Literature DB >> 33421069

Bisphenol S is present in culture media used for ART and cell culture.

A Togola1, A Desmarchais2, O Téteau2, C Vignault2,3, V Maillard2, C Buron2, S Bristeau1, F Guérif2,3, A Binet2,4, S Elis2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Do plastic laboratory consumables and cell culture media used in ART contain bisphenols? SUMMARY ANSWER: The majority of human embryo culture media assessed contained bisphenol S close to the nanomolar concentration range, while no release of bisphenols by plastic consumables was detected under routine conditions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The deleterious effect of the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A (BPA) on female fertility raised concerns regarding ART outcome. BPA was detected neither in media nor in the majority of plastic consumables used in ART; however, it might have already been replaced by its structural analogs, including bisphenol S (BPS). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Seventeen plastic consumables and 18 cell culture and ART media were assessed for the presence of bisphenols. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Ten different bisphenols (bisphenol A, S, AF, AP, B, C, E, F, P and Z) were measured using an isotopic dilution according to an on-line solid phase extraction/liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: While the plastic consumables did not release bisphenols under routine conditions, 16 of the 18 cell culture and ART media assessed contained BPS. Six media exhibited BPS concentrations higher than 1 nM and reached up to 6.7 nM (1693 ng/l). LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Further studies are required to investigate a greater number of ART media to identify less potentially harmful ones, in terms of bisphenol content. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: As BPS has already been reported to impair oocyte quality at nanomolar concentrations, its presence in ART media, at a similar concentration range, could contribute to a decrease in the ART success rate. Thus far, there has been no regulation of these compounds in the ART context. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was financially supported by the 'Centre-Val de Loire' Region (Bemol project, APR IR 2017), INRAE, BRGM, the French National Research Agency (project ANR-18-CE34-0011-01 MAMBO) and the BioMedicine Agency (Project 18AMP006 FertiPhenol). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the reported research.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproduction; cell culture / plastic consumables / bisphenols / culture media; endocrine disruptors; female infertility; oocyte quality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33421069      PMCID: PMC7970731          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


Introduction

Researchers have questioned the relation between the increase in human infertility observed in western countries and the impact of environmental factors, especially endocrine disruptors. Previous studies reported positive correlations between the outcome of IVF and embryo transfer and the levels of pollutants in female follicular fluids (Al-Saleh ; Jirsova ). Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widespread plasticizer, mainly used in polycarbonate monomers, epoxy resins and thermal papers, owing to its heat resistance and elasticity properties (reviewed in Abraham and Chakraborty, 2020). BPA has been extensively used for several decades in the plastic industry, particularly to produce food containers, baby bottles and metal cans. However, it has also been used in medical devices, soaps, lotions, shampoo, nail polish, sunscreen and toys (Eladak ; Giulivo ; Andaluri ; Kirchnawy ). Humans are primarily exposed to BPA through diet, as a result of container-content transfer (Kang ; Kubwabo ; Andra ), but also through indoor dust inhalation (Liao ) and the transcutaneous route (Thayer ). Widespread BPA use has led to its detection in 95% of patient urine samples in the USA, at concentrations ≥0.1 ng/ml (0.44 nM; Calafat ; Calafat ), with an average urine and blood concentration of 1–3 ng/ml (4–13 nM; Eladak ). The deleterious effects of BPA on health have previously been reported (Richter ; Wetherill ; Rochester, 2013). Low BPA concentrations (in the nanomolar range) are associated with obesity, cardiovascular diseases (Lang ; Rochester, 2013), type 2 diabetes (Grun and Blumberg, 2007; Lang ) and alterations in reproductive function (Peretz ). BPA is an endocrine disruptor. It indeed exhibits a weak oestrogenic activity (Nadal ). Moreover, the highest urinary BPA concentrations in women undergoing ART are associated with decreased oocyte number and quality, and reduced oestradiol levels (Mok-Lin ; Fujimoto ; Ehrlich ). BPA reportedly also disrupts steroid production in rat, ovine, porcine and human granulosa cells (Mlynarcikova ; Zhou ; Grasselli ; Mansur ; Banerjee ; Bujnakova Mlynarcikova and Scsukova, 2018; Samardzija ; Teteau ). The data suggesting a deleterious effect of BPA on female fertility raised concerns regarding the ART outcome. BPA was not detected in ART media and its presence in plastic consumables used in ART did not lead to a significant leaching into the media (Gatimel ). Nevertheless, BPA might not have been detected because it has already been replaced by its structural analogs. Several studies demonstrated that BPA restriction in some countries [EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processings Aids (CEF), 2015; Usman and Ahmad, 2016] led to an increased human exposure to bisphenol S (BPS), an unregulated BPA structural analog (Ye ). Therefore, BPS is now being derespectivetected in urine at the same concentration range as BPA [0.02–21 ng/ml or 0.09–91 nM; (Liao )]. BPS and BPA shared a disruptive effect on ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis (Teteau ). Their structural analogy suggests that BPS and BPA might exhibit similar properties and adverse health effects (Eladak ; Ahsan ; Campen ; Ijaz ). BPS also disrupts steroid secretion in human granulosa cells and negatively affects ewe oocyte quality in vitro, even at nanomalar concentrations (Amar ; Desmarchais ). There is a need for experimental data to support the hypothesis of the endocrine disrupting properties of bisphenols, but their ubiquitous use, even in research laboratories, makes it more difficult to perform robust assays. In Europe, bisphenols are regulated in food-grade plastic, in which only BPA and BPS are authorized (European Union, 2019). In contrast, plastic-containing devices used for biological assays and for oocyte and embryo handling (for both research applications and ART) could contain other bisphenols that are poorly studied regarding their endocrine disrupting properties. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to investigate whether plastic consumables contained bisphenols, determine if they leach into media under conditions close to those used in routine practice and assess bisphenol presence in ART and cell culture media. Because several bisphenols that are structural analogs of BPA are already used in the industry, we decided to assess 10 different bisphenols: BPA, BPS, bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol AP (BPAP), bisphenol B (BPB), bisphenol C (BPC), bisphenol E (BPE), bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol P (BPP) and bisphenol Z (BPZ) (Table I).
Table I

