| Literature DB >> 33425251 |
Mackenzie E Malo1, Zachary Schultzhaus2, Connor Frank1, Jillian Romsdahl3, Zheng Wang2, Ekaterina Dadachova1.
Abstract
Melanized fungi have been isolated from some of the harshest radioactive environments, and their ability to thrive in these locations is in part due to the pigment melanin. Melanin imparts a selective advantage to fungi by providing a physical shield, a chemical shield, and possibly a signaling mechanism. In previous work we demonstrated that protracted exposure of the melanized yeast Exophiala dermatitidis to mixed alpha-, beta-, and gamma-emitting radiation resulted in an adapted strain able to mount a unique response to ionizing radiation in the environment in a melanin-dependent fashion. By exploring the genome and transcriptome of this adapted melanized strain relative to a non-irradiated control we determined the altered response was transcriptomic in nature, as whole genome sequencing revealed limited variation. Transcriptomic analysis indicated that of the adapted isolates analyzed, two lineages existed: one like the naïve, non-adapted strain, and one with a unique transcriptomic signature that exhibited downregulation of metabolic processes, and upregulation of translation-associated genes. Analysis of differential gene expression in the adapted strain showed an overlap in response between the control conditions and reactive oxygen species conditions, whereas exposure to an alpha particle source resulted in a robust downregulation of metabolic processes and upregulation of DNA replication and repair genes, and RNA metabolic processes. This suggest previous exposure to radiation primes the fungus to respond to subsequent exposures in a unique way. By exploring this unique response, we have expanded our knowledge of how melanized fungi interact with and respond to ionizing radiation in their environment.Entities:
Keywords: Fungi; Ionizing radiation; Melanin; Radioadaptation; Transcriptome
Year: 2020 PMID: 33425251 PMCID: PMC7772362 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J ISSN: 2001-0370 Impact factor: 7.271
Fig. 1Polonium-210 Exposure. Wildtype naïve (WTN) and wildtype 225Ac adapted (WTA) Exophiala dermatitidis colonies growth adjacent to 210Po source. Representative colonies shown with a 1 mm scale bar.
Strains used in this study.
| Original Strain | Adaptation conditions | Total Dose (over 5 weeks/35d) | Isolate ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATCC34100, | Wildtype Naïve (WTN) | Background | 1, 2 |
| ATCC34100, | Wildtype 225Ac Adapted (WTA) | 183 Gy | 3–6 |
| Albino Naïve ( | Background | 7, 8 | |
| Albino 225Ac Adapted ( | 183 Gy | 9, 12 |
RNA Samples collected for Transcriptomic Analysis.
| Condition | WT Melanized Strain Analyzed | Isolate ID |
|---|---|---|
| Background Radiation | WT Naïve Control (WTN-C) | 1 |
| 2 | ||
| WT Adapted Control (WTA-C) | 3 | |
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| Ionizing Radiation Exposure (210Po) | WT Naïve Radiation (WTN-R) | 1 |
| 2 | ||
| WT Adapted Radiation (WTA-R) | 3 | |
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| Reactice Oxygen Species Exposure (H2O2) | WT Naïve Oxidation (WTN-O) | 1 |
| 2 | ||
| WT Adapted Oxidation (WTA-O) | 3 | |
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 |
Summary of genetic mutations identified in WTA and pksA radioadapted strains relative to their respective naïve strain.
| Strain ID | WTA3 | WTA5 | WTA6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of SNPs | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 21 |
| Intergenic | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
| Missense | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| UTR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| No. of INDELs | 9 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| Intergenic | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Frameshift | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| UTR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Disruptive inframe | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Conservative inframe | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 33 |
Genetic variants identified in WTA radioadapted strains relative to the WT naïve strain. The table describes the chromosome and nucleotide position of the variant, as well as the mutation type, which was predicted using snpEff. For intergenic variants, the gene name and annotation refer to the gene that is closest to that mutation.
| CHROM | POSITION | MUTATION TYPE | GENE/NEAREST GENE | ANNOTATION | OCCURRENCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 433,055 | Disruptive infame deletion | HMPREF1120_00159 | Kinesin family member | WTA6 |
| 1 | 2,836,819 | Missense | HMPREF1120_01028 | ATP-dependent RNA helicase | WTA5 |
| 2 | 631,490 | Frameshift | HMPREF1120_01736 | Stress-response nuclear envelope | WTA3 |
| 2 | 2,528,760 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_02387 | UDP-glucose 4-epimerase | WTA3 |
| 3 | 1,006,101 | Frameshift | HMPREF1120_03360 | Alpha/beta-hydrolase | WTA3 |
| 3 | 1,268,882 | 3′ UTR variant | HMPREF1120_03462 | Phosphatidylinositol glycan | WTA3 |
| 3 | 1,576,609 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_03561 | Alanine transaminase | WTA6 |
| 3 | 3,187,642 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_04157 | MFS transporter | WTA3, WTA5, WTA6 |
| 4 | 1,158,832 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_04747 | Carbonic anhydrase | WTA5 |
| 5 | 2,628,494 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_06504 | SSS family solute:Na + symporter | WTA3, WTA6 |
| 6 | 1,418,001 | Conservative inframe insertion | HMPREF1120_07349 | Flagellar motor protein MotB domain | WTA3 |
| 6 | 1,971,753 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_07545 | Redox-sensitive bicupin; pirin superfamily | WTA3, WTA5 |
| 7 | 1,180,436 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_08242 | Hypothetical protein | WTA3 |
Genetic variants identified in pksA radioadapted strains relative to the pks naïve strain. The table describes the chromosome and nucleotide position of the variant, as well as the mutation type, which was predicted using snpEff. For intergenic variants, the gene name and annotation refer to the gene that is closest to that mutation.
