| Literature DB >> 33424186 |
S K S Marya1, Chandeep Singh1.
Abstract
With an ever-increasing number of revisions, the surgeons will be faced with the dilemma of choosing the right implant for the revision knee. The soft tissue viability governs the choice of an implant at the time of revision. The selection ranges from the cruciate-retaining to the rotating/fixed hinge implants. The surgeon needs to plan preoperatively, but usually, the final decisions are made intraoperative. As determining the amount of constraint necessary can be challenging, we have tried to lay down a few pointers, which would help to make that choice. The posterior stabilized implants can manage most revision knees; in certain situations where they cannot accommodate the flexion-extension gap imbalance, a varus-valgus constrained implant should be used. The rotating hinge implants are used for severe instabilities or loss of soft tissue or bone around the knee. The use of a higher constraint implant has its consequences like reduced life span and reduced function. Thus it is crucial to use the least amount of constraint as necessary - however, as much as required.Entities:
Keywords: Constraint; Revision knee; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Rotating hinge; Stems; Varus valgus constrained
Year: 2020 PMID: 33424186 PMCID: PMC7779836 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop ISSN: 0972-978X