INTRODUCTION: In medical practice, a mastery mindset is important for engaging in lifelong learning. The objective of this study was to examine the association between family medicine residents' scores on mindset measures and their performance on in-training examinations (ITE). METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of a cohort of family medicine residents. Following ethics approval, residents' ITE scores from each of the 2 years of residency were linked with residents' responses to a mindsets survey that they had taken at the midpoint of residency training. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between residents' mindset scores and their ITE scores. Of 85 residents, 46 (54%) had complete data for the three data collection points. RESULTS: Residents' ITE scores in year 1 were most predictive of their ITE scores in year 2 (β=0.72; P<.001). Mastery mindset scores were negatively associated with residents' performance on the ITE in year 2 (β=-0.29; P=.004). CONCLUSION: While the observed negative relationship between residents' mastery mindset scores and their ITE performance may be disconcerting, it is not surprising. In clinical settings, residents are individually coached by preceptors and provided with specific, actionable feedback to support their learning. With respect to formative assessments, residents likely require explicit training on how to use their assessment results (ITE scores) to support their self-directed learning. This finding has practical implications for residency programs in using ITEs as formative assessments.
INTRODUCTION: In medical practice, a mastery mindset is important for engaging in lifelong learning. The objective of this study was to examine the association between family medicine residents' scores on mindset measures and their performance on in-training examinations (ITE). METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of a cohort of family medicine residents. Following ethics approval, residents' ITE scores from each of the 2 years of residency were linked with residents' responses to a mindsets survey that they had taken at the midpoint of residency training. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between residents' mindset scores and their ITE scores. Of 85 residents, 46 (54%) had complete data for the three data collection points. RESULTS: Residents' ITE scores in year 1 were most predictive of their ITE scores in year 2 (β=0.72; P<.001). Mastery mindset scores were negatively associated with residents' performance on the ITE in year 2 (β=-0.29; P=.004). CONCLUSION: While the observed negative relationship between residents' mastery mindset scores and their ITE performance may be disconcerting, it is not surprising. In clinical settings, residents are individually coached by preceptors and provided with specific, actionable feedback to support their learning. With respect to formative assessments, residents likely require explicit training on how to use their assessment results (ITE scores) to support their self-directed learning. This finding has practical implications for residency programs in using ITEs as formative assessments.
Authors: Jason R Frank; Linda S Snell; Olle Ten Cate; Eric S Holmboe; Carol Carraccio; Susan R Swing; Peter Harris; Nicholas J Glasgow; Craig Campbell; Deepak Dath; Ronald M Harden; William Iobst; Donlin M Long; Rani Mungroo; Denyse L Richardson; Jonathan Sherbino; Ivan Silver; Sarah Taber; Martin Talbot; Kenneth A Harris Journal: Med Teach Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Shelley Ross; Cheryl N Poth; Michel Donoff; Paul Humphries; Ivan Steiner; Shirley Schipper; Fred Janke; Darren Nichols Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Thomas R O'Neill; Zijia Li; Michael R Peabody; Melanie Lybarger; Kenneth Royal; James C Puffer Journal: Fam Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Shelley Ross; Natalia M Binczyk; Deena M Hamza; Shirley Schipper; Paul Humphries; Darren Nichols; Michel G Donoff Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-11-02