Literature DB >> 33422375

Long-term outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular node: The experience of a Portuguese tertiary center.

Ana Mosalina Manuel1, João Almeida2, Paulo Fonseca2, Joel Monteiro3, Cláudio Guerreiro2, Ana Raquel Barbosa2, Pedro Teixeira2, José Ribeiro2, Elisabeth Santos2, Filipa Rosas2, José Ribeiro2, Adelaide Dias2, Daniel Caeiro2, Olga Sousa2, Madalena Teixeira2, Marco Oliveira2, Helena Gonçalves2, João Primo2, Pedro Braga2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and high ventricular rate, unresponsive to rate and rhythm control therapy or catheter ablation, atrioventricular (AV) node ablation may be performed.
OBJECTIVES: To assess long-term outcomes after AV node ablation and to analyze predictors of adverse events.
METHODS: We performed a detailed retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent AV node ablation between February 1997 and February 2019, in a single Portuguese tertiary center.
RESULTS: A total of 123 patients, mean age 69±9 years and 52% male, underwent AV node ablation. Most of them presented atrial fibrillation at baseline (65%). During a median follow-up of 8.5 years (interquartile range 3.8-11.8), patients improved heart failure (HF) functional class (NYHA class III-IV 46% versus 13%, p=0.001), and there were reductions in hospitalizations due to HF (0.98±1.3 versus 0.28±0.8, p=0.001) and emergency department (ED) visits (1.1±1 versus 0.17±0.7, p=0.0001). There were no device-related complications. Despite permanent pacemaker stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction did not worsen (47±13% vs. 47%±12, p=0.63). Twenty-eight patients died (23%). The number of ED visits due to HF before AV node ablation was an independent predictor of the composite adverse outcome (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.24-2.61, p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite pacemaker dependency, the clinical benefit of AV node ablation persisted at long-term follow-up. The number of ED visits due to HF before AV node ablation was an independent predictor of the composite adverse outcome. AV node ablation should probably be considered earlier in the treatment of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and HF, especially in cases that are unsuitable for selective ablation of the specific arrhythmia.
Copyright © 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablação do nódulo auriculoventricular; Atrioventricular node ablation; Disritmias supraventriculares; Heart failure; Insuficiência cardíaca; Supraventricular arrhythmias

Year:  2021        PMID: 33422375     DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2020.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed)        ISSN: 2174-2049


  2 in total

1.  Sex-Related Differences in Patient Selection for and Outcomes after Pace and Ablate for Refractory Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from a Large Multicenter Cohort.

Authors:  Thomas Baumgartner; Miriam Kaelin-Friedrich; Karol Makowski; Fabian Noti; Beat Schaer; Andreas Haeberlin; Patrick Badertscher; Nikola Kozhuharov; Samuel Baldinger; Jens Seiler; Stefan Osswald; Michael Kühne; Laurent Roten; Hildegard Tanner; Christian Sticherling; Tobias Reichlin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  2021 Top 10 Articles in the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia and the Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia.

Authors:  Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira; Pedro Gonçalves-Teixeira; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Nuno Cardim
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.667

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.