List and formula of the 10 bisphenols assessed in plastic consumables and ART/culture media.

Abbreviation and structural nameStructural formulaCAS numberMW g/mol

BPA—Bisphenol A

 

4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol

80-05-7228.3

BPAF—Bisphenol AF

 

4-[1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propan-2-yl]phenol

1478-61-1336.2

BPAP—Bisphenol AP

 

4,4′-(1-Phenylethylidene)bisphenol

1571-75-1290.4

BPB—Bisphenol B

 

2,2-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)butane

77-40-7242.3

BPC—Bisphenol C

 

2,2-Bis(4-hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)propane

79-97-0256.3

BPE—Bisphenol E

 

1,1-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethane

2081-08-5214.3

BPF—Bisphenol F

 

Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)methane

620-92-8200.2

BPP—Bisphenol P

 

4,4′-(1,4-Phenylenediisopropylidene)bisphenol

2167-51-3346.5

BPS—Bisphenol S

 

4,4'-Sulfonyldiphenol

80-09-1250.3

BPZ—Bisphenol Z

 

4,4′-Cyclohexylidenebisphenol

843-55-0268.4

CAS, Chemical Abstracts Service; MW, molecular weight.

List and formula of the 10 bisphenols assessed in plastic consumables and ART/culture media. BPABisphenol A 4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol BPAF—Bisphenol AF 4-[1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propan-2-yl]phenol BPAP—Bisphenol AP 4,4′-(1-Phenylethylidene)bisphenol BPBBisphenol B 2,2-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)butane BPCBisphenol C 2,2-Bis(4-hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)propane BPEBisphenol E 1,1-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethane BPFBisphenol F Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)methane BPPBisphenol P 4,4′-(1,4-Phenylenediisopropylidene)bisphenol BPSBisphenol S 4,4'-Sulfonyldiphenol BPZBisphenol Z 4,4′-Cyclohexylidenebisphenol CAS, Chemical Abstracts Service; MW, molecular weight.

Materials and methods

The aim of this study was to assess the bisphenols released by plastic consumables or that are present in cell culture and ART media. Therefore, no biological materials were needed, and ethics committee approval was irrelevant.

Plastic consumables

The 17 plastic consumables tested were those used in either a research center focused on granulosa cell culture and embryo production (INRAE Centre Val de Loire, UMR Physiology of Reproduction, Nouzilly, France) or in an ART center (Service de Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction, CHRU de Tours, France). The list of plastic consumables assessed is defined in Table II. Both polystyrene- and polypropylene-based plastics were assessed. The consumables used to collect samples (oocyte or embryo) (tubes, tips), select samples (plastic dishes), cultivate them (cell culture plates or flasks, 4-well petri dishes) or store them (cryopreservation tubes) were evaluated. We also tested media plastic bottles for potential leaching of bisphenols.
Table II

List of plastic consumables assessed for the presence of bisphenols.

