Kai Wang1, Xingfeng Shao1, Lirong Yan1,2, Samantha J Ma1,3, Jin Jin1,4, Danny J J Wang1,2. 1. Laboratory of FMRI Technology (LOFT), USC Mark & Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Siemens Healthcare Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To optimize and evaluate adiabatic pulses for pulsed arterial spin labeling at ultrahigh field 7 tesla. METHODS: Four common adiabatic inversion pulses, including hyperbolic secant, wideband uniform rate smooth truncation, frequency offset corrected inversion, and time-resampled frequency offset corrected inversion pulses, were optimized based on a custom-defined loss function that included labeling efficiency and inversion band uniformity. The optimized pulses were implemented in flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery sequences and tested on phantom and 11 healthy volunteers with 2 constraints: 1) specific absorption rate normalized; and 2) equal peak RF amplitude, respectively. A pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling sequence was implemented for comparison. Quantitative metrics such as perfusion and relative labeling efficiency versus residual tissue signal were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 4 pulses, the wideband uniform rate smooth truncation pulse yielded the lowest loss in simulation and achieved a good balance between labeling efficiency and residual tissue signal from both phantom and in vivo experiments. Wideband uniform rate smooth truncation-pulsed arterial spin labeling showed significantly higher relative labeling efficiency compared to the other sequences (P < .01), whereas the perfusion signal was increased by 40% when the highest B 1 + amplitude was used. The 4 pulsed arterial spin labeling sequences yielded comparable perfusion signals compared to pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling but with less than half the specific absorption rate. CONCLUSION: Optimized wideband uniform rate smooth truncation pulse with the highest B 1 + amplitude allowed was recommended for 7 tesla pulsed arterial spin labeling.
PURPOSE: To optimize and evaluate adiabatic pulses for pulsed arterial spin labeling at ultrahigh field 7 tesla. METHODS: Four common adiabatic inversion pulses, including hyperbolic secant, wideband uniform rate smooth truncation, frequency offset corrected inversion, and time-resampled frequency offset corrected inversion pulses, were optimized based on a custom-defined loss function that included labeling efficiency and inversion band uniformity. The optimized pulses were implemented in flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery sequences and tested on phantom and 11 healthy volunteers with 2 constraints: 1) specific absorption rate normalized; and 2) equal peak RF amplitude, respectively. A pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling sequence was implemented for comparison. Quantitative metrics such as perfusion and relative labeling efficiency versus residual tissue signal were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 4 pulses, the wideband uniform rate smooth truncation pulse yielded the lowest loss in simulation and achieved a good balance between labeling efficiency and residual tissue signal from both phantom and in vivo experiments. Wideband uniform rate smooth truncation-pulsed arterial spin labeling showed significantly higher relative labeling efficiency compared to the other sequences (P < .01), whereas the perfusion signal was increased by 40% when the highest B 1 + amplitude was used. The 4 pulsed arterial spin labeling sequences yielded comparable perfusion signals compared to pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling but with less than half the specific absorption rate. CONCLUSION: Optimized wideband uniform rate smooth truncation pulse with the highest B 1 + amplitude allowed was recommended for 7 tesla pulsed arterial spin labeling.
Authors: Yi Wang; Steen Moeller; Xiufeng Li; An T Vu; Kate Krasileva; Kamil Ugurbil; Essa Yacoub; Danny J J Wang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Aaron C Hurley; Ali Al-Radaideh; Li Bai; Uwe Aickelin; Ron Coxon; Paul Glover; Penny A Gowland Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kieran R O'Brien; Arthur W Magill; Jean Delacoste; Jose P Marques; Tobias Kober; Hans-Peter Fautz; Francois Lazeyras; Gunnar Krueger Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Edward J Auerbach; An T Vu; Steen Moeller; Christophe Lenglet; Sebastian Schmitter; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Verónica Aramendía-Vidaurreta; Divya S Bolar; Weiying Dai; Maria A Fernández-Seara; Jia Guo; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Henk Mutsaerts; Jan Petr; Qin Qin; Jonas Schollenberger; Yuriko Suzuki; Manuel Taso; David L Thomas; Matthias J P van Osch; Joseph Woods; Moss Y Zhao; Lirong Yan; Ze Wang; Li Zhao; Thomas W Okell Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 3.737