C M Collopy1, S M Cosh2, P J Tully3. 1. School of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia. 2. School of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia. scosh@une.edu.au. 3. Freemasons Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are commonly comorbid with mental health disorders, portending poorer cardiac prognosis. Despite the high prevalence of depression and anxiety, and guidelines recommending routine depression screening and referral, uptake of mental healthcare in CVD populations remains low. Reasons for the underutilisation of mental health and psychological services for this population remain largely unknown. METHODS: Thirteen CVD patients with clinically significant psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety and/or stress) participated in one-on-one in-depth semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Barriers to uptake included the timing of referral and screening, with patients reporting a need for longer term follow-up. A lack of information provision and understanding around mental health and services, especially following cardiac-events were further barriers. A reluctance to report mental health or engage in services was also identified, with patients indicating a preference for informal peer support networks. A range of practical barriers such as mobility, transport and cost were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: Longer term follow-up and routine mental health assessment may be beneficial to facilitate use of mental health services. Upskilling of practitioners around mental health may be a further avenue to promote information provision and enhance service use. Further focus on enhancing informal peer support may be a valuable initial approach for the CVD population. The implications for improving services and enhancing service use are discussed.
BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are commonly comorbid with mental health disorders, portending poorer cardiac prognosis. Despite the high prevalence of depression and anxiety, and guidelines recommending routine depression screening and referral, uptake of mental healthcare in CVD populations remains low. Reasons for the underutilisation of mental health and psychological services for this population remain largely unknown. METHODS: Thirteen CVDpatients with clinically significant psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety and/or stress) participated in one-on-one in-depth semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Barriers to uptake included the timing of referral and screening, with patients reporting a need for longer term follow-up. A lack of information provision and understanding around mental health and services, especially following cardiac-events were further barriers. A reluctance to report mental health or engage in services was also identified, with patients indicating a preference for informal peer support networks. A range of practical barriers such as mobility, transport and cost were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: Longer term follow-up and routine mental health assessment may be beneficial to facilitate use of mental health services. Upskilling of practitioners around mental health may be a further avenue to promote information provision and enhance service use. Further focus on enhancing informal peer support may be a valuable initial approach for the CVD population. The implications for improving services and enhancing service use are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anxiety; Coronary heart disease (CHD); Depression; Depression screening; Help seeking; Mental health services; Mental health treatment; Mental wellbeing; Service use; Thematic analysis
Authors: David L Hare; Andrew G O Stewart; Andrea Driscoll; Stephanie Mathews; Samia R Toukhsati Journal: Heart Lung Circ Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 2.975
Authors: Judith H Lichtman; J Thomas Bigger; James A Blumenthal; Nancy Frasure-Smith; Peter G Kaufmann; François Lespérance; Daniel B Mark; David S Sheps; C Barr Taylor; Erika Sivarajan Froelicher Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-09-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Albert L Siu; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Linda Ciofu Baumann; Karina W Davidson; Mark Ebell; Francisco A R García; Matthew Gillman; Jessica Herzstein; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marijn A Prins; Peter F M Verhaak; Klaas van der Meer; Brenda W J H Penninx; Jozien M Bensing Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 4.839