Sample numberProduct typeBrandOriginNamePlasticUseProduct reference
150 ml tubesClearline, Dominique DutscherFrancePolystyrene centrifuge tube 50 ml sterilePSRL380502
215 ml tubesFalcon BD BiosciencesUSA Tube with conical bottom 15 ml (on base) Falcon®PPRL352097
314 ml tubesVitrolife Sweden Oocyte collection tube 14 mlPS ART16101 
41.5 ml tubesEppendorf Germany Eppendorf Safe-Lock Tube 1.5 ml, Biopur, individually sealed PP ART0030 121-589 
5Tips for oocyte holding and medium preparationFisher scientificFrance Fisherbrand™ SureOne™ 1000 µl Filter TipPPRL11977724
6VWR USA Sterile Aerosol Pipet Tips  PPART732-0560 
7Gilson Germany D1000ST Diamond Tipack PP ARTF171501 
8Plates for cell cultureThermo scientificKoreaBioLite 96 Microwell PlatePSRL130188
9Flask for cell cultureFalcon BD Biosciences USA Tissue Culture Flask 50 ml PSRL353014 
10Culture medium bottlesSigma-AldrichUKplastic bottles of Medium 199PPRLM4530
11Plastic dishes for oocyte collection VWRItaly Petri dish 90 mm PS ART391-0556 
12Thermo scientificDenmarkNunc IVF Petri Dish 35 × 10mm Non treatedPS ART150255 
13Plastic dishes for oocyte maturation and fertilization/embryo cultureFalcon BD BiosciencesUSAEASY GRIP Petri dish—35 × 10 mmPSRL353001
14Thermo scientificDenmarkNunclon Delta surface treated 4-well dishPSART176740
15Thermo scientific USA  IVF ICSI Dish PS ART150265 
16Vitrolife Sweden 5 Well Culture Dish PS ART16004 
17Tubes for gonadal tissue cryopreservationThermo scientific USA  Nunc Cryotube vials ART375353 

ART, consumables used in ART labs; RL, consumables used in research labs; PP, polypropylene; PS: polystyrene.

List of plastic consumables assessed for the presence of bisphenols. ART, consumables used in ART labs; RL, consumables used in research labs; PP, polypropylene; PS: polystyrene. First, plastic consumables were either filled with methanol or cut into pieces and embedded in methanol for 24 h at 40 °C (Table III). These experiments are based on migration tests required for plastic food as stipulated in the Commission Regulation EU 10/2011. Ten bisphenols were then measured (BPA, BPS, BPAF, BPAP, BPB, BPC, BPE, BPF, BPP and BPZ, see below). Each measurement was performed in triplicate.
Table III

Bisphenols detected after solvent leaching of the plastic consumables.

Bisphenols (LOQ in ng/l)
Sample numberProduct typeSolvent volume (ml)Exposure frameBPA (10)BPS (2)BPAF (5)BPAP (10)BPB (5)BPC (5)BPE (2)BPF (5)BPP (10)BPZ (10)
1 50 ml tubes20Direct filling in the vial103 ± 7913 ± 6 96 ± 64 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
215 ml tubes10108 ± 1014 ± 145 ± 14NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
314 ml tubes 232 ± 152 ± 08 ± 4NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
41.5 ml tubes1.565 ± 88 ± 47 ± 2NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
5 Tips10Cutting into pieces and transferred in glass vial 308 ± 62 30 ± 7 30 ± 3NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
64118 ± 8319 ± 955 ± 8NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
7 8 736 ± 303 85 ± 5 52 ± 19NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
8Plates for cell culture55 ml divided into 16 wells for each replicate31(1)4 ± 254 ± 16NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
9 Flask for cell culture10Direct filling in the vial57 ± 365 ± 2 195 ± 108 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
10 Culture medium bottles2532 ± 24 712 ± 1205 229 ± 35 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
11Plastic dishes for oocyte collection593 ± 807 ± 116 ± 11NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
12216 ± 53 ± 116 ± 10NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
13Plastic dishes for oocyte maturation/embryo culture234 ± 154 ± 211 ± 2NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
141.51.5 ml divided in 3 wells for each replicate13 ± 32 ± 012 ± 1NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
152Direct filling in the vial48 ± 42 ± 15 ± 1NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
1633 ml divided in 3 wells for each replicate29 ± 43 ± 18 ± 1NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
17Tubes for embryo cryopreservation1Direct filling in the vial87 ± 674 ± 29 ± 2NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
ref1-2ml271 ± 263 ± 18(1)NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
ref2-10ml1054 ± 164 ± 129 ± 3NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
ref3-10ml10Direct filling in the vial for 24 h at 40°C25 ± 148 ± 117 ± 6NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ

LOQ, limit of quantification, mentioned below each bisphenols in parentheses; NQ: not quantifiable; bold text: significant difference with the controls P < 0.0001, non-parametric one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test were performed.

