Literature DB >> 25466724

Breakage of cephalomedullary nailing in operative treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Christian von Rüden1, Sven Hungerer2, Peter Augat3, Oliver Trapp2,3, Volker Bühren2, Christian Hierholzer2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical breakage of cephalomedullary nail osteosynthesis is a rare complication attributed to delayed fracture union or nonunion. This study presents a series of cases of breakage and secondary lag screw dislocation after cephalomedullary nailing. The aim of this study was to identify factors that contribute to cephalomedullary nail breakage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective case series review between 02/2005 and 12/2013, we analyzed 453 patients with trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture who had been treated by cephalomedullary nailing. Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. 13 patients with cephalomedullary nail breakage were included (failure rate 2.9 %).
RESULTS: Seven patients were women, and six men with a mean age of 72 years (range 35-94). Implant breakage occurred 6 months postoperatively (range 1-19 months). In ten cases, breakage was secondary to delayed or nonunion, which was thought to be mainly due to insufficient reduction of the fracture, and in two cases due to loss of the lag screw because of missing set screw. In one case, breakage was apparent during elective metal removal following complete fracture healing. Short-term outcome was evaluated 6 months after operative revision using Harris hip score in 11 out of 13 patients showing a mean score of 84 %. Complete radiological fracture healing has been found in 11 patients available for follow-up within 6 months after revision surgery. DISCUSSION: Breakage of cephalomedullary nail osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures is a severe complication. The results of our study demonstrate that revision surgery provides good clinical and radiological short-term results. Predominately, failures of trochanteric fractures are related to lack of surgeon performance. Therefore, application of the implant requires accurate preoperative planning, advanced surgical experience to evaluate the patient and the fracture classification, and precise surgical technique including attention to detail and anatomical reduction of the fracture fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25466724     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-2121-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  G H Sandmann; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

3.  [Evolution and principles of intramedullary locked nailing].

Authors:  C Hierholzer; J Friederichs; P Augat; A Woltmann; O Trapp; V Bühren; C von Rüden
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of elderly unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Qi-Chun Song; Sha-Jie Dang; Yan Zhao; Ling Wei; Da-Peng Duan; Wen-Bo Wei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Case report: unique failure of a Synthes TFNA fenestrated lag screw in a peritrochanteric nonunion.

Authors:  Kevin P Smidt; Kevin J Perry; Lincoln K Andre; Brad J Chauvin; Steve Kautz; Patrick A Massey; R Shane Barton
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-03-18

6.  Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Bernhard Wolf; Dietmar Dammerer; Martin Thaler; Peter Schwendinger; Richard A Lindtner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Is Full-Length Intramedullary Nail Necessary for Atypical Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture Associated with Bisphosphonate?

Authors:  Kwang-Kyoun Kim; Seung Kwon Ryu; Seok-Won Lee; Hyun-Jae Cha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2020-05-31

8.  Is open bone graft always necessary when treating aseptic subtrochanteric nonunion with a reamed intramedullary nail?

Authors:  Won Chul Shin; Jae Hoon Jang; Nam Hoon Moon; Se Bin Jun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Femoral trochanteric fracture: PFNA spiral blade placement with the aid of an angler.

Authors:  Ye Yu; Keliang Pan; Gangxiang Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Load distribution between cephalic screws in a dual lag screw trochanteric nail.

Authors:  Julia Henschel; Sebastian Eberle; Peter Augat
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.