Literature DB >> 33421972

Cadaver versus simulator based arthroscopic training in shoulder surgery

Gazi Huri1, Mert Ruşen Gülşen2, Ece Belen Karmış3, Doğaç Karagüven4.   

Abstract

Introduction: There are few studies that compare the cadaver dissections with the medical simulators in means of talent improvement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to find out if using cadaver dissections is still the golden standard for surgical training or using the medical simulators in surgery could replace cadaver dissections. Materials and methods: The study is conducted during the European Orthopaedics & Traumatology Education Platform accredited Shoulder Club International Cadaver Course including a number of 34 orthopedics trainees. The participants were randomly divided into two groups to be trained with the simulator (Group 1) and on cadavers (Group 2), followed by a test performed on shoulder arthroscopy simulator (Virtamed ArthroS, Switzerland). There was no conflict of interest before, during, or after the study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Results: Group 2 had statistically significant higher simulation overview procedure time values than Group 1 (p < 0.05), the meaning of which is participants trained with the simulator completed the given tasks in a shorter period of time. Group 2 had statistically significant higher scratching of humerus cartilage values than Group 1 (p < 0.05), which means that participants trained with simulation have less scratching done on the humerus cartilage than the participants trained on a cadaver.
Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to compare virtual reality (VR) simulators with cadavers for surgical education in an objective manner, while using qualitative and quantitative data. According to this study, it is possible to state that VR simulators are just as effective as cadavers in means of training subjects. As medical education will face a total change all around the world after the COVID-19 pandemic, this study has the potential to be an important guide during and after this period. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; simulator; education; shoulder; coronavirus

Year:  2021        PMID: 33421972     DOI: 10.3906/sag-2011-71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Med Sci        ISSN: 1300-0144            Impact factor:   0.973


  4 in total

1.  The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Haixia Zhou; Chengyao Xian; Kai-Jun Zhang; Zhouwen Yang; Wei Li; Jing Tian
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

2.  CORR Insights®: Is the Virtual Reality Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training Program a Valid Platform for Resident Arthroscopy Training?

Authors:  Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Cross-Sectional Study on the Comparative Assessment of Mandibular Anesthesia (Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blockage) Manual Skills Shaping among Dentists on Plastic and Biomaterial Models.

Authors:  Yuriy Vasil'ev; Ekaterina Diachkova; Hadi Darawsheh; Artem Kashtanov; Ekaterina Molotok; Beatrice Volel; Artem Batov; Olesya Kytko; Rinat Saleev; Gulshat Saleeva; Laysan Saleeva; Irina Smilyk; Natalya Tiunova
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

4.  Transformation of neurosurgical training from "see one, do one, teach one" to AR/VR & simulation - A survey by the EANS Young Neurosurgeons.

Authors:  Felix C Stengel; Maria L Gandia-Gonzalez; Cristina C Aldea; Jiri Bartek; Diogo Belo; Netanel Ben-Shalom; María F De la Cerda-Vargas; Evangelos Drosos; Christian F Freyschlag; Stanislav Kaprovoy; Milan Lepic; Laura Lippa; Katrin Rabiei; Giovanni Raffa; Bayron A Sandoval-Bonilla; Michael Schwake; Toma Spiriev; Cesare Zoia; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-08-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.