Bisphenols detected after solvent leaching of the plastic consumables. LOQ, limit of quantification, mentioned below each bisphenols in parentheses; NQ: not quantifiable; bold text: significant difference with the controls P < 0.0001, non-parametric one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test were performed. A second leaching test with pure water was implemented on materials having strong positive results in the leaching test with methanol. For each of these products, a second experiment mimicking the conditions close to routine practice, regarding duration of the experiment, were performed (Table IV). For tips, water was pumped through them 10 times before transfer into a glass vial. Controls were realized in parallel in glass vials, using the same water storage conditions used for the leaching tests. All 10 bisphenols were then measured (see below). Each measurement was performed in triplicate.
Table IV

Routine conditions of our experiments applied to plastic consumables containing bisphenols.

Sample numberBrandNameTemperatureDurationVolume of water
1Clearline, Dominique Dutscher50 ml Centrifuge tube4°C2 weeks50 ml
5Fisher scientificFisherbrand™ SureOne™ 1000 µl Filter TipRoom temperature30 s1 ml
7Gilson D1000ST Diamond Tipack Room temperature30 s1 ml
9Falcon BD BiosciencesTissue Culture Flask 50 ml 37°C48 h10 ml
10Sigma-Aldrichmedium bottles4°C1 month100 ml
Routine conditions of our experiments applied to plastic consumables containing bisphenols. List of culture media assessed for the presence of bisphenols. BEP, bovine embryo production; Gl, glass vial; Pl, plastic vial; RL, research laboratory.

Cell culture and ART media

Eighteen cell culture media that are usually used for oocyte collection (Medium 199 with Hepes, BO-HEPES-IVM), maturation (Medium 199, BO-IVM), fertilization (BO-IVF) and embryo development (BO-IVC) in ruminants for granulosa cell culture (McCoy’s 5A medium) and for ART in women (SAGE 1-step, Global, Sequential Fert, Sequential Cleav, Sequential Blast, etc.) were assessed for 10 bisphenols (Table V). For media assessment, each measurement (therefore each sample number) corresponded to sampling in separate bottles. In one case (Medium 199), because the BPS level was quite high, several measurements of the same bottle (sample number 19) and of separate bottles of the same batch (sample number 19-21) were assessed. Triplicate measurements were performed when possible and the complete dataset including all replicates is provided in Supplementary Tables SI and SII (in ng/l and nM, respectively). Each sample was analysed directly and after a 10-fold dilution in pure water to avoid a potential matrix effect caused by salts in the media. Two types of controls were associated with this measurement: controls with ultrapure water and each media spiked with a solution of bisphenols (Table VI).
Table V

List of culture media assessed for the presence of bisphenols.

Sample numberProduct typeBrandOriginNameVialUseProduct reference
18-19Cell culture mediumSigma-AldrichUKMcCoy 5A MediumPlRLM8403
20-21Oocyte retrieval, holding and washing mediaOrigio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkSynvitroflushPlART15840125A
22-23Origio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkFlushing mediumPlART10840060A
24Ivf BioscienceUKBO-WASHGlBEP61008
25Sigma-AldrichUKMedium 199 with HepesPlBEPM7528
26IVM mediaIvf BioscienceUKBO-IVMGlBEP61002
27Ivf BioscienceUKBO-HEPES-IVMGlBEP61009
28Sperm preparation and IVF mediaIvf BioscienceUKBO-IVFGlBEP61003
29–30Origio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkGradient 40/80PlART84022060A
31–32Origio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkSequential FertPlART83010060A
33Origio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkUniversal IVF mediumPlART10310060A
34–36 In vitro development mediaOrigio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkSAGE 1-Step™PlART67010010A
37Origio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkSequential CleavPlART83040010A
38Origio, Cooper surgicalDenmarkSequential BlastPlART83060010A
39LifeGlobalUSAGlobalPlARTLGGG-020
40Ivf BioscienceUKBO-IVCGlBEP61001
41–45Sigma-AldrichUK Medium 199PlBEPM4530
46Embryo washing and handling mediaLifeGlobalUSAGlobal with HEPESPlARTLGGH-050

BEP, bovine embryo production; Gl, glass vial; Pl, plastic vial; RL, research laboratory.

Table VI

Bisphenol assessment in cell culture and ART media (in ng/l).

