 10/2018, we collected 134 plasma samples from 25 patients after R0/R1-resection of PDAC during adjuvant chemotherapy and post-treatment surveillance at our institution. Highly sensitive discriminatory multi-target ddPCR assays were employed to screen plasma samples for cfKRASmut. cfKRASmut and CA 19-9 dynamics were correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were followed-up until 01/2020.
RESULTS: Out of 25 enrolled patients, 76% had undergone R0 resection and 48% of resected PDACs were pN0. 17/25 (68%) of patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 22.0 months, with 19 out of 25 (76%) patients relapsing during study period. Median RFS was 10.0 months, median OS was 22.0 months. Out of clinicopathologic variables, only postoperative CA 19-9 levels and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with survival endpoints. cfKRASmut. was detected in 12/25 (48%) of patients, and detection of high levels inversely correlated with survival endpoint. Integration of cfKRASmut and CA 19-9 levels outperformed either individual marker. cfKRASmut outperformed CA 19-9 as dynamic marker since increase during adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up was highly predictive of early relapse and poor OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated analysis of cfKRASmut and CA 19-9 levels is a promising approach for molecular monitoring of patients following resection of PDAC. Larger prospective studies are needed to further develop this approach and dissect each marker's specific potential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free DNA (cfDNA); Circulating KRAS (cfKRAS mut); Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR); Liquid biopsy; Molecular monitoring; Pancreatic cancer; Prognostic biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430810      PMCID: PMC7802224          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07736-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  47 in total

Review 1.  Circulating free DNA in plasma or serum as biomarker of carcinogenesis: practical aspects and biological significance.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Gormally; Elodie Caboux; Paolo Vineis; Pierre Hainaut
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Luis A Diaz; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Oncogenic NRG1 Fusions: A New Hope for Targeted Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Aguirre
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  The diagnostic importance of CEA and CA 19-9 for the early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  O Nazli; A D Bozdag; T Tansug; R Kir; E Kaymak
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer--a survey.

Authors:  M Fleischhacker; B Schmidt
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-10-07

6.  Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies.

Authors:  Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne R Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M Alani; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Nilofer S Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L Cameron; Clarence C Lee; Leslie A Fecher; Gary L Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H Juhl; Jenny J Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A Laheru; Calogero Lauricella; Michael Lim; Evan J Lipson; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; George J Netto; Kelly S Oliner; Alessandro Olivi; Louise Olsson; Gregory J Riggins; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Kerstin Schmidt; le-Ming Shih; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Salvatore Siena; Dan Theodorescu; Jeanne Tie; Timothy T Harkins; Silvio Veronese; Tian-Li Wang; Jon D Weingart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood; Dongmei Xing; Ralph H Hruban; Jian Wu; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chandrajit P Raut; Jennifer F Tseng; Charlotte C Sun; Huamin Wang; Robert A Wolff; Christopher H Crane; Rosa Hwang; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Recurrent somatic BRAF insertion (p.V504_R506dup): a tumor marker and a potential therapeutic target in pilocytic astrocytoma.

Authors:  Fida Khater; Sylvie Langlois; Pauline Cassart; Anne-Marie Roy; Mathieu Lajoie; Jasmine Healy; Chantal Richer; Pascal St-Onge; Nelson Piché; Sebastien Perreault; Sonia Cellot; Monia Marzouki; Nada Jabado; Daniel Sinnett
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 9.  The emerging role of cell-free DNA as a molecular marker for cancer management.

Authors:  Abel Jacobus Bronkhorst; Vida Ungerer; Stefan Holdenrieder
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2019-03-18

10.  Consensus in determining the resectability of locally progressed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - results of the Conko-007 multicenter trial.

Authors:  U A Wittel; D Lubgan; M Ghadimi; O Belyaev; W Uhl; W O Bechstein; R Grützmann; W M Hohenberger; A Schmid; L Jacobasch; R S Croner; A Reinacher-Schick; U T Hopt; A Pirkl; H Oettle; R Fietkau; H Golcher
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas-López; Rocío Olivera-Salazar; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 2.  Circulating tumour DNA: a challenging innovation to develop "precision onco-surgery" in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Pietrasz; Elisabetta Sereni; Francesco Lancelotti; Antonio Pea; Claudio Luchini; Giulio Innamorati; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 3.  Is Cell-Free DNA Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Ankur Sheel; Sarah Addison; Surya Pratik Nuguru; Ashish Manne
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.