| Literature DB >> 33426216 |
Kozue Yoshida1, Fumiyasu Ono2, Takehiro Chouno1, Bual Ronald Perocho1,3, Yasuhiro Ikegami1, Nana Shirakigawa1, Hiroyuki Ijima1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cells have various applications in biomedical research. Cryopreservation is a cell-preservation technique that provides cells for such applications. After cryopreservation, sensitive cells, such as primary hepatocytes, suffer from low viability due to the physical damage caused by ice crystals, highlighting the need for better methods of cryopreservation to improve cell viability. Given the importance of effectively suppressing ice crystal formation to protect cellular structure, trehalose has attracted attention as cryoprotectant based on its ability to inhibit ice crystal formation; however, trehalose induces osmotic stress. Therefore, to establish a cell-cryopreservation technique, it is necessary to provide an optimal balance between the protective and damaging effects of trehalose.Entities:
Keywords: CCK-8, Cell Counting Kit-8; CMIC, cell-membrane-impermeable cryoprotective agent; DMEM, dulbecco's modified Eagle medium; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; FBS, fetal bovine serum; Hepatocytes cryopreservation; Ice crystal; Liver function; Osmotic stress; Very low concentration of trehalose
Year: 2020 PMID: 33426216 PMCID: PMC7770350 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2020.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Fig. 1Osmotic effect of trehalose on hepatocytes. (A) The sphere-equivalent volume and (B) intracellular dehydrogenase activity of hepatocytes after being exposed to various concentrations of trehalose (0, 26 μM, 26 mM, 260 mM, 520 mM, 1 M). Bars represent the S.D (n = 3). ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05 vs. 0 M trehalose.
Fig. 2Cryopreservation effect of trehalose on hepatocytes. (A) Observation of ice crystal morphology of DHDM supplemented with trehalose (0, 26 μM, 26 mM) and DMSO (0, 10%). Arrows represent a linear orientation, and arrow heads represent branching of ice crystal formation. Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Determination of viable cell number after cryopreservation. 0, 26 μM, 26 mM, 260 mM trehalose and 10% DMSO to DHDM were used as cryopreservation solutions. Bars represent the S.D (n = 3). ∗p < 0.05 vs. 0 M trehalose.
Fig. 3The function of hepatocytes cultivated after cryopreservation. DHDM containing 2.6 μM trehalose (Treh) and 10% DMSO were used as cryopreservation solution. The seeding viable cell density was as follows, freshly isolated hepatocytes (non cryopreserved): 2.5 × 104 cells/cm2, hepatocytes cryopreserved using only 10% DMSO (DMSO): 4.4 × 104 cells/cm2, hepatocytes cryopreserved using 10% DMSO and 2.6 μM trehalose (Treh/DMSO): 5.0 × 104 cells/cm2. (A) Morphology of hepatocytes at 1-days post-inoculation (A-1: non cryopreserved, A-2: DMSO, A-3: Treh/DMSO). Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Assessment of intracellular dehydrogenase activity at 1-, 3-, and 5-days post-inoculation. (C) albumin-secretion rate, (D) albumin-secretion rate according to intracellular dehydrogenase activity at 2–3 and 4–5 days post-inoculation, (E) EROD activity according to intracellular dehydrogenase activity at 3-days post-inoculation. (F) ammonia metabolic rate and (G) ammonia metabolic rate according to intracellular dehydrogenase activity at 1 day post-inoculation. Bars represent the S.D (n = 3, ∗p < 0.05 vs. 0 M trehalose).
Fig. 4Conceptual diagram of the relationship between trehalose concentration and viable cell number of hepatocyte after cryopreservation.