Bisphenols (LOQ in ng/l)
Sample numberProduct typeNameReference numberBatch numberUseBPA (10)BPS (2)BPE (10)BPF (5)BPAF (5)BPAP (10)BPB (5)BPC (15)BPP (10)BPZ (10)
18Cell culture mediumMcCoy's 5A MediumM8403SLCB0586RLNQ 74 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
19SLCB7211NQ 395 NQNQ5NQNQNQNQNQ
20Oocyte retrieval, holding and washing mediaSynvitroflush15840125A20250050ARTNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
2120150031NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
22Flushing medium10840060A20280036ARTNQ 456 ± 3 12 ± 0.3 15 ± 0.6NQNQNQNQNQNQ
23200400445 ± 0.4 436 ± 3 28 ± 0.3 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
24BO-WASH61008WASH1704BEPNQ 35 ± 0.2 NQ6 ± 0.1NQNQNQNQNQNQ
25Medium 199 with HepesM7528RNBG6724BEP2830815NQNQ14NQNQNQNQ
26 In vitro maturation mediaBO-IVM61002IVM1701NBEP28 ± 1.4 53 ± 0.9 NQ17 ± 1.4NQ16 ± 0.5NQNQNQNQ
27BO-HEPES-IVM61009IVMH1602NBEP 155 ± 2 23 ± 0.6 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
28Sperm preparation and IVF mediaBO-IVF61003IVF1702NBEP 62 ± 1 112 ± 2 64 ± 1 NQNQ38 ± 1.7NQNQNQNQ
29Gradient 40/8084022060 A20110060ARTNQ 67 ± 1 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
3020180042NQ 21 ± 1 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
31Sequential Fert83010060A20190042ARTNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
3220220035NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
33Universal IVF medium10310060 A20270017ARTNQ 750 ± 24 18 ± 0.6 20 ± 1.510 ± 0.4NQNQNQNQNQ
34 In vitro development mediaSAGE 1-step67010010A19370063ARTNQ 283 16 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
351929006112 394 18 NQ11NQNQNQNQNQ
3620270046NQ 337 ± 2 NQ9 ± 1.3NQNQNQNQNQNQ
37Sequential Cleav83040010A20320064ART18 ± 0.7 179 ± 4 7 ± 1.3 8 ± 1.27 ± 0.5NQNQNQNQNQ
38Sequential Blast83060010A20330063ART4 ± 0.6 187 ± 20 NQ3 ± 0.35 ± 0.1NQNQNQNQNQ
39GlobalLGGG-020LGGG-200824UARTNQ10 ± 0.1NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
40BO-IVC61001IVC1703NBEP34 ± 3.8 322 ± 4 119 ± 6 25 ± 2.6NQ16 ± 0.6NQNQNQNQ
41Medium 199—100 ml bottleM4530RNBH8521BEPNQ 278 165NQNQNQNQNQNQ
42RNBG5443NQ 1188 ± 23 26 ± 4.618 ± 2.3NQNQNQNQNQNQ
43RNBG5443NQ 1693 3316NQNQNQNQNQNQ
44RNBG5443NQ 1220 2118NQNQNQNQNQNQ
45RNBH6994NQ 233 NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ
46Embryo washing and handling mediaGlobal with HEPESLGGH-050LGGH-200820CARTNQ5 ± 0.1NQNQNQNQNQNQNQNQ

NQ, not quantifiable; LOQ, mentioned below each bisphenols between brackets; each sample number corresponds to a separate vial; bold text: significant difference with the controls P < 0.0001, non-parametric one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test were performed; sample number 18, 19, 25, 34, 35, 41, 43, 44 and 45 were not analysed in triplicate.

Bisphenol assessment in cell culture and ART media (in ng/l). NQ, not quantifiable; LOQ, mentioned below each bisphenols between brackets; each sample number corresponds to a separate vial; bold text: significant difference with the controls P < 0.0001, non-parametric one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test were performed; sample number 18, 19, 25, 34, 35, 41, 43, 44 and 45 were not analysed in triplicate.

Bisphenol measurements

HPLC-grade methanol, acetic acid and water were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Illkirch, France). Analytical standards of bisphenols were purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (VWR International, Fontenay sous Bois, France), CIL-Cluzeau (Sainte-Foy-La Grande, France), Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) and Techlab (Saint-Julien-lès-Metz, France) as powder (purity> 95%). Bisphenols were measured using an isotopic dilution, according to an on-line solid phase extraction/liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) method. One milliliter of sample was spiked with 100 µl of solution containing internal standards (2 µg/l). Of this, 500 µl was injected into the on-line extraction cartridge (Xbridge C18 Direct Connect HP 10 µm, 2.1 mm × 30 mm, 1.8 µm; Waters) coupled with UPLC/MS-MS equipped with an HSS T3 analytical column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 µm; Waters). Detection was carried out using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (XEVO-TQXS; Waters), fitted with an ESI interface (negative mode) and controlled by MassLynx software (Waters Corporation, Milford MA, USA). Specific and intense product ions of each target analyte were used for quantification, and a secondary product ion was used as a qualifier ion for confirmatory purposes. Method quantification limits are indicated in Tables III and VI. The method has been validated on a linear range from the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 1000 ng/l (except for BPP limited to 300 ng/l). Recoveries ranged on water samples between 80% (BPP) and 100% with a high level of repeatability from 3% to 10% (for BPP). Absolute recoveries of bisphenols from media were lower (from 40% to 85%) but totally outweighted by the internal standards that confirmed the need for using isotopic dilution for measurements. Owing to high specificity of each media regarding the matrix, controls concerning potential matrix interference effects have been systematically assessed and results confirmed by spiking or diluting samples when needed. All solvents and steps for the analytical procedure were checked separately to avoid systematic contamination: no pollution from the solvents has been highlighted.

