Samira Weisselberg1, Sven Oliver Eicker2, Theresa Krätzig3, Klaus Christian Mende2, Malte Mohme2, Simon von Kroge4, Martin Stangenberg5, Marc Dreimann5, Manfred Westphal2. 1. Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. t.kraetzig@uke.de. 4. Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical intervention with intercorporal stabilisation in spinal infections is increasingly needed. Our aim was to compare titanium and polyetheretherketon (PEEK) cages according to their adhesion characteristics of different bacteria species in vitro. METHODS: Plates made from PEEK, polished titanium (Ti), two-surface-titanium (TiMe) (n = 2-3) and original PEEK and porous trabecular structured titanium (TiLi) interbody cages (n = 4) were inoculated in different bacterial solutions, S.aureus (MSSA, MRSA), S.epidermidis and E.coli. Growth characteristics were analysed. Biofilms and bacteria were visualised using confocal- and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Quantitative adherence of MSSA, MRSA, S.epidermidis and E.coli to Ti, TiMe and PEEK plates were different, with polished titanium being mainly advantageous over PEEK and TiMe with significantly less counts of colony forming units (CFU) for MRSA after 56 h compared to TiMe and at 72 h compared to PEEK (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005). For MSSA, more adherent bacteria were detected on PEEK than on TiMe at 32 h (p = 0.02). For PEEK and TiLi cages, significant differences were found after 8 and 72 h for S.epidermidis (p = 0.02 and p = 0.008) and after 72 h for MSSA (p = 0.002) with higher bacterial counts on PEEK, whereas E.coli showed more CFU on TiLi than PEEK (p = 0.05). Electron microscopy demonstrated enhanced adhesion in transition areas. CONCLUSION: For S.epidermidis, MSSA and MRSA PEEK cages showed a higher adherence in terms of CFU count, whereas for E.coli PEEK seemed to be advantageous. Electron microscopic visualisation shows that bacteria did not adhere at the titanium mesh structure, but at the border zones of polished material to rougher parts.
PURPOSE: Surgical intervention with intercorporal stabilisation in spinal infections is increasingly needed. Our aim was to compare titanium and polyetheretherketon (PEEK) cages according to their adhesion characteristics of different bacteria species in vitro. METHODS: Plates made from PEEK, polished titanium (Ti), two-surface-titanium (TiMe) (n = 2-3) and original PEEK and porous trabecular structured titanium (TiLi) interbody cages (n = 4) were inoculated in different bacterial solutions, S.aureus (MSSA, MRSA), S.epidermidis and E.coli. Growth characteristics were analysed. Biofilms and bacteria were visualised using confocal- and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Quantitative adherence of MSSA, MRSA, S.epidermidis and E.coli to Ti, TiMe and PEEK plates were different, with polished titanium being mainly advantageous over PEEK and TiMe with significantly less counts of colony forming units (CFU) for MRSA after 56 h compared to TiMe and at 72 h compared to PEEK (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005). For MSSA, more adherent bacteria were detected on PEEK than on TiMe at 32 h (p = 0.02). For PEEK and TiLi cages, significant differences were found after 8 and 72 h for S.epidermidis (p = 0.02 and p = 0.008) and after 72 h for MSSA (p = 0.002) with higher bacterial counts on PEEK, whereas E.coli showed more CFU on TiLi than PEEK (p = 0.05). Electron microscopy demonstrated enhanced adhesion in transition areas. CONCLUSION: For S.epidermidis, MSSA and MRSA PEEK cages showed a higher adherence in terms of CFU count, whereas for E.coli PEEK seemed to be advantageous. Electron microscopic visualisation shows that bacteria did not adhere at the titanium mesh structure, but at the border zones of polished material to rougher parts.
Authors: Markus Schomacher; Tobias Finger; Daniel Koeppen; Olaf Süss; Peter Vajkoczy; Stefan Kroppenstedt; Mario Cabraja Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Elie F Berbari; Souha S Kanj; Todd J Kowalski; Rabih O Darouiche; Andreas F Widmer; Steven K Schmitt; Edward F Hendershot; Paul D Holtom; Paul M Huddleston; Gregory W Petermann; Douglas R Osmon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin L Ong; Leah Carreon; Heather Watson; Todd Albert; Steven Glassman Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2012-08-24
Authors: Yohan Robinson; Sven Kevin Tschoeke; Thomas Finke; Ralph Kayser; Wolfgang Ertel; Christoph E Heyde Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Curtis T Rueden; Johannes Schindelin; Mark C Hiner; Barry E DeZonia; Alison E Walter; Ellen T Arena; Kevin W Eliceiri Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Sven K Tschöke; Holger Fuchs; Oliver Schmidt; Jens Gulow; Nicolas H von der Hoeh; Christoph-E Heyde Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2015-11-10
Authors: Luiz Gustavo Dal Oglio da Rocha; Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro; Ana Paula de Andrade; Geiziane Aparecida Gonçalves; Letícia Kraft; Juliette Cieslinski; Paula Hansen Suss; Felipe Francisco Tuon Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2021-07-08