| Literature DB >> 33420629 |
Elliot Naidus1,2, Jerome Bouquet3, David Y Oh1,4, Timothy J Looney5, Hai Yang4, Lawrence Fong1,4, Nathan E Standifer6, Li Zhang7,8,9.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are designed to activate exhausted tumor-reactive T cells thereby leading to tumor regression. Durvalumab, an ICI that binds to the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) molecule, is approved as a consolidation therapy for treatment of patients with stage III, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunophenotypic analysis of circulating immune cells revealed increases in circulating proliferating CD4 + and CD8 + T cells earlier after durvalumab treatment. To examine durvalumab's mechanism of action and identify potential predictive biomarkers, we assessed the circulating T cells phenotypes and TCR genes of 71 NSCLC patients receiving durvalumab enrolled in a Phase I trial (NCT01693562, September 14, 2012). Next-generation sequencing of TCR repertoire was performed on these NSCLC patients' peripheral blood samples at baseline and day 15. Though patients' TCR repertoire diversity showed mixed responses to the treatment, patients exhibiting increased diversity on day 15 attained significantly longer overall survival (OS) (median OS was not reached vs 17.2 months for those with decreased diversity, p = 0.015). We applied network analysis to assess convergent T cell clonotypes indicative of an antigen-driven immune response. Patients with larger TCR clusters had improved OS (median OS was not reached vs 13.1 months for patients with smaller TCR clusters, p = 0.013). Early TCR repertoire diversification after durvalumab therapy for NSCLC may be predictive of increased survival and provides a mechanistic basis for durvalumab pharmacodynamic activity.Entities:
Keywords: Circulating T cells; Diversity; NSCLC; Network analysis; PD-L1; TCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33420629 PMCID: PMC8195930 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02833-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother ISSN: 0340-7004 Impact factor: 6.968
Baseline (prior to durvalumab therapy) clinical and demographic characteristics of the 71 patients who have high-quality TCR sequencing data in either time points
| Characteristic | Number of patients ( |
|---|---|
| Male sex—no. (%) | 39 (54.9) |
| Age ≥ 65 years—no. (%) | 36 (50.7) |
| Squamous histology—no. (%) | 37 (52.1) |
| Caucasian race—no. (%) | 71 (100) |
| PD-L1 low/negative—no. (%) | 20 (29.0) |
| ECOG score of 1 at baseline—no. (%) | 45 (63.4) |
| Smoking history—no. (%) | |
| Current | 13 (18.3) |
| Former | 53 (74.6) |
| Never | 5 (7.0) |
| Prior line of therapy—no. (%) | 21 (29.6) |
| Liver metastases at baseline—no. (%) | 19 (27.5) |
| Response | |
| Progressive disease | 21 (29.6) |
| Stable disease | 34 (47.9) |
| Response | 16 (22.5) |
Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling of clinical variables and relative clonality change from baseline to post-treatment with overall survival
| Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRa | 95% CIb | HRa | 95% CIb | |||
| Male sex | 1.56 | (0.79, 3.08) | 0.197 | 2.14 | (0.79,5.75) | 0.134 |
| Age ≥ 65 years | 1.71 | (0.87, 3.34) | 0.119 | 2.06 | (0.76,5.55) | 0.154 |
| Squamous histology | 1.68 | (0.83, 3.39) | 0.147 | |||
| PD-L1 low/negative | 2.01 | (0.99, 4.10) | 0.054 | 1.94 | (0.74,5.11) | 0.178 |
| ECOG score of 1 at baseline | 2.34 | (1.09, 4.99) | 0.028 | |||
| Ever-smoker | 0.44 | (0.17, 1.15) | 0.093 | 2.65 | (0.66,10.63) | 0.169 |
| Prior line of therapy | 2.09 | (0.91,4.80) | 0.081 | 0.45 | (0.16,1.25) | 0.124 |
| Liver metastases at baseline | 1.94 | (0.95, 3.99) | 0.070 | |||
| Baseline clonality | 6.21 | (0.25,156.03) | 0.267 | |||
| Increased clonalityc | 3.32 | (1.20, 9.20) | 0.021 | 2.79 | (0.90,8.66) | 0.075 |
aHR: hazard ratio
b95% CI: 95% confidence interval
cIncreased clonality: defined based on clonality at day 15 is greater than baseline clonality
Fig. 1The relationship of TCR repertoire changes with overall survival (OS). a Kaplan–Meier curves of OS for the patients with increased (solid line) vs decreased (dashed line) TCR repertoire clonality from baseline to post-treatment. b Kaplan–Meier curves of OS for the patients with increased (solid line) vs decreased (dash line) TCR convergence frequency (TCF) from baseline to post-treatment. c Kaplan–Meier curves of OS for patients with increased clonality (CL) and increased TCF (solid line) from baseline to post-treatment vs rest of the patients (dashed line)
Fig. 2The relationship of TCR network properties with overall survival (OS). a Kaplan–Meier curves of OS for the patients with larger diameters (dashed line) vs shorter diameters (solid line). b Network figures for the two representative patients. Patient A with OS of 2.7 months, while Patient B with OS of 31.3 months. Each node represents a single amino acid sequence colored by the time points. The nodes connected by lines were within the same convergent group