Jiangping Yang1, Jiaqi Han1, Jinlan He1, Baofeng Duan1, Qiheng Gou1, Ping Ai1, Lei Liu1, Yanchu Li1, Kexing Ren1, Feng Wang1, Min Yao2, Nianyong Chen1. 1. Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Addition of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) or docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) significantly improved survival in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, an economic evaluation of these regimens remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of GP versus TPF regimen in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive Markov model was developed to evaluate the health and economic outcomes of GP versus TPF regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Baseline and clinical outcome were derived from 158 patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IVA NPC between 2010 and 2015. We evaluated the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. One-way sensitive analysis explored the impact of uncertainty in key model parameters on results, and probabilistic uncertainty was assessed through a Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: GP regimen provided an additional 0.42 QALYs with incremental cost of $3,821.99, resulting in an ICER of $9,099.98 per QALY versus TPF regimen at the real-world setting. One-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were most sensitive to the cost and proportion of receiving subsequent treatment in two groups. The probability that GP regimen being cost-effective compared with TPF regimen was 86.9% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $31,008.16 per QALY. CONCLUSION: Using real-world data, GP regimen was demonstrated a cost-effective alternative to TFP regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC in China. It provides valuable evidence for clinicians when making treatment decisions to improve the cost-effectiveness of treatment.
BACKGROUND: Addition of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) or docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) significantly improved survival in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, an economic evaluation of these regimens remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of GP versus TPF regimen in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive Markov model was developed to evaluate the health and economic outcomes of GP versus TPF regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Baseline and clinical outcome were derived from 158 patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IVA NPC between 2010 and 2015. We evaluated the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. One-way sensitive analysis explored the impact of uncertainty in key model parameters on results, and probabilistic uncertainty was assessed through a Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: GP regimen provided an additional 0.42 QALYs with incremental cost of $3,821.99, resulting in an ICER of $9,099.98 per QALY versus TPF regimen at the real-world setting. One-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were most sensitive to the cost and proportion of receiving subsequent treatment in two groups. The probability that GP regimen being cost-effective compared with TPF regimen was 86.9% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $31,008.16 per QALY. CONCLUSION: Using real-world data, GP regimen was demonstrated a cost-effective alternative to TFP regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC in China. It provides valuable evidence for clinicians when making treatment decisions to improve the cost-effectiveness of treatment.
Authors: Richard Sullivan; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Karol Sikora; John Zalcberg; Neal J Meropol; Eitan Amir; David Khayat; Peter Boyle; Philippe Autier; Ian F Tannock; Tito Fojo; Jim Siderov; Steve Williamson; Silvia Camporesi; J Gordon McVie; Arnie D Purushotham; Peter Naredi; Alexander Eggermont; Murray F Brennan; Michael L Steinberg; Mark De Ridder; Susan A McCloskey; Dirk Verellen; Terence Roberts; Guy Storme; Rodney J Hicks; Peter J Ell; Bradford R Hirsch; David P Carbone; Kevin A Schulman; Paul Catchpole; David Taylor; Jan Geissler; Nancy G Brinker; David Meltzer; David Kerr; Matti Aapro Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Brigette B Y Ma; Wan-Teck Lim; Boon-Cher Goh; Edwin P Hui; Kwok-Wai Lo; Adam Pettinger; Nathan R Foster; Jonathan W Riess; Mark Agulnik; Alex Y C Chang; Akhil Chopra; Julie A Kish; Christine H Chung; Douglas R Adkins; Kevin J Cullen; Barbara J Gitlitz; Dean W Lim; Ka-Fai To; K C Allen Chan; Y M Dennis Lo; Ann D King; Charles Erlichman; Jun Yin; Brian A Costello; Anthony T C Chan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 50.717