Statistical analyses

The levels of each bisphenol, found in either plastic consumables or cell culture media, were compared among the groups in Rcmdr [R package Rcmdr (Fox, 2005)], R version 4.0.0 (R Core Team, 2015), using non parametric one-way ANOVA [R package lmPerm (Wheeler and Torchiano, 2010)], with the Tukey post hoc test (R package nparcomp; Konietschke ). A difference of P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

After 24 h of methanol action, the 17 plastic consumables listed in Table II were assessed for the presence of 10 bisphenols. BPA, BPS and BPAF were detected in all 17 plastic consumables (Table III). In contrast, BPAP, BPB, BPC, BPE, BPF, BPP and BPZ were detected in none of the consumables. Regarding the level of bisphenols detected compared to the LOQ, five consumables showed a systematic high level of bisphenols (at least 15 times more than the LOQ). BPAF was detected at a high level in sample number 1 (50 ml centrifuge tube) and 9 (cell culture flask). Both BPA and BPS were detected in tips (sample number 5 and 7). Both BPS and BPAF were detected in bottles of cell culture media (sample number 10). This experiment was based on plastic dissolution in methanol: the bisphenol level in and of itself is only a proxy of the plastic composition and has no real meaning on the potential leaching in culture media. We therefore performed a leaching test on these five plastic consumables (sample numbers 1, 5, 7, 9 and 10) under conditions close to those used in routine practice (Table IV). No quantification of bisphenols, neither in leaching water nor in controls, was reported. We provided the level of bisphenols detected in both ng/l (Table VI) and in nM (Supplementary Tables SI and SII) to be able to compare our data to the literature. BPS was the main bisphenol detected in the cell culture media assessed (Table VI). Nevertheless, six bisphenols (BPA, BPS, BPAF, BPAP, BPE and BPF) were found among the 18 culture media assessed, while BPB, BPC, BPP and BPZ were never detected. BPAP was detected in four media and reached 38 ng/l (0.13 nM) in BO-IVF, BPAF was detected in five media and reached 10 ng/l (0.03 nM) in Universal IVF Medium, BPF was detected in nine media and reached 25 ng/l (0.12 nM) in BO-IVC, BPE was detected in eight media and reached 119 ng/l (0.55 nM) in BO-IVC, BPA was detected in nine media and reached 155 ng/l (0.68 nM) in BO-HEPES-IVM and BPS was detected in 16 of the 18 media assessed. BPS was the bisphenol detected at the highest level in all cases: up to 1693 ng/l (6.8 nM) in Medium 199. BPS exceeded 1 nM in six media: 308 ng/l in Medium 199 with Hepes (1.23 nM), 322 ng/l in BO-IVC (1.28 nM), 338 ng/l in SAGE-1 Step (1.35 nM), 446 ng/l in Flushing Medium (1.78 nM), 750 ng/l in Universal IVF Medium (3.0 nM) and 922 ng/l in Medium 199 (3.69 nM).

