Janna D Stephens1, Allison M Yager, Jerilyn Allen. 1. Janna D. Stephens, PhD, RN Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Ohio State University, Columbus Allison M. Yager, BS BSN Student, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Jerilyn Allen, RN, ScD, FAAN Professor, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Using smartphone technology and text messaging for health is a growing field. This type of technology is well integrated into the lives of young adults. However, few studies have tested the effect of this type of technology to promote weight loss in young adults OBJECTIVE: : The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a behaviorally based smartphone application for weight loss combined with text messaging from a health coach on weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference in young adults as compared with a control condition. METHODS:Sixty-two young adults, aged 18 to 25 years, were randomized to receive (1) a smartphone application + health coach intervention and counseling sessions or (2) control condition with a counseling session. All outcome measures were tested at baseline and 3 months. These included weight, BMI, waist circumference, dietary habits, physical activity habits, and self-efficacy for healthy eating and physical activity. RESULTS:The sample was 71% female and 39% white, with an average age of 20 years and average BMI of 28.5 kg/m. Participants in the smartphone + health coach group lost significantly more weight (P = .026) and had a significant reduction in both BMI (P = .024) and waist circumference (P < .01) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this weight loss trial support the use of smartphone technology and feedback from a health coach on improving weight in a group of diverse young adults.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Using smartphone technology and text messaging for health is a growing field. This type of technology is well integrated into the lives of young adults. However, few studies have tested the effect of this type of technology to promote weight loss in young adults OBJECTIVE: : The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a behaviorally based smartphone application for weight loss combined with text messaging from a health coach on weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference in young adults as compared with a control condition. METHODS: Sixty-two young adults, aged 18 to 25 years, were randomized to receive (1) a smartphone application + health coach intervention and counseling sessions or (2) control condition with a counseling session. All outcome measures were tested at baseline and 3 months. These included weight, BMI, waist circumference, dietary habits, physical activity habits, and self-efficacy for healthy eating and physical activity. RESULTS: The sample was 71% female and 39% white, with an average age of 20 years and average BMI of 28.5 kg/m. Participants in the smartphone + health coach group lost significantly more weight (P = .026) and had a significant reduction in both BMI (P = .024) and waist circumference (P < .01) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this weight loss trial support the use of smartphone technology and feedback from a health coach on improving weight in a group of diverse young adults.
Authors: Sareen S Gropper; Anna Newton; Paul Harrington; Karla P Simmons; Lenda Jo Connell; Pamela Ulrich Journal: Prev Med Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Amy F Subar; Deirdre Douglass; Thea P Zimmerman; Frances E Thompson; Lisa L Kahle; Stephanie M George; Kevin W Dodd; Nancy Potischman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Melissa A Napolitano; Sharon Hayes; Gary G Bennett; Allison K Ives; Gary D Foster Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ann K Eno; Jessica M Ruck; Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Madeleine M Waldram; Alvin G Thomas; Tanjala S Purnell; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang; Allan B Massie; Fawaz Al Almmary; Lisa M Cooper; Dorry L Segev; Michael A Levan; Macey L Henderson Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Margaret Raber; Yue Liao; Anne Rara; Susan M Schembre; Kate J Krause; Larkin Strong; Carrie Daniel-MacDougall; Karen Basen-Engquist Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Valery L Feigin; Bo Norrving; Mary G George; Jennifer L Foltz; Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Kerstin Anne Kessel; Marco Me Vogel; Carmen Kessel; Henning Bier; Tilo Biedermann; Helmut Friess; Peter Herschbach; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Bernhard Meyer; Marion Kiechle; Ulrich Keller; Christian Peschel; Roland M Schmid; Stephanie E Combs Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 4.773