Literature DB >> 33430793

Monitoring sick leave data for early detection of influenza outbreaks.

Tom Duchemin1,2, Jonathan Bastard3,4,5,6, Pearl Anne Ante-Testard3,5, Rania Assab3, Oumou Salama Daouda3, Audrey Duval3,4,6,7, Jérôme-Philippe Garsi3, Radowan Lounissi8, Narimane Nekkab3,9, Helene Neynaud3, David R M Smith3,4,6, William Dab3, Kevin Jean3,5, Laura Temime3,5, Mounia N Hocine3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Workplace absenteeism increases significantly during influenza epidemics. Sick leave records may facilitate more timely detection of influenza outbreaks, as trends in increased sick leave may precede alerts issued by sentinel surveillance systems by days or weeks. Sick leave data have not been comprehensively evaluated in comparison to traditional surveillance methods. The aim of this paper is to study the performance and the feasibility of using a detection system based on sick leave data to detect influenza outbreaks.
METHODS: Sick leave records were extracted from private French health insurance data, covering on average 209,932 companies per year across a wide range of sizes and sectors. We used linear regression to estimate the weekly number of new sick leave spells between 2016 and 2017 in 12 French regions, adjusting for trend, seasonality and worker leaves on historical data from 2010 to 2015. Outbreaks were detected using a 95%-prediction interval. This method was compared to results from the French Sentinelles network, a gold-standard primary care surveillance system currently in place.
RESULTS: Using sick leave data, we detected 92% of reported influenza outbreaks between 2016 and 2017, on average 5.88 weeks prior to outbreak peaks. Compared to the existing Sentinelles model, our method had high sensitivity (89%) and positive predictive value (86%), and detected outbreaks on average 2.5 weeks earlier.
CONCLUSION: Sick leave surveillance could be a sensitive, specific and timely tool for detection of influenza outbreaks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Influenza; Outbreak detection; Sick-leave; Surveillance

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430793      PMCID: PMC7799403          DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05754-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


  18 in total

1.  Framework for evaluating public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks: recommendations from the CDC Working Group.

Authors:  James W Buehler; Richard S Hopkins; J Marc Overhage; Daniel M Sosin; Van Tong
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2004-05-07

2.  Timeliness of data sources used for influenza surveillance.

Authors:  Lynne Dailey; Rochelle E Watkins; Aileen J Plant
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group.

Authors:  R R German; L M Lee; J M Horan; R L Milstein; C A Pertowski; M N Waller
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2001-07-27

4.  Methods for current statistical analysis of excess pneumonia-influenza deaths.

Authors:  Robert E Serfling
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  A routine tool for detection and assessment of epidemics of influenza-like syndromes in France.

Authors:  D Costagliola; A Flahault; D Galinec; P Garnerin; J Menares; A J Valleron
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of health service based indicators for the surveillance of influenza A epidemics.

Authors:  P Quenel; W Dab; C Hannoun; J M Cohen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Syndromic surveillance in public health practice, New York City.

Authors:  Richard Heffernan; Farzad Mostashari; Debjani Das; Adam Karpati; Martin Kulldorff; Don Weiss
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Performances of statistical methods for the detection of seasonal influenza epidemics using a consensus-based gold standard.

Authors:  C Souty; R Jreich; Y LE Strat; C Pelat; P Y Boëlle; C Guerrisi; S Masse; T Blanchon; T Hanslik; C Turbelin
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Influenza forecasting with Google Flu Trends.

Authors:  Andrea Freyer Dugas; Mehdi Jalalpour; Yulia Gel; Scott Levin; Fred Torcaso; Takeru Igusa; Richard E Rothman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A review of influenza detection and prediction through social networking sites.

Authors:  Ali Alessa; Miad Faezipour
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.432

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Influenza surveillance systems using traditional and alternative sources of data: A scoping review.

Authors:  Aspen Hammond; John J Kim; Holly Sadler; Katelijn Vandemaele
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.