Eva Pila1, Benjamin D Sylvester2, Liz Corson3, Caroline Folkman3, Katarina L Huellemann4, Catherine M Sabiston5. 1. School of Kinesiology, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada. epila@uwo.ca. 2. Department of National Defence, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3. Toronto Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. School of Kinesiology, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada. 5. Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Public health interventions for adolescent "obesity prevention" have focused predominantly on individualistic health behaviours (e.g., diet and physical activity) at the expense of recognizing body weight diversity and the array of social factors (e.g., stigma and discrimination of marginalized identities) that may be linked to weight status. Research is needed to examine the extent to which individualistic health behaviours versus social factors contribute to weight status in adolescents. As such, the aim of this study was to investigate the relative contribution of individualistic health behaviours versus social factors to objective and perceptual indices of weight status. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data were collected as part of the Toronto Public Health Student Survey and comprised students 12 to 19 years of age (N = 5515). Measures included perceived and objective weight status, social and demographic factors (e.g., gender, sexual orientation, school connectedness), and health behaviours (e.g., physical activity, nutritious consumption). RESULTS: Findings from latent variable regression models partially supported hypotheses, whereby social factors (i.e., age, sex, socio-economic access, sexual minority status) contribute similar amounts of variance, or relatively more variance in weight indices, compared to health behaviours (e.g., physical activity, nutritious consumption). CONCLUSION: Contrary to traditional views of adolescent weight status, physical activity (i.e., school-based, individual, active transport) and nutritious consumption (i.e., fruits, vegetables, milk) were not associated with weight status, when considering social factors. These findings challenge the utility of public health approaches that target individualistic behaviours as critical risk factors in "obesity prevention" efforts in adolescence.
OBJECTIVES: Public health interventions for adolescent "obesity prevention" have focused predominantly on individualistic health behaviours (e.g., diet and physical activity) at the expense of recognizing body weight diversity and the array of social factors (e.g., stigma and discrimination of marginalized identities) that may be linked to weight status. Research is needed to examine the extent to which individualistic health behaviours versus social factors contribute to weight status in adolescents. As such, the aim of this study was to investigate the relative contribution of individualistic health behaviours versus social factors to objective and perceptual indices of weight status. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data were collected as part of the Toronto Public Health Student Survey and comprised students 12 to 19 years of age (N = 5515). Measures included perceived and objective weight status, social and demographic factors (e.g., gender, sexual orientation, school connectedness), and health behaviours (e.g., physical activity, nutritious consumption). RESULTS: Findings from latent variable regression models partially supported hypotheses, whereby social factors (i.e., age, sex, socio-economic access, sexual minority status) contribute similar amounts of variance, or relatively more variance in weight indices, compared to health behaviours (e.g., physical activity, nutritious consumption). CONCLUSION: Contrary to traditional views of adolescent weight status, physical activity (i.e., school-based, individual, active transport) and nutritious consumption (i.e., fruits, vegetables, milk) were not associated with weight status, when considering social factors. These findings challenge the utility of public health approaches that target individualistic behaviours as critical risk factors in "obesity prevention" efforts in adolescence.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health behaviour; Obesity; Weight perception; Youth
Authors: Harry Rutter; Maira Bes-Rastrollo; Stefaan de Henauw; Marjaana Lahti-Koski; Susanna Lehtinen-Jacks; Dana Mullerova; Finn Rasmussen; Aila Rissanen; Tommy L S Visscher; Lauren Lissner Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Meghan M Sinton; Andrea B Goldschmidt; Vandana Aspen; Kelly R Theim; Richard I Stein; Brian E Saelens; Leonard H Epstein; Denise E Wilfley Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2011-06-22
Authors: Anne Claire Grammer; Meghan E Byrne; Arielle T Pearlman; David A Klein; Natasha A Schvey Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Meghan L Butryn; Thomas A Wadden; Margaret R Rukstalis; Chanelle Bishop-Gilyard; Melissa S Xanthopoulos; Delroy Louden; Robert I Berkowitz Journal: J Obes Date: 2011-01-02
Authors: Tracy L Tylka; Rachel A Annunziato; Deb Burgard; Sigrún Daníelsdóttir; Ellen Shuman; Chad Davis; Rachel M Calogero Journal: J Obes Date: 2014-07-23