| Literature DB >> 33430460 |
Hatice Kumru1,2,3, África Flores4, María Rodríguez-Cañón4, Victor R Edgerton1,5, Loreto García1,2,3, Jesús Benito-Penalva1,2,3, Xavier Navarro1,4, Yury Gerasimenko6,7, Guillermo García-Alías1,4, Joan Vidal1,2,3.
Abstract
Electrical enabling motor control (eEmc) through transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation is a non-invasive method that can modify the functional state of the sensory-motor system. We hypothesize that eEmc delivery, together with hand training, improves hand function in healthy subjects more than either intervention alone by inducing plastic changes at spinal and cortical levels. Ten voluntary participants were included in the following three interventions: (i) hand grip training, (ii) eEmc, and (iii) eEmc with hand training. Functional evaluation included the box and blocks test (BBT) and hand grip maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), spinal and cortical motor evoked potential (sMEP and cMEP), and resting motor thresholds (RMT), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and F wave in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. eEmc combined with hand training retained MVC and increased F wave amplitude and persistency, reduced cortical RMT and facilitated cMEP amplitude. In contrast, eEmc alone only increased F wave amplitude, whereas hand training alone reduced MVC and increased cortical RMT and SICI. In conclusion, eEmc combined with hand grip training enhanced hand motor output and induced plastic changes at spinal and cortical level in healthy subjects when compared to either intervention alone. These data suggest that electrical neuromodulation changes spinal and, perhaps, supraspinal networks to a more malleable state, while a concomitant use-dependent mechanism drives these networks to a higher functional state.Entities:
Keywords: cervical spinal cord; combined intervention; hand training; neuromodulation; transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33430460 PMCID: PMC7827883 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964