Literature DB >> 33423631

Reduced risk-seeking in chimpanzees in a zero-outcome game.

Stefanie Keupp1,2, Sebastian Grueneisen3,4, Elliot A Ludvig1, Felix Warneken3, Alicia P Melis2.   

Abstract

A key component of economic decisions is the integration of information about reward outcomes and probabilities in selecting between competing options. In many species, risky choice is influenced by the magnitude of available outcomes, probability of success and the possibility of extreme outcomes. Chimpanzees are generally regarded to be risk-seeking. In this study, we examined two aspects of chimpanzees' risk preferences: first, whether setting the value of the non-preferred outcome of a risky option to zero changes chimpanzees' risk preferences, and second, whether individual risk preferences are stable across two different measures. Across two experiments, we found chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes, n = 23) as a group to be risk-neutral to risk-avoidant with highly stable individual risk preferences. We discuss how the possibility of going empty-handed might reduce chimpanzees' risk-seeking relative to previous studies. This malleability in risk preferences as a function of experimental parameters and individual differences raises interesting questions about whether it is appropriate or helpful to categorize a species as a whole as risk-seeking or risk-avoidant. This article is part of the theme issue 'Existence and prevalence of economic behaviours among non-human primates'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chimpanzees; individual differences; risk; zero outcome

Year:  2021        PMID: 33423631      PMCID: PMC7815432          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  33 in total

1.  Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1986-04

Review 2.  Comparative inspiration: From puzzles with pigeons to novel discoveries with humans in risky choice.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Elliot A Ludvig; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Do tufted capuchin monkeys play the odds? Flexible risk preferences in Sapajus spp.

Authors:  Francesca De Petrillo; Marialba Ventricelli; Giorgia Ponsi; Elsa Addessi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Intuitive statistical inferences in chimpanzees and humans follow Weber's law.

Authors:  Johanna Eckert; Josep Call; Jonas Hermes; Esther Herrmann; Hannes Rakoczy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-07-14

6.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) tolerate some degree of inequity while cooperating but refuse to donate effort for nothing.

Authors:  Matthew W Campbell; Julia Watzek; Malini Suchak; Sarah M Berman; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.371

7.  Of black swans and tossed coins: is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events?

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Great apes' risk-taking strategies in a decision making task.

Authors:  Daniel B M Haun; Christian Nawroth; Josep Call
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit emotional responses to decision outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Brian Hare
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) share the spoils with collaborators and bystanders.

Authors:  Maria John; Shona Duguid; Michael Tomasello; Alicia P Melis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Economic behaviours among non-human primates.

Authors:  Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde; Elsa Addessi; Thomas Boraud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.