Literature DB >> 33426601

Comparison of universal screening in major lynch-associated tumors: a systematic review of literature.

George Kunnackal John1, Vipin Das Villgran2, Christine Caufield-Noll3, Francis M Giardiello4.   

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased lifetime risk of several cancers including colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC), ovarian (OC), urinary (UT) and sebaceous tumors (ST). The benefit for universal screening in CRC and EC is well known. However, this benefit in other major lynch-associated tumors is unclear. We performed a systematic review of all published articles in the MEDLINE database between 2005 to 2017 to identify studies performing universal screening for LS in unselected CRC, EC, OC, UT and ST. All cases with MSI-H (instability in two or more markers) or missing one or more proteins on IHC testing were considered screening positive. Cases with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation positive were considered to have somatic mutations. A total of 3788 articles were identified in MEDLINE yielding 129 study arms from 113 studies. The overall pooled yield of universal LS screening and germline mismatch gene mutation was significantly different across the major LS-associated tumors (Mann Whitney test, p < 0.001). The pooled screening yield was highest in ST [52.5% (355/676), 95% CI 48.74-56.26%] followed by EC [22.65% (1142/5041), 95% CI 21.54-23.86%], CRC [11.9% (5649/47,545), 95% CI 11.61-12.19%], OC [11.29% (320/2833), 95% CI 10.13-12.47%] and UT [11.2% (31/276), 95% CI 7.48-14.92%]. ST also had the highest pooled germline positivity for mismatch repair gene mutation [18.8%, 33/176, 95%CI 13.03-24.57], followed by EC [2.6% (97/3765), 95% CI 2.09-3.11], CRC [1.8% (682/37,220), 95% CI 1.66-1.94%], UT [1.8%(3/164), 95% CI - 0.24-3.83%] and OC [0.83%(25/2983), 95% CI 0.48-1.12%]. LS screening in EC yielded significantly higher somatic mutations compared to CRC [pooled percentage 16.94% [(538/3176), 95%CI 15.60-18.20%] vs. 5.23% [(1639/26,152), 95% CI 4.93-5.47%], Mann Whitney test, p < 0.0001. Universal LS testing should be routinely performed in OC, UT and STs in addition to CRC and EC. Our findings also support consideration for IHC and somatic mutation testing before germline testing in EC due to higher prevalence of somatic mutations as well as germline testing in all patients with ST. Our results have implications for future design of LS screening programs and further studies are needed to assess the cost effectiveness and burden on genetic counselling services with expanded universal testing for LS.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lynch syndrome; Universal screening

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33426601     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00226-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  71 in total

1.  Mismatch repair protein deficiency is common in sebaceous neoplasms and suggests the importance of screening for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Plocharczyk; Wendy L Frankel; Heather Hampel; Sara B Peters
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.533

2.  Accuracy of the routine detection of mutation in mismatch repair genes in patients with susceptibility to hereditary upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Florence Coulet; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Gaëlle Fromont; Olivier Cussenot
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Defective DNA mismatch repair activity is common in sebaceous neoplasms, and may be an ineffective approach to screen for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Anu R Lamba; Angela Y Moore; Todd Moore; Jennifer Rhees; Mildred A Arnold; C Richard Boland
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Hereditary Colorectal Polyposis and Cancer Syndromes: A Primer on Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Priyanka Kanth; Jade Grimmett; Marjan Champine; Randall Burt; N Jewel Samadder
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Routine testing for mismatch repair deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer is justified.

Authors:  Robyn Lynne Ward; Jenny Turner; Rachel Williams; Brita Pekarsky; Deborah Packham; Marija Velickovic; Alan Meagher; Terence O'Connor; Nicholas John Hawkins
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Correlation between germline mutations in MMR genes and microsatellite instability in ovarian cancer specimens.

Authors:  Mohammad R Akbari; Shiyu Zhang; Deborah Cragun; Ji-Hyun Lee; Domenico Coppola; John McLaughlin; Harvey A Risch; Barry Rosen; Patricia Shaw; Thomas A Sellers; Joellen Schildkraut; Steven A Narod; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel; Edward Martin; Mark Arnold; Karamjit Khanduja; Philip Kuebler; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Kaisa Sotamaa; Thomas W Prior; Judith Westman; Jenny Panescu; Dan Fix; Janet Lockman; Ilene Comeras; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-society Task Force on colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Francis M Giardiello; John I Allen; Jennifer E Axilbund; C Richard Boland; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; James M Church; Jason A Dominitz; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David A Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  The cancer family syndrome. Rare cutaneous phenotypic linkage of Torre's syndrome.

Authors:  H T Lynch; P M Lynch; J Pester; R M Fusaro
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1981-04

10.  Worldwide variation in lynch syndrome screening: case for universal screening in low colorectal cancer prevalence areas.

Authors:  George Kunnackal John; Vipin Das Villgran; Christine Caufield-Noll; Francis Giardiello
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in patients with Lynch Syndrome: Molecular diagnosis after immunohistochemistry of MMR proteins.

Authors:  Ursula Catena; Luigi Della Corte; Antonio Raffone; Antonio Travaglino; Emanuela Lucci Cordisco; Elena Teodorico; Valeria Masciullo; Giuseppe Bifulco; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Uptake of Genetic Testing Among Patients with Cancer At Risk for Lynch Syndrome in the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Ky'Era V Actkins; Swetha Srinivasan; Lisa P Spees; Erin Turbitt; Caitlin G Allen; Megan C Roberts
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-08-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.