| CHROM | POSITION | MUTATION TYPE | GENE/NEAREST GENE | ANNOTATION | OCCURRENCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,426,160 | Frameshift | HMPREF1120_00517 | DnaJ-domain (heat shock protein) | |
| 1 | 3,069,904 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_01094 | DNA Pol 3 subunit | |
| 3 | 843,500 | 5′ UTR variant | HMPREF1120_03304 | Endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase | |
| 3 | 2,568,652 | 3′ UTR variant | HMPREF1120_03921 | Hypothetical protein | |
| 3 | 3,187,642 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_04157 | MFS transporter | |
| 3 | 3,617,951 | Frameshift | HMPREF1120_04304 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 | |
| 4 | 1,631,962 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_04917 | Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase | |
| 4 | 1,631,965 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_04917 | Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase | |
| 4 | 1631762–1632254 | 17 Intergenic variants | HMPREF1120_04917 | Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase | |
| 5 | 998,035 | Conservative inframe deletion | HMPREF1120_05954 | Transducin (beta)-like 1 | |
| 5 | 3,033,533 | Frameshift | HMPREF1120_06649 | Arginase | |
| 6 | 48,768 | Frameshift | HMPREF1120_06854 | Phytanoyl-CoA hydroxylase | |
| 6 | 1,198,245 | Missense | HMPREF1120_07268 | Alcohol dehydrogenase (NADP+) | |
| 6 | 1,666,136 | Disruptive inframe deletion | HMPREF1120_07440 | MFS transporter, SP family, sugar:H + symporter | |
| 6 | 1,971,753 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_07545 | Redox-sensitive bicupin; pirin superfamily | |
| 6 | 1,971,778 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_07545 | Redox-sensitive bicupin; pirin superfamily | |
| 6 | 2,002,737 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_07554 | Hypothetical protein | |
| 6 | 2,252,182 | Frameshift | HMPREF1120_07636 | NRPS SidC (siderophore biosynthesis) | |
| 7 | 70,963 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_07867 | Multi-sensor signal transduction histidine kinase | |
| 7 | 1,099,400 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_08213 | Transcription factor | |
| 7 | 1,142,537 | Missense | HMPREF1120_08228 | Hypothetical protein | |
| 7 | 1,503,364 | Intergenic | HMPREF1120_08366 | Autophagy-related protein |
Fig. 2Comparison of control RNAseq samples using Transcripts Per Million (TPM) values observed for each predicted transcript encoded by the E. dermatitidis genome. Samples 1 and 2 represent naïve strains, while samples 3–6 represent adapted strains.
Fig. 3Comparison of the responses of naïve (Strain 1) and adapted (Strain 4) to H2O2 (O) and Polonium-210 (R) exposure, visualized with RNAseq data using Transcripts Per Million (TPM) values observed for each predicted transcript encoded by the E. dermatitidis genome.
Fig. 4RNA-seq results demonstrated as the total number of differentially expressed (DE) genes (FDR < 0.05) between pairwise comparisons of samples and conditions in this experiment. Strains include wildtype (WT) and adapted (A). Conditions include background (C), H2O2 (O), or ionizing radiation (R).
Fig. 5Venn diagram demonstrating the number of differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05) that are either upregulated (left) or downregulated (right) in the adapted strains relative to the wild type strains when exposed to background (C), H2O2 (O), or ionizing radiation (R). Gene Ontology – Biological Processes as provided by Fungifun (see Methods). Percentages indicate fraction of total differentially expressed genes.
Gene Ontology categories (Biological process) that were determined to be significantly enriched (FDR < 0.01) among the genes that were differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05) between naïve and adapted strains under each condition, as determined using FungiFun.
| GO term classification (Biological Process) | Adjusted p-value | # genes/category | # genes/input | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| oxidation–reduction process | 4.60e-18 | 165/832 | 165/811 | |
| metabolic process | 1.76e-09 | 183/1175 | 183/811 | |
| transmembrane transport | 1.14e-04 | 77/459 | 77/811 | |
| translation | 1.26e-20 | 62/150 | 62/834 | |
| glycolytic process | 3.27e-04 | 10/18 | 10/834 | |
| cellular amino acid biosynthetic process | 6.18e-04 | 12/27 | 12/834 | |
| oxidation–reduction process | 7.66e-11 | 119/832 | 119/613 | |
| transmembrane transport | 2.74e-04 | 61/459 | 61/613 | |
| microtubule-based movement | 3.87e-03 | 6/13 | 6/613 | |
| catechol-containing compound metabolic process | 7.09e-03 | 3/3 | 3/613 | |
| translation | 5.83e-36 | 76/150 | 76/795 | |
| ATP synthesis coupled proton transport | 1.13e-03 | 8/14 | 8/795 | |
| glycolytic process | 1.18e-03 | 9/18 | 9/795 | |
| Oxidation-reduction process | 1.88e-20 | 179/832 | 179/860 | |
| metabolic process | 2.35e-08 | 189/1175 | 189/860 | |
| DNA replication initiation | 2.39e-03 | 6/8 | 6/853 | |
| DNA replication | 5.30e-03 | 14/44 | 14/853 | |
| formation of translation preinitiation complex | 5.30e-03 | 7/13 | 7/853 | |
| regulation of translational initiation | 5.30e-03 | 7/13 | 7/853 | |
| ribosome biogenesis | 9.27e-03 | 10/27 | 10/853 |