Literature DB >> 33420254

Exploring gene knockout strategies to identify potential drug targets using genome-scale metabolic models.

Abhijit Paul1, Rajat Anand1, Sonali Porey Karmakar1, Surender Rawat1, Nandadulal Bairagi2, Samrat Chatterjee3.   

Abstract

Research on new cancer drugs is performed either through gene knockout studies or phenotypic screening of drugs in cancer cell-lines. Both of these approaches are costly and time-consuming. Computational framework, e.g., genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs), could be a good alternative to find potential drug targets. The present study aims to investigate the applicability of gene knockout strategies to be used as the finding of drug targets using GSMMs. We performed single-gene knockout studies on existing GSMMs of the NCI-60 cell-lines obtained from 9 tissue types. The metabolic genes responsible for the growth of cancerous cells were identified and then ranked based on their cellular growth reduction. The possible growth reduction mechanisms, which matches with the gene knockout results, were described. Gene ranking was used to identify potential drug targets, which reduce the growth rate of cancer cells but not of the normal cells. The gene ranking results were also compared with existing shRNA screening data. The rank-correlation results for most of the cell-lines were not satisfactory for a single-gene knockout, but it played a significant role in deciding the activity of drug against cell proliferation, whereas multiple gene knockout analysis gave better correlation results. We validated our theoretical results experimentally and showed that the drugs mitotane and myxothiazol can inhibit the growth of at least four cell-lines of NCI-60 database.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420254      PMCID: PMC7794450          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80561-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  86 in total

1.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0.

Authors:  Jan Schellenberger; Richard Que; Ronan M T Fleming; Ines Thiele; Jeffrey D Orth; Adam M Feist; Daniel C Zielinski; Aarash Bordbar; Nathan E Lewis; Sorena Rahmanian; Joseph Kang; Daniel R Hyduke; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Overexpression of UQCRC2 is correlated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Shang; Fang Zhang; Dehui Li; Chang Li; Hongbo Li; Yingjian Jiang; Dianliang Zhang
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Downregulation of mitochondrial UQCRB inhibits cancer stem cell-like properties in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Narae Jung; Ho Jeong Kwon; Hye Jin Jung
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.650

4.  Data mining the NCI60 to predict generalized cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Adam C Lee; Kerby Shedden; Gustavo R Rosania; Gordon M Crippen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Inhibition of SOAT1 Suppresses Glioblastoma Growth via Blocking SREBP-1-Mediated Lipogenesis.

Authors:  Feng Geng; Xiang Cheng; Xiaoning Wu; Ji Young Yoo; Chunming Cheng; Jeffrey Yunhua Guo; Xiaokui Mo; Peng Ru; Brian Hurwitz; Sung-Hak Kim; Jose Otero; Vinay Puduvalli; Etienne Lefai; Jianjie Ma; Ichiro Nakano; Craig Horbinski; Balveen Kaur; Arnab Chakravarti; Deliang Guo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Ubiquinol cytochrome c reductase (UQCRFS1) gene amplification in primary breast cancer core biopsy samples.

Authors:  Yoko Ohashi; Saori J Kaneko; Tommy E Cupples; S Robert Young
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0.

Authors:  Laurent Heirendt; Sylvain Arreckx; Thomas Pfau; Sebastián N Mendoza; Anne Richelle; Almut Heinken; Hulda S Haraldsdóttir; Jacek Wachowiak; Sarah M Keating; Vanja Vlasov; Stefania Magnusdóttir; Chiam Yu Ng; German Preciat; Alise Žagare; Siu H J Chan; Maike K Aurich; Catherine M Clancy; Jennifer Modamio; John T Sauls; Alberto Noronha; Aarash Bordbar; Benjamin Cousins; Diana C El Assal; Luis V Valcarcel; Iñigo Apaolaza; Susan Ghaderi; Masoud Ahookhosh; Marouen Ben Guebila; Andrejs Kostromins; Nicolas Sompairac; Hoai M Le; Ding Ma; Yuekai Sun; Lin Wang; James T Yurkovich; Miguel A P Oliveira; Phan T Vuong; Lemmer P El Assal; Inna Kuperstein; Andrei Zinovyev; H Scott Hinton; William A Bryant; Francisco J Aragón Artacho; Francisco J Planes; Egils Stalidzans; Alejandro Maass; Santosh Vempala; Michael Hucka; Michael A Saunders; Costas D Maranas; Nathan E Lewis; Thomas Sauter; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Ines Thiele; Ronan M T Fleming
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  Cancer: a Systems Biology disease.

Authors:  Jorrit J Hornberg; Frank J Bruggeman; Hans V Westerhoff; Jan Lankelma
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Investments in cancer research awarded to UK institutions and the global burden of cancer 2000-2013: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Mahiben Maruthappu; Michael G Head; Charlie D Zhou; Barnabas J Gilbert; Majd A El-Harasis; Rosalind Raine; Joseph R Fitchett; Rifat Atun
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A computational study of the Warburg effect identifies metabolic targets inhibiting cancer migration.

Authors:  Keren Yizhak; Sylvia E Le Dévédec; Vasiliki Maria Rogkoti; Franziska Baenke; Vincent C de Boer; Christian Frezza; Almut Schulze; Bob van de Water; Eytan Ruppin
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  1 in total

1.  Recombinant COL6 α2 as a Self-Organization Factor That Triggers Orderly Nerve Regeneration Without Guidance Cues.

Authors:  Zhou Fang; Jian-Long Zou
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.505

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.