Discussion

This study aimed to evaluate the presence and/or leaching of 10 bisphenols in plastic consumables and in cell culture and ART media. For the first time, we reported that cell culture media contained bisphenols, notably BPS in nanomolar range concentrations. Moreover, while plastic consumables contain bisphenols, they do not leach detectable levels of bisphenols in conditions close to those used in routine practice. This study highlighted the need for assessing more ART media for the presence of endocrine disruptors. The finding that raised the most concerns in the present study is the level of BPS detected in cell culture and ART media. Indeed, the BPS level was above 1 nM (0.25 ng/ml) in six media among 18 tested and reached up to 6.8 nM (1.7 ng/ml). BPA was also detected in nine media and reached up to 0.68 nM (0.15 ng/ml). Comparatively, undetectable BPA levels were reported for three and four ART media, respectively (Mahalingaiah ; Gatimel ). Undetectable meant below the respective LOQ of these studies, 0.27 (Mahalingaiah ) or 0.5 ng/ml (Gatimel ). To our knowledge, there are no data in the literature reporting BPS presence in cell culture media thus far. Regarding BPS exposure, the level measured in culture media in this study (up to 1.7 ng/ml) is not above the level found in some human fluids (up to 21 ng/ml in urine) (Liao ). Nevertheless, in this study, the level of BPS was measured after glucuronidase treatment of the sample and, therefore, included both BPS (native form) and BPS glucuronide (metabolized form). Moreover, a recent study reported a deleterious effect of 10 nM BPS during 24 h oocyte maturation on ovine oocyte quality, measured in terms of blastocyst rate after in vitro embryo production (Desmarchais ). Even a lower concentration of BPS (3 nM) during 48 h oocyte maturation in porcine was reported to significantly reduce the rate of oocytes reaching metaphase II (Zalmanova ). In the present study, the BPS level measured in the media is in the same range of concentrations (nanomolar range) as the ones affecting oocyte quality in ovine and porcine. Moreover, ovine and porcine oocytes were exposed to BPS for 24 or 48 h, respectively, only during oocyte maturation. It is still possible that the oocyte maturation stage is more sensitive to the impact of BPS compared to the fertilization and/or early embryo development stages. Nevertheless, during ART, the embryo stayed up to 6 days in the culture medium and, therefore, can be affected by the BPS present in the medium. In addition, BPS was not in the glucuronide form in the medium. The cumulus-oocyte complex likely does not possess the required cellular machinery to transform BPS into its inactive form, BPS glucuronide, meaning that the effect of BPS will last for the duration of the culture. This is different from what happens in vivo, as the glucuronidation of bisphenols occurs rapidly after exposure. Therefore, even if the duration of exposure is short (up to 6 days), the effects might not be negligible compared to a similar in vivo exposure. Moreover, a BPA exposure during early embryo development in bovine (Choi ) and murine (Pan ) decreased the blastocyst rate and damaged blastocyst development, suggesting an effect not only on oocyte quality but also on early embryo development. These findings raise concerns about the effect of BPS contained in the media on the outcome of ART and suggested the importance of investigating a wider diversity of ART media. Moreover, the presence of bisphenols in cell culture media also raises concerns on results reported in the literature regarding bisphenol effects on cells, oocytes or embryos. These results should be analysed with caution, especially when dealing with nanomolar concentrations of bisphenols, or even lower. Regarding a potential cocktail effect, even if other bisphenols are less abundant than BPS, the culture media still contained five other bisphenols (BPA, BPAF, BPAP, BPE and BPF). Their cumulative or potentially synergetic effects have not yet been studied on the oocyte. Such accumulation of exogenous molecules can strengthen their deleterious effects on oocyte quality. It is also important to keep in mind that the present study only focused on the bisphenol family. Therefore, only bisphenols have been detected and measured in the culture medium. It is likely that other exogenous molecules could be found in the ART medium, such as phthalates, as is the case in food containers (Gonzalez-Castro ) and in IVF media (Takatori ). Such combinations of compounds and their cumulative effects on oocyte quality are still poorly studied. Nevertheless, mixtures of endocrine disruptors, including BPA, have already been shown to have cumulative estrogenic effects on human endometrial cells (Aichinger ). Other mixtures of compounds even showed synergistic endocrine disruption effects in human adrenocortical cells (Ahmed ) or during embryo development in fish (Wu ). More studies are required to investigate the effects of mixtures of endocrine disruptors on oocyte quality. In this study, bisphenols were detected in all the consumables assessed. Indeed, the addition of bisphenols to plastic consumables renders them hard to break, resistant to heat and easy to sterilize. These advantages can explain their widespread use in polypropylene or polystyrene-based plastic consumables. Here, we reported no leaching of the 10 bisphenols assessed from plastic consumables under routine practice conditions. This result is in line with previous studies that focused on BPA (Mahalingaiah ; Gatimel ). These data are reassuring. Despite the presence of BPA, BPS and BPAF in the plastic consumables used in ART, no additional bisphenol, over and above that detected in ART media, is expected to leach from the consumables. Nevertheless, the present study did not analyze all possible plastic consumables and cannot rule out the possibility that leaching may be observed at higher temperatures than in our conditions. Furthermore, the study from Gatimel found BPA in the strippers used to remove the cumulus from the oocyte. It would be interesting to analyze these strippers for the 10 bisphenols measured in this study. The source of the bisphenols measured in culture media is still unknown. Indeed, we still do not know whether the presence of bisphenols came from leaching in the medium’s plastic bottle or from the media production process. Moreover, even media supplied in glass vials exhibited BPS, BPA and/or BPE levels. Our results did not demonstrate a leaching effect from the plastic bottle under routine practice conditions. It is nevertheless possible that leaching had already reached a plateau with the culture media originally present in the bottle and that the leaching experiment performed by replacing these media with water did not allow further leaching from the plastic. To answer this question, close collaboration with the companies producing ART medium would be required, so that media at different steps of the production process could be analyzed. Regulation for plastic intended to come into contact with food is constantly evolving and integrating new knowledge on the endocrine properties of bisphenols. In parallel, water regulations have been implemented, through the European Union Water framework Directive (BPA and BPS) and European Union Drinking water Directive (BPA). To the author’s knowledge, thus far no considerations are made for these compounds in the ART context. In this study, analytical methods for bisphenol measurement were developed with many endpoints for quality control, considering the ubiquity and risks of sample contamination. Despite these precautions, some contamination can occur. This is why we chose to focus only on samples exhibiting bisphenol levels higher than 15 times the LOQ. Owing to the limited set of available samples, there is a need to replicate assays on a higher number of samples (both in terms of references and batch numbers assessed) to be more representative and to investigate whether some ART media could be less potentially harmful in terms of bisphenol content.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we showed that the plastic consumables assessed in this paper and used in ART do not release bisphenols under routine conditions. Conversely, cell culture media, as well as media used in ART, exhibited BPS in 16 of the 18 types of media assessed, six of them containing BPS in the nanomolar concentration range. As BPS was already reported to impair oocyte quality, its presence in ART media could contribute to a decrease in the ART success rate. Further studies are required to investigate a greater number of ART media to identify the less deleterious ones, in terms of bisphenol abundance.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at Human Reproduction.

