Literature DB >> 33427669

Web-Based Patient Self-Reported Outcome After Radiotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Survey on Acceptance of Digital Tools.

Marco M E Vogel1,2, Kerstin A Eitz1,2,3, Stephanie E Combs1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: eHealth and mobile health (mHealth) are an evolving trend in the medical field. The acceptance of digital tools is high, and the need is growing.
OBJECTIVE: Young adults (18-40 years) confronted with a cancer diagnosis present unique needs and require special care. They often have a strong affinity and are familiar with modern technology. On that account, we implemented a web-based symptom and quality of life (QoL) assessment to address patients' attitudes and willingness to use mHealth tools. The study also aims to evaluate sociodemographic parameters that could influence patients' opinions.
METHODS: A total of 380 young patients aged 18-40 treated with radiotherapy between 2002 and 2017 were included in the trial. We assessed QoL via the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Core 30 (EORTC C30) questionnaire and added general questions about mHealth technology. The added questions inquired patients' opinions regarding general aspects, including technical advances in medicine, mobile and app assistance during cancer treatment, data transfer, and app-specific features. The survey was conducted for 12 months. Participation was voluntary and pseudonymized; prior written consent was obtained.
RESULTS: We achieved a participation rate of 57.6% (219/380) and a completion rate of 50.2% (110/219). The median age was 33 years (range 18-40). Of all participants, 89.1% (98/110) considered new technologies in medicine as positive; 10.9% (12/110) answered with neutral. Nearly all patients (96.4%, 106/110) stated that they would send further data via a web-based platform. Of all, 96.4% (106/110) considered the provided pseudonymization of their data as safe. We further asked the patients if they would use a mobile app for symptom and QoL assessment similar to the present web-based system: 74.5% (82/110) answered with yes and 25.5% (28/110) said they would not use a mobile app in the future. We tested the willingness to use an app on several sociodemographic parameters, such as age, gender, education, health insurance status, and cancer-related parameters: tumor stage, time since radiation treatment, and treatment intention. None of these parameters correlated with app use in this group of young adults. Patients who were generally positive regarding using an app rated several possible functions of a future app. The 3 most requested features were appointment reminders (89.0%, 73/82), contact overview of all involved clinics and physicians (87%, 71/82), and making an appointment via app (78%, 64/82).
CONCLUSIONS: eHealth and mHealth tools should be available as an integrated part of a comprehensive cancer care approach. It provides automated, thorough documentation of health parameters during therapy and follow-up for doctors, medical staff, and tumor patients to optimize treatment. With this study, we could show that young adults are the ideal patient population to use eHealth/mHealth tools. Such tools offer further digital support and improve the patients' need for constant QoL during cancer care. ©Marco M E Vogel, Kerstin A Eitz, Stephanie E Combs. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 11.01.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eHealth; mHealth; young adults

Year:  2021        PMID: 33427669      PMCID: PMC7834941          DOI: 10.2196/19727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  34 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in Assessing Mobile Health App Quality: A Systematic Review of Prevalent and Innovative Methods.

Authors:  Quinn H Grundy; Zhicheng Wang; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Smartphone Technology and Text Messaging for Weight Loss in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Janna D Stephens; Allison M Yager; Jerilyn Allen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 4.  Systematic review of the health-related quality of life issues facing adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  Samantha C Sodergren; Olga Husson; Jessica Robinson; Gudrun E Rohde; Iwona M Tomaszewska; Bella Vivat; Rebecca Dyar; Anne-Sophie Darlington
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  mHealth and Application Technology Supporting Clinical Trials: Today's Limitations and Future Perspective of smartRCTs.

Authors:  Marco M E Vogel; Stephanie E Combs; Kerstin A Kessel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions.

Authors:  Sarah J Iribarren; Kenrick Cato; Louise Falzon; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire.

Authors:  Marieke van Leeuwen; Olga Husson; Paola Alberti; Juan Ignacio Arraras; Olivier L Chinot; Anna Costantini; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Linda Dirven; Martin Eichler; Eva B Hammerlid; Bernhard Holzner; Colin D Johnson; Meropi Kontogianni; Trille Kristina Kjær; Ofir Morag; Sandra Nolte; Andrew Nordin; Andrea Pace; Monica Pinto; Katja Polz; John Ramage; Jaap C Reijneveld; Samantha Serpentini; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Vassilios Vassiliou; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Ingvild Vistad; Teresa E Young; Neil K Aaronson; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Patient reported outcomes can improve performance status assessment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Marcella May; Joseph E Schwartz; Ming Li; Aaron Mejia; Luciano Nocera; Anand Kolatkar; Naoto T Ueno; Sriram Yennu; Jerry S H Lee; Sean E Hanlon; Frankie A Cozzens Philips; Cyrus Shahabi; Peter Kuhn; Jorge Nieva
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-07-16

9.  The effective use of telemedicine to save lives and maintain structure in a healthcare system: Current response to COVID-19.

Authors:  Adel Elkbuli; Haley Ehrlich; Mark McKenney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  mHealth and patient generated health data: stakeholder perspectives on opportunities and barriers for transforming healthcare.

Authors:  Danielle C Lavallee; Jenney R Lee; Elizabeth Austin; Richard Bloch; Sarah O Lawrence; Debbe McCall; Sean A Munson; Mara B Nery-Hurwit; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2020-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.