Literature DB >> 33426057

Biomechanical Consequences of Nail Insertion Point and Anterior Cortical Perforation for Antegrade Femoral Nailing.

Michael Ching1, Aaron Gee2, Christopher Del Balso1,2, Abdel Lawendy1,2, Emil H Schemitsch1,2, Radovan Zdero1,2,3, David Sanders1,2.   

Abstract

This biomechanical study assessed the influence of changing antegrade cephalomedullary nail insertion point from anterior to neutral to posterior locations relative to the tip of the greater trochanter with or without anterior cortical perforation in the distal femur. Artificial osteoporotic femurs and cephalomedullary nails were used to create 5 test groups each with 8 specimens: intact femur without a nail or perforation, anterior nail insertion point without perforation, neutral nail insertion point without perforation, posterior nail insertion point without perforation, and posterior nail insertion point with perforation. Nondestructive biomechanical tests were done at 250 N in axial, coronal 3-point bending, sagittal 3-point bending, and torsional loading in order to measure overall stiffness and bone stress. The intact femur group vs. all femur/nail groups had lower stiffness in all loading modes (p ≤ 0.018), as well as higher bone stress in the proximal femur (p ≤ 0.027) but not in the distal femur above the perforation (p = 0.096). Compared to each other, femur/nail groups only showed differences in sagittal 3-point bending stiffness for anterior and neutral vs. posterior nail insertion points without (p ≤ 0.025) and with perforation (p ≤ 0.047). Although it did not achieve statistical significance (p ≥ 0.096), moving the nail insertion point from anterior to neutral to posterior to posterior with perforation did gradually increase bone stress by 45% (proximal femur) and 46% (distal femur). No femur or hardware failures occurred. Moving the nail insertion point and the presence of a perforation had little effect on stiffness, but the increased bone stress may be important as a predictor of fracture. Based on current bone stress results, surgeons should use anterior or neutral nail insertion points to reduce the risk of anterior cortical perforation.
Copyright © 2020 Michael Ching et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33426057      PMCID: PMC7772046          DOI: 10.1155/2020/5878607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  40 in total

1.  Cephalomedullary nails: factors associated with impingement of the anterior cortex of the femur in a Hispanic population.

Authors:  Omar R Peña; Amparo Gómez Gélvez; Kristian A Espinosa; José R Cardona
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Prevention of cortical breach during placement of an antegrade intramedullary femoral nail.

Authors:  John A Scolaro; Christina Endress; Samir Mehta
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Biomechanical analysis of the cephalomedullary nail versus the trochanteric stabilizing plate for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  David Walmsley; Bruce Nicayenzi; Paul Rt Kuzyk; Alan Machin; Habiba Bougherara; Emil H Schemitsch; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  The use of the long gamma nail in proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  K Sehat; R P Baker; G Pattison; R Price; W J Harries; T J S Chesser
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  A cadaveric biomechanical study comparing the ease of femoral nail insertion: 1.0- vs 1.5-m bow designs.

Authors:  Huan Yuan; Yves Acklin; Peter Varga; Boyko Gueorguiev; Markus Windolf; Devakar Epari; Michael Schuetz; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Breakage of cephalomedullary nailing in operative treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Christian von Rüden; Sven Hungerer; Peter Augat; Oliver Trapp; Volker Bühren; Christian Hierholzer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Bone graft harvest using a new intramedullary system.

Authors:  Mohan V Belthur; Janet D Conway; Gaurav Jindal; Ashish Ranade; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains.

Authors:  Berend Linke; Chloe Ansari Moein; Oliver Bösl; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Chris van der Werken; Karsten Schwieger; Keito Ito
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Hip Fracture Types in Canadian Men and Women Change Differently with Age: A Population-Level Analysis.

Authors:  Richard G Crilly; Marita Kloseck; Selam Mequanint
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-03

10.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Curvature of the Femoral Canal in 426 Chinese Femurs.

Authors:  Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Jing-Xin Zhao; Li-Cheng Zhang; An-Hua Long; Li-Hai Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.