Literature DB >> 34910821

Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with coronary artery disease.

Phillip J Tully1, Ser Yee Ang1, Emily Jl Lee1, Eileen Bendig2, Natalie Bauereiß2, Jürgen Bengel3, Harald Baumeister2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression occurs frequently in individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with a poor prognosis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in CAD patients with comorbid depression. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases up to August 2020. We also searched three clinical trials registers in September 2021. We examined reference lists of included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and contacted primary authors. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs investigating psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in adults with CAD and comorbid depression. Our primary outcomes included depression, mortality, and cardiac events. Secondary outcomes were healthcare costs and utilisation, health-related quality of life, cardiovascular vital signs, biomarkers of platelet activation, electrocardiogram wave parameters, non-cardiac adverse events, and pharmacological side effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently examined the identified papers for inclusion and extracted data from the included studies. We performed random-effects model meta-analyses to compute overall estimates of treatment outcomes. MAIN
RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Psychological interventions may result in a reduction in end-of-treatment depression symptoms compared to controls (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.92 to -0.19, I2 = 88%; low certainty evidence; 10 trials; n = 1226). No effect was evident on medium-term depression symptoms one to six months after the end of treatment (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.01, I2 = 69%; 7 trials; n = 2654). The evidence for long-term depression symptoms and depression response was sparse for this comparison. There is low certainty evidence that psychological interventions may result in little to no difference in end-of-treatment depression remission (odds ratio (OR) 2.02, 95% CI 0.78 to 5.19, I2 = 87%; low certainty evidence; 3 trials; n = 862). Based on one to two trials per outcome, no beneficial effects on mortality and cardiac events of psychological interventions versus control were consistently found. The evidence was very uncertain for end-of-treatment effects on all-cause mortality, and data were not reported for end-of-treatment cardiovascular mortality and occurrence of myocardial infarction for this comparison. In the trials examining a head-to-head comparison of varying psychological interventions or clinical management, the evidence regarding the effect on end-of-treatment depression symptoms is very uncertain for: cognitive behavioural therapy compared to supportive stress management; behaviour therapy compared to person-centred therapy; cognitive behavioural therapy and well-being therapy compared to clinical management. There is low certainty evidence from one trial that cognitive behavioural therapy may result in little to no difference in end-of-treatment depression remission compared to supportive stress management (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 4.50; low certainty evidence; n = 83). Based on one to two trials per outcome, no beneficial effects on depression remission, depression response, mortality rates, and cardiac events were consistently found in head-to-head comparisons between psychological interventions or clinical management. The review suggests that pharmacological intervention may have a large effect on end-of-treatment depression symptoms (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.33 to -0.32, I2 = 90%; low certainty evidence; 8 trials; n = 750). Pharmacological interventions probably result in a moderate to large increase in depression remission (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.89, I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence; 4 trials; n = 646). We found an effect favouring pharmacological intervention versus placebo on depression response at the end of treatment, though strength of evidence was not rated (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.54, I2 = 62%; 5 trials; n = 891). Based on one to four trials per outcome, no beneficial effects regarding mortality and cardiac events were consistently found for pharmacological versus placebo trials, and the evidence was very uncertain for end-of-treatment effects on all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. In the trials examining a head-to-head comparison of varying pharmacological agents, the evidence was very uncertain for end-of-treatment effects on depression symptoms. The evidence regarding the effects of different pharmacological agents on depression symptoms at end of treatment is very uncertain for: simvastatin versus atorvastatin; paroxetine versus fluoxetine; and escitalopram versus Bu Xin Qi. No trials were eligible for the comparison of a psychological intervention with a pharmacological intervention. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with CAD and depression, there is low certainty evidence that psychological intervention may result in a reduction in depression symptoms at the end of treatment. There was also low certainty evidence that pharmacological interventions may result in a large reduction of depression symptoms at the end of treatment. Moderate certainty evidence suggests that pharmacological intervention probably results in a moderate to large increase in depression remission at the end of treatment. Evidence on maintenance effects and the durability of these short-term findings is still missing. The evidence for our primary and secondary outcomes, apart from depression symptoms at end of treatment, is still sparse due to the low number of trials per outcome and the heterogeneity of examined populations and interventions. As psychological and pharmacological interventions can seemingly have a large to only a small or no effect on depression, there is a need for research focusing on extracting those approaches able to substantially improve depression in individuals with CAD and depression.
Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34910821      PMCID: PMC8673695          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008012.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  242 in total

Review 1.  Omega-3 fatty acids for depression in adults.

Authors:  Katherine M Appleton; Hannah M Sallis; Rachel Perry; Andrew R Ness; Rachel Churchill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 2.  The effects of mirtazapine on central noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission.

Authors:  T de Boer
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.659

3.  Randomized controlled trial of a well-being intervention in cardiac patients.

Authors:  Gholam Reza Nikrahan; Leila Eshaghi; Christina N Massey; Aazam Hemmat; Hermioni L Amonoo; Brian Healy; Jeff C Huffman
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 4.  Psychiatric and somatic comorbidities are negatively associated with quality of life in physically ill patients.

Authors:  Harald Baumeister; Katrin Balke; Martin Härter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Alprazolam treatment of postcoronary bypass anxiety and depression.

Authors:  A M Freeman; L Fleece; D G Folks; R S Sokol; K R Hall; A D Pacifico; D C McGiffin; J K Kirklin; G L Zorn; R B Karp
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 6.  Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Robert J DeRubeis; Steven D Hollon; Sona Dimidjian; Jay D Amsterdam; Richard C Shelton; Jan Fawcett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The impact of cognitive behavioral group training on event-free survival in patients with myocardial infarction: the ENRICHD experience.

Authors:  Patrice G Saab; Heejung Bang; Redford B Williams; Lynda H Powell; Neil Schneiderman; Carl Thoresen; Matthew Burg; Francis Keefe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Metacognitive therapy home-based self-help for cardiac rehabilitation patients experiencing anxiety and depressive symptoms: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (PATHWAY Home-MCT).

Authors:  Adrian Wells; Kirsten McNicol; David Reeves; Peter Salmon; Linda Davies; Anthony Heagerty; Patrick Doherty; Rebecca McPhillips; Rebecca Anderson; Cintia Faija; Lora Capobianco; Helen Morley; Hannah Gaffney; Calvin Heal; Gemma Shields; Peter Fisher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment for cardiac patients with depression in Germany - short term results.

Authors:  Jürgen Barth; Juliane Paul; Martin Härter; Jürgen Bengel
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2005-03-23

10.  Development and refinement of a complex intervention within cardiac rehabilitation services: experiences from the CADENCE feasibility study.

Authors:  Rachel Winder; Suzanne H Richards; John L Campbell; David A Richards; Chris Dickens; Manish Gandhi; Christine Wright; Katrina Turner
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2017-02-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Prognostic Value of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Depression.

Authors:  Weiya Li; Di Qiu; Han Yin; Yu Wang; Yilin Chen; Quanjun Liu; Huan Ma; Qingshan Geng
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Cardiovascular Disease Patients: Results From the CHAMPS Pilot-Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Phillip J Tully; Deborah A Turnbull; John D Horowitz; John F Beltrame; Bernhard T Baune; Shannon Sauer-Zavala; Harald Baumeister; Christopher G Bean; Ronette B Pinto; Suzie Cosh; Gary A Wittert
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.435

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.