Pauline Klein1, Alicia Kate Fairweather2, Sharon Lawn2, Helen Margaret Stallman3, Paul Cammell4. 1. Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Pauline.Klein@flinders.edu.au. 2. Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. 3. Thompson Insititute, University of the Sunshine Coast, 12 Innovation Pkwy, Birtinya, Queensland, 4575, Australia. 4. The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Structural stigma in health systems experienced by consumers diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a widespread phenomenon that causes major health inequities and harm for this population. Structural stigma in this context relates to institutional policies, cultural norms, and organizational practices that limit consumers' access to health services, quality of care, and capacity to achieve optimal health and well-being. BPD is a serious mental illness with high morbidity and mortality, characterized by instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and emotional and behavioral deregulation, which stem from significant traumatic childhood/life events, and/or biological etiologies. The objectives of this scoping review are to explore the international literature on structural stigma in healthcare systems specific to BPD, and to provide an overview of the impact of structural stigma on health services for BPD consumers and their carers/families. METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review guidelines. We will search the following electronic databases (from inception onwards): MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and JBI-Evidence databases. Grey literature will be identified through the Google search engine. We will include all types of literature in English, published and unpublished, including any study design, reviews, clinical practice guidelines, policy reports, and other documents. No restrictions on publication date of sources of evidence will be applied. International literature should examine structural stigma associated with BPD in any healthcare setting such as, outpatients, inpatients, primary health care, or community-based facilities. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles, abstracts, and full-text citations. Quality appraisal of the included sources of evidence will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018 version. Data analysis will involve quantitative (e.g., frequencies) and qualitative (e.g., thematic analysis) methods. DISCUSSION: This review is anticipated to enhance both identification and understanding of those structures in health systems (i.e., institutional policies, cultural norms, and practices) that manifest and perpetuate stigma experienced by consumers with BPD and their carers/families. The findings can be used to inform future research, policy, and practice relating to stigma reduction strategies that can be adopted to improve the provision of BPD-responsive services and care for this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/bhpg4 ).
BACKGROUND: Structural stigma in health systems experienced by consumers diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a widespread phenomenon that causes major health inequities and harm for this population. Structural stigma in this context relates to institutional policies, cultural norms, and organizational practices that limit consumers' access to health services, quality of care, and capacity to achieve optimal health and well-being. BPD is a serious mental illness with high morbidity and mortality, characterized by instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and emotional and behavioral deregulation, which stem from significant traumatic childhood/life events, and/or biological etiologies. The objectives of this scoping review are to explore the international literature on structural stigma in healthcare systems specific to BPD, and to provide an overview of the impact of structural stigma on health services for BPD consumers and their carers/families. METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review guidelines. We will search the following electronic databases (from inception onwards): MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and JBI-Evidence databases. Grey literature will be identified through the Google search engine. We will include all types of literature in English, published and unpublished, including any study design, reviews, clinical practice guidelines, policy reports, and other documents. No restrictions on publication date of sources of evidence will be applied. International literature should examine structural stigma associated with BPD in any healthcare setting such as, outpatients, inpatients, primary health care, or community-based facilities. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles, abstracts, and full-text citations. Quality appraisal of the included sources of evidence will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018 version. Data analysis will involve quantitative (e.g., frequencies) and qualitative (e.g., thematic analysis) methods. DISCUSSION: This review is anticipated to enhance both identification and understanding of those structures in health systems (i.e., institutional policies, cultural norms, and practices) that manifest and perpetuate stigma experienced by consumers with BPD and their carers/families. The findings can be used to inform future research, policy, and practice relating to stigma reduction strategies that can be adopted to improve the provision of BPD-responsive services and care for this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/bhpg4 ).
Authors: Bridget F Grant; S Patricia Chou; Risë B Goldstein; Boji Huang; Frederick S Stinson; Tulshi D Saha; Sharon M Smith; Deborah A Dawson; Attila J Pulay; Roger P Pickering; W June Ruan Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Andrea C Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly K O'Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; David Moher; Micah D J Peters; Tanya Horsley; Laura Weeks; Susanne Hempel; Elie A Akl; Christine Chang; Jessie McGowan; Lesley Stewart; Lisa Hartling; Adrian Aldcroft; Michael G Wilson; Chantelle Garritty; Simon Lewin; Christina M Godfrey; Marilyn T Macdonald; Etienne V Langlois; Karla Soares-Weiser; Jo Moriarty; Tammy Clifford; Özge Tunçalp; Sharon E Straus Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Larissa Shamseer; David Moher; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-01-02
Authors: Laura Nyblade; Melissa A Stockton; Kayla Giger; Virginia Bond; Maria L Ekstrand; Roger Mc Lean; Ellen M H Mitchell; La Ron E Nelson; Jaime C Sapag; Taweesap Siraprapasiri; Janet Turan; Edwin Wouters Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Kylee Trevillion; Ruth Stuart; Josephine Ocloo; Eva Broeckelmann; Stephen Jeffreys; Tamar Jeynes; Dawn Allen; Jessica Russell; Jo Billings; Mike J Crawford; Oliver Dale; Rex Haigh; Paul Moran; Shirley McNicholas; Vicky Nicholls; Una Foye; Alan Simpson; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans; Sonia Johnson; Sian Oram Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 3.630