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.

Authors’ roles

A.T. and S.E. participated in the study design and the analyses and drafted the manuscript. A.D., O.T., C.B., C.V., V.M., F.G. and A.B. helped drafted the manuscript and participated in the critical discussion. S.B. participated in the execution of the experimental design, its analyses and the critical discussion.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the ‘Centre-Val de Loire’ Region (Bemol project, APR IR 2017), INRAE, BRGM, the French National Research Agency (project ANR-18-CE34-0011-01 MAMBO) and the BioMedicine Agency (Project 18AMP006 FertiPhenol).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the reported research. Click here for additional data file.
  50 in total

1.  Synergistic potential of fenvalerate and triadimefon on endocrine disruption and oxidative stress during rare minnow embryo development.

Authors:  Shenggan Wu; Gaojie Hu; Xueping Zhao; Qiang Wang; Jinhua Jiang
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.119

2.  Bisphenol A in culture media and plastic consumables used for ART.

Authors:  N Gatimel; M Z Lacroix; S Chanthavisouk; N Picard-Hagen; V Gayrard; J Parinaud; R D Léandri
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The effect of caffeine consumption on the success rate of pregnancy as well various performance parameters of in-vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Inaam El-Doush; Bellido Grisellhi; Serdar Coskun
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2010-12

4.  Combinatory estrogenic effects of bisphenol A in mixtures with alternariol and zearalenone in human endometrial cells.

Authors:  Georg Aichinger; Foteini Pantazi; Doris Marko
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Simultaneous effects of endocrine disruptor bisphenol A and flavonoid fisetin on progesterone production by granulosa cells.

Authors:  Alzbeta Bujnakova Mlynarcikova; Sona Scsukova
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.860

6.  Effect of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,-bis (4-chlorophenyl)-ethane (DDT) in follicular fluid on the results of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) programs.

Authors:  Simona Jirsová; Jaromír Masata; Libor Jech; Jana Zvárová
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Inhibitory effects of preimplantation exposure to bisphenol-A on blastocyst development and implantation.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Pan; Xuenan Wang; Yanmei Sun; Zhaohua Dou; Zhixin Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 8.  From BPA to its analogues: Is it a safe journey?

Authors:  Afia Usman; Masood Ahmad
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Does BPA alter steroid hormone synthesis in human granulosa cells in vitro?

Authors:  Abdallah Mansur; Michal Adir; Gil Yerushalmi; Ariel Hourvitz; Hila Gitman; Yuval Yung; Raoul Orvieto; Ronit Machtinger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-04-24       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004.

Authors:  Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Lee-Yang Wong; John A Reidy; Larry L Needham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Oxidative Stress and Assisted Reproduction: A Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiological Role and Strategies for Optimizing Embryo Culture Environment.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Israel Maldonado Rosas; Christina Anagnostopoulou; Rossella Cannarella; Florence Boitrelle; Lina Villar Munoz; Renata Finelli; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Ralf Henkel; Ramadan Saleh
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.