Johannes H De Kock1,2, Helen Ann Latham3, Stephen J Leslie4, Mark Grindle5, Sarah-Anne Munoz5, Liz Ellis5, Rob Polson5, Christopher M O'Malley5. 1. University of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK. hannes.dekock@uhi.ac.uk. 2. NHS Highland, Department of Clinical Psychology, New Craigs Hospital, Inverness, IV3 8NP, UK. hannes.dekock@uhi.ac.uk. 3. NHS Highland, Nairn Healthcare Group, Cawdor Rd, Nairn, IV12 5EE, UK. 4. NHS Highland, NHS Highland Cardiac Unit Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, IV2 3UJ, UK. 5. University of the Highlands and Islands, Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health and social care workers (HSCWs) have carried a heavy burden during the COVID-19 crisis and, in the challenge to control the virus, have directly faced its consequences. Supporting their psychological wellbeing continues, therefore, to be a priority. This rapid review was carried out to establish whether there are any identifiable risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes amongst HSCWs during the COVID-19 crisis. METHODS: We undertook a rapid review of the literature following guidelines by the WHO and the Cochrane Collaboration's recommendations. We searched across 14 databases, executing the search at two different time points. We included published, observational and experimental studies that reported the psychological effects on HSCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: The 24 studies included in this review reported data predominantly from China (18 out of 24 included studies) and most sampled urban hospital staff. Our study indicates that COVID-19 has a considerable impact on the psychological wellbeing of front-line hospital staff. Results suggest that nurses may be at higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes during this pandemic, but no studies compare this group with the primary care workforce. Furthermore, no studies investigated the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social care staff. Other risk factors identified were underlying organic illness, gender (female), concern about family, fear of infection, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and close contact with COVID-19. Systemic support, adequate knowledge and resilience were identified as factors protecting against adverse mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to date suggests that female nurses with close contact with COVID-19 patients may have the most to gain from efforts aimed at supporting psychological well-being. However, inconsistencies in findings and a lack of data collected outside of hospital settings, suggest that we should not exclude any groups when addressing psychological well-being in health and social care workers. Whilst psychological interventions aimed at enhancing resilience in the individual may be of benefit, it is evident that to build a resilient workforce, occupational and environmental factors must be addressed. Further research including social care workers and analysis of wider societal structural factors is recommended.
BACKGROUND: Health and social care workers (HSCWs) have carried a heavy burden during the COVID-19 crisis and, in the challenge to control the virus, have directly faced its consequences. Supporting their psychological wellbeing continues, therefore, to be a priority. This rapid review was carried out to establish whether there are any identifiable risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes amongst HSCWs during the COVID-19 crisis. METHODS: We undertook a rapid review of the literature following guidelines by the WHO and the Cochrane Collaboration's recommendations. We searched across 14 databases, executing the search at two different time points. We included published, observational and experimental studies that reported the psychological effects on HSCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: The 24 studies included in this review reported data predominantly from China (18 out of 24 included studies) and most sampled urban hospital staff. Our study indicates that COVID-19 has a considerable impact on the psychological wellbeing of front-line hospital staff. Results suggest that nurses may be at higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes during this pandemic, but no studies compare this group with the primary care workforce. Furthermore, no studies investigated the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social care staff. Other risk factors identified were underlying organic illness, gender (female), concern about family, fear of infection, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and close contact with COVID-19. Systemic support, adequate knowledge and resilience were identified as factors protecting against adverse mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to date suggests that female nurses with close contact with COVID-19patients may have the most to gain from efforts aimed at supporting psychological well-being. However, inconsistencies in findings and a lack of data collected outside of hospital settings, suggest that we should not exclude any groups when addressing psychological well-being in health and social care workers. Whilst psychological interventions aimed at enhancing resilience in the individual may be of benefit, it is evident that to build a resilient workforce, occupational and environmental factors must be addressed. Further research including social care workers and analysis of wider societal structural factors is recommended.
Authors: Samantha Kelly Brooks; Rebecca Dunn; Richard Amlôt; Gideon James Rubin; Neil Greenberg Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Robert W Aldridge; Dan Lewer; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Rohini Mathur; Neha Pathak; Rachel Burns; Ellen B Fragaszy; Anne M Johnson; Delan Devakumar; Ibrahim Abubakar; Andrew Hayward Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2020-06-24
Authors: Nicholas W S Chew; Grace K H Lee; Benjamin Y Q Tan; Mingxue Jing; Yihui Goh; Nicholas J H Ngiam; Leonard L L Yeo; Aftab Ahmad; Faheem Ahmed Khan; Ganesh Napolean Shanmugam; Arvind K Sharma; R N Komalkumar; P V Meenakshi; Kenam Shah; Bhargesh Patel; Bernard P L Chan; Sibi Sunny; Bharatendu Chandra; Jonathan J Y Ong; Prakash R Paliwal; Lily Y H Wong; Renarebecca Sagayanathan; Jin Tao Chen; Alison Ying Ying Ng; Hock Luen Teoh; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Cyrus S Ho; Roger C Ho; Vijay K Sharma Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Jonathan Jubin; Philippe Delmas; Ingrid Gilles; Annie Oulevey Bachmann; Claudia Ortoleva Bucher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yasuhiro Kotera; Robert Maxwell-Jones; Ann-Marie Edwards; Natalie Knutton Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez; Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez; Pablo Ruisoto; Athanasios A Dalamitros; Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco; Alberto Hormeño-Holgado; Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas; Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Valentina Elisabetta Di Mattei; Gaia Perego; Francesca Milano; Martina Mazzetti; Paola Taranto; Rossella Di Pierro; Chiara De Panfilis; Fabio Madeddu; Emanuele Preti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 3.390