Literature DB >> 33419904

The PROMISES study: a mixed methods approach to explore the acceptability of salivary progesterone testing for preterm birth risk among pregnant women and trained frontline healthcare workers in rural India.

Danielle Ashworth1, Pankhuri Sharma2, Sergio A Silverio1, Simi Khan2, Nishtha Kathuria2, Priyanka Garg2, Mohan Ghule2, V B Shivkumar3, Atul Tayade4, Sunil Mehra5, Poonam V Shivkumar6, Rachel M Tribe7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: India has an overall neonatal mortality rate of 28/1000 live births, with higher rates in rural India. Approximately 3.5 million pregnancies in India are affected by preterm birth (PTB) annually and contribute to approximately a quarter of PTBs globally. Embedded within the PROMISES study (which aims to validate a low-cost salivary progesterone test for early detection of PTB risk), we present a mixed methods explanatory sequential feasibility substudy of the salivary progesterone test.
METHODS: A pretraining and post-training questionnaire to assess Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) (n=201) knowledge and experience of PTB and salivary progesterone sampling was analysed using the McNemar test. Descriptive statistics for a cross-sectional survey of pregnant women (n=400) are presented in which the acceptability of this test for pregnant women is assessed. Structured interviews were undertaken with ASHAs (n=10) and pregnant women (n=9), and were analysed using thematic framework analysis to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing the use of this test in rural India.
RESULTS: Before training, ASHAs' knowledge of PTB (including risk factors, causes, postnatal support and testing) was very limited. After the training programme, there was a significant improvement in the ASHAs' knowledge of PTB. All 400 women reported the salivary test was acceptable with the majority finding it easy but not quick or better than drawing blood. For the qualitative aspects of the study, analysis of interview data with ASHAs and women, our thematic framework comprised of three main areas: implementation of intervention; networks of influence and access to healthcare. Qualitative data were stratified and presented as barriers and facilitators.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests support for ongoing investigations validating PTB testing using salivary progesterone in rural settings. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maternal medicine; prenatal diagnosis; public health

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419904      PMCID: PMC7798670          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  28 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Using mixed methods to identify and answer clinically relevant research questions.

Authors:  Catherine L Shneerson; Nicola K Gale
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-04-08

3.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies.

Authors:  Jill J Francis; Marie Johnston; Clare Robertson; Liz Glidewell; Vikki Entwistle; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-12

4.  National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications.

Authors:  Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Doris Chou; Ann-Beth Moller; Rajesh Narwal; Alma Adler; Claudia Vera Garcia; Sarah Rohde; Lale Say; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Effect of participatory women's groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists on birth outcomes in rural eastern India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Prasanta Tripathy; Nirmala Nair; Rajesh Sinha; Shibanand Rath; Raj Kumar Gope; Suchitra Rath; Swati Sarbani Roy; Aparna Bajpai; Vijay Singh; Vikash Nath; Sarfraz Ali; Alok Kumar Kundu; Dibakar Choudhury; Sanjib Kumar Ghosh; Sanjay Kumar; Rajendra Mahapatra; Anthony Costello; Edward Fottrell; Tanja A J Houweling; Audrey Prost
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 26.763

6.  Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000.

Authors:  Li Liu; Hope L Johnson; Simon Cousens; Jamie Perin; Susana Scott; Joy E Lawn; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Richard Cibulskis; Mengying Li; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Assessment of 'accredited social health activists'-a national community health volunteer scheme in Karnataka State, India.

Authors:  Farah N Fathima; Mohan Raju; Kiruba S Varadharajan; Aditi Krishnamurthy; S R Ananthkumar; Prem K Mony
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Home-based records for poor mothers and children in Afghanistan, a cross sectional population based study.

Authors:  Sayed Ataullah Saeedzai; Iftekhar Sadaat; Zelaikha Anwari; Shafiqullah Hemat; Shakir Hadad; Keiko Osaki; Megumi Asaba; Yohei Ishiguro; Rasuli Mudassir; Jane Machlin Burke; Ariel Higgins-Steele; Khaksar Yousufi; Karen Margaret Edmond
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: a research review.

Authors:  Allison Squires
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 6.612

10.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.