Literature DB >> 33423549

Supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Masakazu Minetama1, Mamoru Kawakami1,2, Masatoshi Teraguchi1, Ryohei Kagotani3, Yoshimasa Mera1, Tadashi Sumiya1, Masafumi Nakagawa1, Yoshio Yamamoto1, Sachika Matsuo1, Nana Sakon1, Tomohiro Nakatani1, Tomoko Kitano1, Yukihiro Nakagawa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 1-year outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with supervised physical therapy or unsupervised exercise.
DESIGN: A single-center randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor and intention-to-treat analysis.
SETTING: Spine care center.
SUBJECTS: A total of 86 patients presenting with symptoms of neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis.
INTERVENTIONS: The physical therapy group received supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 6 weeks and home exercise program. The home exercise group received 6-week home exercise program only. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was symptom severity on the Zurich claudication questionnaire at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included physical function, pain, health-related quality of life and the surgery rate after 1 year.
RESULTS: At 1 year, more patients in the physical therapy group than in the home exercise group achieved minimum clinically important differences in Zurich claudication questionnaire symptom severity (60.5% vs 32.6%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.3, [95% CI [1.5-12.3], P = 0.01); Zurich claudication questionnaire physical function (55.8% vs 32.6%; AOR 3.0 [1.1-8.1], P = 0.03); SF-36 bodily pain (48.8% vs 25.6%; AOR 2.8 [1.1-7.3], P = 0.03), and SF-36 general health (20.9% vs 7.0%; AOR 6.1 [1.1-33.0], P = 0.04). The surgery rate at 1 year was lower in the physical therapy than in the home exercise group (7.0% vs 23.3%; AOR 0.2 [0.04-0.9] P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Supervised physical therapy produced greater improvements in symptom severity and physical function than unsupervised exercise and was associated with lower likelihood of receiving surgery within 1 year.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; Physical Therapy; intermittent claudication; lumbar spinal stenosis; surgery rate

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33423549     DOI: 10.1177/0269215520986688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  4 in total

1.  Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Masakazu Minetama; Mamoru Kawakami; Masatoshi Teraguchi; Yoshio Enyo; Masafumi Nakagawa; Yoshio Yamamoto; Sachika Matsuo; Tomohiro Nakatani; Nana Sakon; Yukihiro Nakagawa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 2.  Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Temporiti; Silvano Ferrari; Michael Kieser; Roberto Gatti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Treatment-based classification for low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robson Massi Bastos; Claudia Regina Moya; Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-01-24

4.  The Clinical Effectiveness of a Physiotherapy Delivered Physical and Psychological Group Intervention for Older Adults With Neurogenic Claudication: The BOOST Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Esther Williamson; Graham Boniface; Ioana R Marian; Susan J Dutton; Angela Garrett; Alana Morris; Zara Hansen; Lesley Ward; Philippa J A Nicolson; David Rogers; Karen L Barker; Jeremy C Fairbank; Judith Fitch; David P French; Christine Comer; Christian D Mallen; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.591

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.